Active Users:506 Time:15/12/2025 12:47:06 AM
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory Sidious Send a noteboard - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM

A: "Brandon had been a fan for a long time before he got to find out who killed Asmodean. He said that he had heard arguments for every possible suspect, including the really crazy ones like Tam. So when he found out the real answer, he wasn’t shocked. His reaction was more 'Oh, those guys were right'. He said that the clues are there, but he never would have figured it out himself."

That's pretty much Graendal if you ask me. Most readers will be shocked to find out its Slayer. It's as likely as finding out Moiraine did it.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1384 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 821 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 939 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 920 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 760 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 725 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 754 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 642 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 615 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 656 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 783 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 793 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 630 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 718 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 823 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 773 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 699 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 296 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 292 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 773 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 914 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 274 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 287 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 623 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 717 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 280 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 725 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 779 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 772 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 651 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 797 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 709 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 664 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 740 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 648 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 602 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 891 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 303 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 282 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 644 Views

Reply to Message