Active Users:2321 Time:18/06/2026 12:30:18 AM
Are we speaking english? NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM

That death has a different meaning to us then to WoT characters, particularly when it concern the Forsaken reincarnation.


Since our Death definition takes precedence over the definition made by these fictional characters in their fictional world your arguments rest on shaky ground.

This is my point entirely! You CANNOT redifine the words to suit yourself.
Since you want to use WoT as and example I will cite Enyclopedia Wot, considered by many many many people to be an expert resource on all thing WoT. If you look up Aginor, his entry basically ends with his death in EoTW. Yes his DEATH! Osan'gar appears later. He is Aginor's soul reincarnated, but he is NOT Aginor! Aginor is dead! My point is that you can say that Cyndane is Lanfear reincarnated but Lanfear had to die before Cyndane appeared. That means that she was killed.
You can possibly make the argument that the death was not as effective due to the intercedence of the DO (the ultimate deus ex machina) but you cannot say that an AS (Moiraine) neither killed Lanfear or caused her to be killed. To blame the AS for her reincarnation as Cyndane is ignorant and short sighted. Since this ignorance was the main point of the original poster, I called him on it.

NaCl(you can argue all you want but the AS killed 3 Forsaken, the fact that they came back doesn't mean they weren't killed)H2O +<img class=' />
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 19/11/2009 at 08:09:30 PM
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1494 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 1070 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 521 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 397 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 1036 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 843 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 954 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 877 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 858 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 811 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 892 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 848 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 793 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 874 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 775 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 1031 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 838 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 826 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 467 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 941 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 819 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 380 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 507 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 842 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 753 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 764 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 733 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 768 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 764 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 847 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 733 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 706 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 901 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 769 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 750 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 742 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 963 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 815 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 869 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 815 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 789 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 916 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 1013 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 713 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 786 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 771 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 886 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 745 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 360 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 771 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 722 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 800 Views

Reply to Message