You said above that Graendal will be in the next book, because the timeline issue allows it and you indicated that she might have a PoV then. If you just meant the word "Graendal" will be in the next book, what you wrote doesn't make any sense, but is just plain silly.
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory
14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM
- 1320 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that.
14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM
- 762 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books...
14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM
- 888 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal
14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM
- 873 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV
14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM
- 718 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes.
14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM
- 680 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV
14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM
- 691 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny.
20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM
- 610 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it
20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM
- 567 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either.
20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM
- 594 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo...
20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM
- 741 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much.
14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM
- 664 Views
That's wrong
14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM
- 779 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong.
15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM
- 747 Views
right here
15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM
- 657 Views
If Graendal's name is mentioned, then "Graendal" is in the book. *NM*
15/11/2009 12:13:57 PM
- 297 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM*
15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM
- 281 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM*
15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM
- 265 Views
15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM
- 726 Views

BS never would have figured it out himself that Graendal did it? *NM*
14/11/2009 05:20:19 PM
- 286 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that.
19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM
- 868 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws...
14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM
- 669 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson.
14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM
- 737 Views
No. Try again.
14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM
- 736 Views
Ok, I will stay alert for further blows to Graendaldunnit, if this didn't already convince you!
*NM*
15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM
- 263 Views

Actually this is more against the Slayer theory
15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM
- 662 Views
Nonsense...
15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM
- 626 Views
Your tenacity is impressive.
15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM
- 685 Views

Absolut statements in such discussions...
15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM
- 614 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions...
15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM
- 556 Views