Active Users:957 Time:07/08/2025 01:35:25 AM
Are we speaking english? NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM

That death has a different meaning to us then to WoT characters, particularly when it concern the Forsaken reincarnation.


Since our Death definition takes precedence over the definition made by these fictional characters in their fictional world your arguments rest on shaky ground.

This is my point entirely! You CANNOT redifine the words to suit yourself.
Since you want to use WoT as and example I will cite Enyclopedia Wot, considered by many many many people to be an expert resource on all thing WoT. If you look up Aginor, his entry basically ends with his death in EoTW. Yes his DEATH! Osan'gar appears later. He is Aginor's soul reincarnated, but he is NOT Aginor! Aginor is dead! My point is that you can say that Cyndane is Lanfear reincarnated but Lanfear had to die before Cyndane appeared. That means that she was killed.
You can possibly make the argument that the death was not as effective due to the intercedence of the DO (the ultimate deus ex machina) but you cannot say that an AS (Moiraine) neither killed Lanfear or caused her to be killed. To blame the AS for her reincarnation as Cyndane is ignorant and short sighted. Since this ignorance was the main point of the original poster, I called him on it.

NaCl(you can argue all you want but the AS killed 3 Forsaken, the fact that they came back doesn't mean they weren't killed)H2O +<img class=' />
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 19/11/2009 at 08:09:30 PM
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1363 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 933 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 463 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 331 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 878 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 701 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 820 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 726 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 716 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 649 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 750 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 696 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 649 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 718 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 642 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 896 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 706 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 672 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 406 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 807 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 656 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 323 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 424 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 683 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 608 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 636 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 585 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 626 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 631 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 671 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 595 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 561 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 761 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 601 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 615 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 600 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 814 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 685 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 737 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 677 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 647 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 774 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 882 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 575 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 648 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 632 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 746 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 597 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 298 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 622 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 580 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 679 Views

Reply to Message