Yet, since Graendal is obviously dead now and nothing suggests that she will ever have a PoV again - while Slayer definitely will be in ToM & possibly AMoL (likely with a PoV) - BS will certainly get the opportunity to reveal the mystery concerning Asmo's death in Slayer's PoV, as RJ said the revelation would probably happen in the killer's PoV.
how this is not an important argument or one that carries much weight among the people who believe Graendal did it; they just assume that RJ's "probably" didn't turn out that way, what with Sanderson taking over.
So you can repeat this as often as you like, but I don't think there's much of a point to it unless you're preaching to the choir of those who share your conviction about Slayer...
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory
14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM
- 1251 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that.
14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM
- 700 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books...
14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM
- 811 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal
14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM
- 811 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV
14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM
- 654 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes.
14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM
- 620 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV
14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM
- 631 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny.
20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM
- 548 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it
20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM
- 499 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either.
20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM
- 537 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo...
20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM
- 676 Views
I'm sure you can see...
20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM
- 629 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much.
14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM
- 609 Views
That's wrong
14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM
- 718 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong.
15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM
- 643 Views
right here
15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM
- 591 Views
If Graendal's name is mentioned, then "Graendal" is in the book. *NM*
15/11/2009 12:13:57 PM
- 267 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM*
15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM
- 259 Views
BS never would have figured it out himself that Graendal did it? *NM*
14/11/2009 05:20:19 PM
- 255 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that.
19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM
- 813 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws...
14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM
- 604 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson.
14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM
- 669 Views
No. Try again.
14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM
- 676 Views
Ok, I will stay alert for further blows to Graendaldunnit, if this didn't already convince you!
*NM*
15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM
- 235 Views

Actually this is more against the Slayer theory
15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM
- 599 Views
Nonsense...
15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM
- 571 Views
Your tenacity is impressive.
15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM
- 624 Views

Absolut statements in such discussions...
15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM
- 553 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions...
15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM
- 499 Views