Of course at least some of them are hold by the Empress or Tuon, because as the rulers of Seanchan they naturally have the privileges to get these damane. They also have e.g. the best fighters and the most powerful ter'angreal. Since a super strong damane would be very helpful for Tuon on her war, it furthermore simply makes sense that Sera is one of these super strong. Therefore any list ignoring Sera is most likely wrong, IMO.
But as said, maybe BS will clarify it.
But as said, maybe BS will clarify it.
Alivia is the strongest damane we know. There may or may not be a damane or some damane who equal or exceed her. We might never know.
Tuon said that Sera was the strongest of her damane - out of six in attendance. To make the leap that Sera is high Forsaken strength is illogical IMO. Egwene was special enough that they wanted to present her to the Empress for her abilities. It doesn't mean she's Lanfear.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Fan of Lanfear
Female Forsaken strength : a new post
- 19/11/2009 04:12:35 PM
1935 Views
Except...
- 19/11/2009 04:26:32 PM
958 Views
There's no evidence for that
- 19/11/2009 04:31:17 PM
899 Views
I agree with Sidious - we have no evidence at this time, so she should remain off the list
- 19/11/2009 04:38:31 PM
910 Views
It's common sense
- 19/11/2009 04:40:01 PM
831 Views
No, it's based on absolutely nothing
- 19/11/2009 04:50:30 PM
964 Views
If you agree that there are stronger damane than Alivia...
- 19/11/2009 05:00:05 PM
833 Views
I didn't say that
- 19/11/2009 05:07:33 PM
874 Views
Glad to have you back. Now for the arguments to start!
- 19/11/2009 04:29:01 PM
986 Views
Hmm...
- 19/11/2009 04:47:12 PM
988 Views
Actually, you are the one placing Lanfear immensely high, my list reduced the strength difference...
- 19/11/2009 05:05:18 PM
1078 Views
But I'm not
- 19/11/2009 05:17:05 PM
946 Views
Let me ask you this...
- 19/11/2009 10:13:12 PM
994 Views
All assumption
- 20/11/2009 04:11:20 AM
891 Views
Why introduce that concept, if it is just of academic importance?
- 20/11/2009 07:41:54 AM
816 Views
You don't know the significance of it at all
- 20/11/2009 03:14:46 PM
956 Views
Why?
- 20/11/2009 03:17:51 PM
1476 Views
Re: Why?
- 20/11/2009 04:30:50 PM
845 Views
How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)...
- 20/11/2009 05:07:39 PM
841 Views
Re: How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)...
- 21/11/2009 10:55:47 AM
851 Views
Is Graendal the only Forsaken NOT to overstate her own ability then?
- 21/11/2009 01:53:28 PM
968 Views
Your rankings hinge ENTIRELY on whether you have Graendal correctly placed.
- 20/11/2009 03:24:22 PM
840 Views
Yeah... entirely
- 20/11/2009 04:33:45 PM
802 Views
- 20/11/2009 04:33:45 PM
802 Views
What ever happened to all teh info from wotmania? Especially the FAQs? *NM*
- 19/11/2009 05:01:45 PM
582 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post
- 19/11/2009 05:39:10 PM
930 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post -- What about Dexterity??
- 19/11/2009 06:44:31 PM
925 Views
Seems good, except I'd bunch up the upper levels and place Nynaeve a little higher. *NM*
- 19/11/2009 09:46:16 PM
471 Views
Too many levels
- 20/11/2009 01:48:24 AM
928 Views
21 levels is largely a myth
- 20/11/2009 04:27:27 AM
838 Views
I have to disagree for a couple of reasons.
- 20/11/2009 04:14:40 AM
962 Views
I thought of something else to support my upper limit theory on gateways
- 20/11/2009 01:53:05 PM
977 Views
Talaan is not stronger than Nynaeve
- 28/11/2009 08:27:22 PM
1059 Views
more hopefully to come
- 20/11/2009 08:15:00 PM
774 Views
Thanks KCF, that's a great question to ask.
- 20/11/2009 08:28:32 PM
1019 Views
I'm the same way. I should be studying for law school finals, but I'm distracted. *NM*
- 20/11/2009 09:45:46 PM
386 Views
I agree that Graendal is the 2nd most powerful woman Forsaken
- 29/11/2009 04:07:00 PM
779 Views
