Active Users:1556 Time:17/12/2025 03:58:34 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
They are politicians at heart... everynametaken Send a noteboard - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM
I'm half way through tGS and something popped into my mind.....what is the point of the Aes Sedai? Are they comic relief? Are they just filler?

So, yes and yes. :D

Have the Aes Sedai contributed anything major to the storyline? Have they discovered any knowledge about the Last Battle to help Rand? Have they helped with any of the conflicts among nations/factions to help bring order to Randland prior to the Last Battle? Have they even captured or killed a Forsaken? They just keep fighting among themselves.....what's the point!

They've screwed a lot of obvious stuff up.
Why would they ever choose past history as an example of what might happen now?
Nope, they've just exacerbated problems in other nations.
Neg-a-tivo on the actually capturing a bad guy/girl (well I guess Nynaeve capturing Moghedien is technically a win, but she wasn't Aes Sedai at the time was she? But, eventually they lost the two they had!
Partisanship is a nasty thing. :P

Thoughts?

See! Perfect politicians! :D


Hmm, my repely had nm for some reason.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
This message last edited by everynametaken on 17/11/2009 at 06:59:49 AM
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... trzaska2000 - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1412 Views
They are politicians at heart... everynametaken - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 992 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* fionwe1987 - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 486 Views
Cadsuane hasn't done anything and Moiraine.....you mean that person from 7 books ago? trzaska2000 - 17/11/2009 05:51:16 AM 760 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* ajfurst - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 359 Views
What use have the Andorans been then? As a nation, not individuals. *NM* fionwe1987 - 17/11/2009 06:53:35 AM 389 Views
Not much - of all plots in WOT I wish Daughter Heir had meant Heir, not Daughter of the Heir *NM* ajfurst - 18/11/2009 08:54:18 AM 366 Views
She is the Heir, not the daughter of the heir! *NM* fionwe1987 - 18/11/2009 05:24:24 PM 374 Views
As we found out, in painfully slow manner, she was neither! *NM* BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 01:31:02 PM 358 Views
Short answer: nope. Marshall - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 937 Views
Good answer.....so why are so many stories devoted to those that are only indirectly..... trzaska2000 - 17/11/2009 05:54:10 AM 733 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 759 Views
rather.. urizen - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 869 Views
I think those critiques are overblown and not based on a fair analaysis of WoT History RugbyPlayingAshaman - 18/11/2009 03:15:12 PM 840 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. Onarishma - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 788 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. urizen - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 768 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine Onarishma - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 711 Views
But then.. urizen - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 806 Views
Kind of Sort of fairfax - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 752 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... Onarishma - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 707 Views
AS exist for you to question the purpose of all self-serving organizations making grand claims redhand - 17/11/2009 09:31:24 AM 2147 Views
Re: AS exist for you to question the purpose of all self-serving organizations making grand claims Watcher - 17/11/2009 12:44:35 PM 1509 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... LewsTherin10 - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 782 Views
Always help or contribute.....never do or lead..... trzaska2000 - 17/11/2009 04:23:04 PM 709 Views
if that internal silliness is not resolved the power of a united front will remain compromised. *NM* Onarishma - 17/11/2009 11:11:54 PM 408 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 691 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... LewsTherin10 - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 946 Views
You're asking the wrong question HyogaRott - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 757 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group NaClH2O - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 734 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* trzaska2000 - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 431 Views
Scored using your words NaClH2O - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 857 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... trzaska2000 - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 708 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* Marshall - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 345 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* fionwe1987 - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 469 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... trzaska2000 - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 750 Views
They reduced her in power. TheCrownless - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 662 Views
Perhaps 1/32th of a point.....she's still almost as powerful as any other woman..... trzaska2000 - 19/11/2009 01:00:26 AM 742 Views
So? fionwe1987 - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 688 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 632 Views
Have you read the books? NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 682 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... trzaska2000 - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 680 Views
So? fionwe1987 - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 742 Views
Oh dear! NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 644 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... trzaska2000 - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 610 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 813 Views
This is silly guttering flame - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 656 Views
There is no misrepresentation NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 675 Views
The point I made is guttering flame - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 660 Views
Are we speaking english? NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 869 Views
Not really BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 737 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 789 Views
OK NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 730 Views
No idea BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 700 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 836 Views
Well what do you think of BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 933 Views
And another point NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 627 Views
For the sake of argument, though BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 698 Views
OK fair enough NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 682 Views
rAndy aL - 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 799 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? trzaska2000 - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 650 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* fionwe1987 - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 322 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... trzaska2000 - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 670 Views
Yeah right... fionwe1987 - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 631 Views
Yes, seriously rAndy aL - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 728 Views
It's kind of amusing to see the prima donas bow and scrape before each other while the world ends. BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 01:37:42 PM 675 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes