Active Users:2464 Time:28/06/2026 03:14:48 AM
Hmm... Sidious Send a noteboard - 19/11/2009 04:47:12 PM

I disagree. I think Sanderson has given us important new info that throws the female strength list into turmoil.

Here's why I say so:

1. It is a fallacy that RJ said Nynaeve was as strong as the average female Forsaken. That was our INTERPRETATION. But if I recall correctly, what RJ actually said, was that Nynaeve was as strong as MOST of the female Forsaken.

After Sanderson's quote, I take that to mean that MOST of the female Forsaken are not stronger than Nynaeve.


That was because RJ said that quote when FoH was out, making Nynaeve at least equal or as strong as Moghedien, Semirhage and Mesaana - and weaker than Graendal and Lanfear. Cyndane was not around. That still holds with what RJ said. If Cyndane is really that weak then Lanfear was enormously powerful compared to Graendal, and I find that very unlikely. On the other hand, it fits in with Semirhage's statement that Lanfear be given to her.

The Cyndane quote is an interesting one, and it would be great if Sanderson could clarify the situation for us. But the fact remains that he has not refuted the fact that she is significantly weakened, nor has he refuted the fact that she is below Nynaeve in strength.

In fact, his initial reaction to KCF's question was that only exceptional women are above Nynaeve, and when KCF referred to Cyndane, he was very dismissive of her strength.


To be honest, his next answer scares me. The fact that he argued with Maria over her strength which is clearly on a strength list is horrendous. He initially said that Cyndane was very very weak... who knows if he was confused with Cyndane and Cetalia or Cabriana. Then he said she was weakened, then he said her strength is what we expect it to be.

I agree that the so called definitive strength list hinges around Cyndane's placement, and until Sanderson clarifies the confusion he caused, that placement is now in doubt.


If Cyndane is weaker than Nynaeve it not only throws the female Forsaken into turmoil but the males too and it makes Lanfear so strong it's scary.

Still, we now know Mesaana overrated herself, and we know there are only 6 women above Nynaeve.


Well Mesaana didn't overrate herself actually. She said she matched Semirhage well in most areas and had strength where Semirhage had weaknesses. I still think this is true - Mesaana might be good at the weather for instance - we know that Semirhage is not.

Lanfear, Alivia and Sharina are definitely there. Talaan and Semirhage MIGHT be there. We're not sure of Someryn and we're not sure of Cyndane and Graendal.


Lanfear, Alivia and Sharina for certain. I think there's almost a 100% chance that Cyndane and Graendal are there too because many quotes in the series support this. Someryn is conjecture, but she is probably Forsaken strength.

It is also conceivable that Cyndane is now equal to Nynaeve, making Graendal weaker than Nynaeve.


I don't believe that someone of Nynaeve's strength could fight Alivia with a strong angreal, no matter what her knowledge.

With the new info Sanderson so graciously provided, I'm expecting further clarity in the near future.


I just want him to look at the list before he answers.

Now we just need to get people to ask him. I see that this topic is now being discussed on Theoryland, Dragonmount, 13th depository and even on ASOIAF boards.

Surely the level of interest will result in more people asking him these kinds of questions.


We should move on to the males. They're actually more of an enigma.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Female Forsaken strength : a new post - 19/11/2009 04:12:35 PM 1994 Views
Except... - 19/11/2009 04:26:32 PM 1010 Views
There's no evidence for that - 19/11/2009 04:31:17 PM 984 Views
It's common sense - 19/11/2009 04:40:01 PM 896 Views
No, it's based on absolutely nothing - 19/11/2009 04:50:30 PM 1032 Views
If you agree that there are stronger damane than Alivia... - 19/11/2009 05:00:05 PM 884 Views
I didn't say that - 19/11/2009 05:07:33 PM 940 Views
Well, I think you are wrong... - 19/11/2009 05:35:27 PM 920 Views
Glad to have you back. Now for the arguments to start! - 19/11/2009 04:29:01 PM 1056 Views
Hmm... - 19/11/2009 04:47:12 PM 1057 Views
Actually, you are the one placing Lanfear immensely high, my list reduced the strength difference... - 19/11/2009 05:05:18 PM 1135 Views
But I'm not - 19/11/2009 05:17:05 PM 1014 Views
Let me ask you this... - 19/11/2009 10:13:12 PM 1067 Views
Very good point *NM* - 20/11/2009 01:38:55 AM 464 Views
One possibility - 20/11/2009 03:18:55 AM 987 Views
All assumption - 20/11/2009 04:11:20 AM 951 Views
Why introduce that concept, if it is just of academic importance? - 20/11/2009 07:41:54 AM 877 Views
You don't know the significance of it at all - 20/11/2009 03:14:46 PM 1017 Views
Why? - 20/11/2009 03:17:51 PM 1547 Views
Re: Why? - 20/11/2009 04:30:50 PM 913 Views
How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)... - 20/11/2009 05:07:39 PM 903 Views
Re: How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)... - 21/11/2009 10:55:47 AM 912 Views
Is Graendal the only Forsaken NOT to overstate her own ability then? - 21/11/2009 01:53:28 PM 1027 Views
Probably not in this case - 21/11/2009 11:34:25 PM 897 Views
Your rankings hinge ENTIRELY on whether you have Graendal correctly placed. - 20/11/2009 03:24:22 PM 921 Views
Yeah... entirely - 20/11/2009 04:33:45 PM 874 Views
Okay, "entirely" was a bad choice of word. - 20/11/2009 09:57:52 PM 901 Views
Re: Okay, "entirely" was a bad choice of word. - 21/11/2009 10:48:16 AM 992 Views
Re: Let me ask you this... - 23/12/2009 04:30:27 PM 942 Views
*correction*Re: Let me ask you this... - 23/12/2009 04:32:02 PM 906 Views
my comments w/ edit - 19/11/2009 04:37:27 PM 976 Views
Re: my comments w/ edit - 19/11/2009 04:54:30 PM 1058 Views
Re: my comments w/ edit - 23/12/2009 04:42:15 PM 838 Views
What ever happened to all teh info from wotmania? Especially the FAQs? *NM* - 19/11/2009 05:01:45 PM 613 Views
http://13depository.blogspot.com/ *NM* - 19/11/2009 05:31:01 PM 481 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post - 19/11/2009 05:39:10 PM 992 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post -- What about Dexterity?? - 19/11/2009 06:44:31 PM 1006 Views
This perfectly matches my understanding of the situation. - 19/11/2009 07:06:31 PM 862 Views
Agreed! This make more sense than the previous list *NM* - 20/11/2009 12:07:37 AM 519 Views
Too many levels - 20/11/2009 01:48:24 AM 980 Views
You are completely right about too many levels. - 20/11/2009 04:17:17 AM 870 Views
21 levels is largely a myth - 20/11/2009 04:27:27 AM 910 Views
Re: 21 levels is largely a myth - 20/11/2009 01:51:17 PM 1004 Views
Thanks for the post. Interesting stuff there. *NM* - 20/11/2009 03:14:12 PM 444 Views
That's good to know. - 20/11/2009 07:56:41 PM 857 Views
I have to disagree for a couple of reasons. - 20/11/2009 04:14:40 AM 1027 Views
Talaan is not stronger than Nynaeve - 28/11/2009 08:27:22 PM 1126 Views
Re: Talaan is not stronger than Nynaeve - 28/11/2009 10:05:15 PM 1131 Views
Talaan has be channeling for 6 or 7 years - 28/11/2009 10:56:12 PM 906 Views
Re: I have to disagree for a couple of reasons. - 30/12/2009 12:37:40 AM 1341 Views
Agree with nearly all - 20/11/2009 04:43:47 AM 848 Views
more hopefully to come - 20/11/2009 08:15:00 PM 829 Views
Thanks KCF, that's a great question to ask. - 20/11/2009 08:28:32 PM 1086 Views
A little more evidence that Nynaeve is stronger than Semirhage - 29/11/2009 12:12:37 AM 931 Views
I agree that Graendal is the 2nd most powerful woman Forsaken - 29/11/2009 04:07:00 PM 840 Views
It's possible - 30/11/2009 08:23:28 PM 892 Views
Re: It's possible - 01/12/2009 06:18:56 PM 961 Views

Reply to Message