Active Users:603 Time:02/02/2026 04:03:14 AM
Short answer: nope. Marshall Send a noteboard - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM
Our story happens to take place in a time where the White Tower and the rest of the world is rent with chaos, deception, and the general unraveling of the Pattern. While it's true, the Aes Sedai appear to be nothing but petty squabblers who poke their noses everywhere seemingly for their own personal gain, the combined history told by every character seems to indicate that, for most of the time since the Breaking at least, the Aes Sedai served were more or less a neutral society of channelers that kept, for the most part, power-hungry tyrants in check and attempted to keep chaos from sowing. Of course, that's not always the case, but if something crazy happened--i.e. a false dragon starting wars--the Aes Sedai were there to help. The fact that they had no intention of conquering territory lent a bit to their credence, I believe, and they do have a general principal: Aes Sedai means "servants of all" and, while they still aid any who ask, their aid comes at a price. Their manipulations exist everywhere, on every scale, so I'm inclined to think that the Aes Sedai have been both a blessing and a curse to Randland. There have certainly been instances where the Aes Sedai have helped, and instances where everyone would be better off without them.
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1430 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 1009 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 494 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 366 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 956 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 777 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 884 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 805 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 788 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 734 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 817 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 769 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 719 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 806 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 711 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 963 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 769 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 756 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 438 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 870 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 731 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 352 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 476 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 767 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 678 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 701 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 648 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 697 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 692 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 763 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 656 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 626 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 826 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 685 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 689 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 676 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 885 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 748 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 811 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 744 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 718 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 849 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 951 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 643 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 714 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 698 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 814 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 666 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 329 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 688 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 649 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 743 Views

Reply to Message