Active Users:845 Time:22/01/2026 09:19:02 PM
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. lord-of-shadow Send a noteboard - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM
Speaking as someone who has been reading the books for years, Graendal never even crossed my mind as a possibility except when people at Wotmania suggested it.

It just doesn't make much sense to me. Sure, she had the means, and there aren't any facts contradicting it. But that would be such a low-impact revelation, especially when there are choices like Slayer, Lanfear, Moridin, Demandred, Padan Fain, and Shaidar Haran. Every single one of which has more opportunity for dramatic impact. Graendal seems like a boring, easy way out to me, and I can't think of a situation where revealing that it was her is in any way important.

I think the idea that Graendal is an obvious choice only works if you're coming from the point of view of a really big, analytic fan that actually spends hours and hours theorizing outside of the books. I've never gotten the impression that Sanderson fit that description.
This message last edited by lord-of-shadow on 14/11/2009 at 07:39:46 PM
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1411 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 839 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 963 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 943 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 787 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 741 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 774 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 657 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 637 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 677 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 802 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 812 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 656 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 734 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 843 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 795 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 718 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 304 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 301 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 791 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 941 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 283 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 293 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 642 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 738 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 285 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 747 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 801 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 801 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 670 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 818 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 726 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 689 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 765 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 672 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 620 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 912 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 312 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 291 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 663 Views

Reply to Message