Active Users:681 Time:03/08/2026 08:55:23 AM
Re: AS exist for you to question the purpose of all self-serving organizations making grand claims Watcher Send a noteboard - 17/11/2009 12:44:35 PM
The main reason that so many different groups were shown in the series is that RJ was trying to make his world look realistic. If everyone was selfless and noble and willing to sacrafice for the greater good how interesting a book would that be. Hell the series would probably have ended by Book 2 as the combined nations armies and the Seanchan advance guard marched on the blight.

No group except possibly the Shadow are 100% either good or bad. Rand has made mistakes. The Aiel are kick ass warriors but do they ever hold a grudge against the people of Cairhien, most of whome were not consulted by their king before he cut down the tree and quite a few were not even alive at the time.

The Tairain High Lords are arrogant tyrants but their land is orderly if oppressed. Andor is showed mostly in a good light but they are willing to destroy an entire generation to attack a borderland army that has been keeping the world safe for years from the Shadowspawn just because they did not ask for permission to go south. The list could go on.

The Aes Sedai are high handed, think they are the most important group in the world, plot and scheme but consider this. They have stopped wars in the world, they have kept alive knowledge of the Shadow. One of them saved the world by finding the dragon reborn before the shadow. They are a centre of learning and while their methods can leave a lot to be desired the average Aes Sedai's heart is in the right place.
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1513 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 1089 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 535 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 411 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 1065 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 861 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 987 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 897 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 878 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 837 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 912 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 871 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 813 Views
AS exist for you to question the purpose of all self-serving organizations making grand claims - 17/11/2009 09:31:24 AM 2274 Views
Re: AS exist for you to question the purpose of all self-serving organizations making grand claims - 17/11/2009 12:44:35 PM 1607 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 900 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 806 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 1052 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 857 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 851 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 478 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 961 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 840 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 393 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 517 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 865 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 779 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 785 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 761 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 798 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 784 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 864 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 757 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 724 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 921 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 800 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 765 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 755 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 1005 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 851 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 887 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 835 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 811 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 930 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 1030 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 732 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 804 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 795 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 909 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 767 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 377 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 795 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 748 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 827 Views

Reply to Message