Active Users:408 Time:04/12/2025 03:54:10 PM
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... Etzel Send a noteboard - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM
There's no reason she would have mentioned it in her PoV (by your reasoning) unless she felt it was significant. Maybe she didn't.


That's correct. One should remember, though, that Graendal had five longer PoV, while Slayer had only one pretty short PoV.

However, there was no reason for one of them to necessarily mention Asmo's death in the past, if they were the killer. Therefore the argument that Slayer has to mention Asmo, if he mentions the 2 BA, and is otherwise basically ruled out, holds no water at all.

Yet, since Graendal is obviously dead now and nothing suggests that she will ever have a PoV again - while Slayer definitely will be in ToM & possibly AMoL (likely with a PoV) - BS will certainly get the opportunity to reveal the mystery concerning Asmo's death in Slayer's PoV, as RJ said the revelation would probably happen in the killer's PoV.
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1378 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 810 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 937 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 914 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 758 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 721 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 747 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 638 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 612 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 651 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 779 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 786 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 626 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 710 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 819 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 770 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 694 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 294 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 289 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 770 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 907 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 274 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 285 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 619 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 712 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 280 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 721 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 775 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 769 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 649 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 791 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 705 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 656 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 735 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 643 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 598 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 889 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 301 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 280 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 637 Views

Reply to Message