How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)...
Shannow Send a noteboard - 20/11/2009 05:07:39 PM
About your last sentence. Who says Graendal and Semirhage are not on the same level? Give me one quote that proves otherwise?
In fact, give me a convincing argument that even strongly SUGGESTS otherwise?
In fact, give me a convincing argument that even strongly SUGGESTS otherwise?
I was talking about Cyndane.
We don't have a single comparative quote between Graendal and Semirhage, or even between Graendal and Nynaeve, which would allow us to extrapolate to Semirhage.
Well exactly! So what's all this crap about the thematic significance of Semirhage being stronger than Cyndane. Even you admit that Semirhage is an enigma.
I just chuckled to myself at your last comment.
May I ask then, after admitting what you just did in that last paragraph, on what possible basis do you put Graendal THREE LEVELS higher than Semirhage?
This message last edited by Shannow on 20/11/2009 at 07:51:43 PM
Female Forsaken strength : a new post
- 19/11/2009 04:12:35 PM
1908 Views
Except...
- 19/11/2009 04:26:32 PM
932 Views
There's no evidence for that
- 19/11/2009 04:31:17 PM
877 Views
I agree with Sidious - we have no evidence at this time, so she should remain off the list
- 19/11/2009 04:38:31 PM
887 Views
It's common sense
- 19/11/2009 04:40:01 PM
804 Views
No, it's based on absolutely nothing
- 19/11/2009 04:50:30 PM
929 Views
If you agree that there are stronger damane than Alivia...
- 19/11/2009 05:00:05 PM
806 Views
Glad to have you back. Now for the arguments to start!
- 19/11/2009 04:29:01 PM
963 Views
Hmm...
- 19/11/2009 04:47:12 PM
963 Views
Actually, you are the one placing Lanfear immensely high, my list reduced the strength difference...
- 19/11/2009 05:05:18 PM
1050 Views
But I'm not
- 19/11/2009 05:17:05 PM
928 Views
Let me ask you this...
- 19/11/2009 10:13:12 PM
969 Views
All assumption
- 20/11/2009 04:11:20 AM
860 Views
Why introduce that concept, if it is just of academic importance?
- 20/11/2009 07:41:54 AM
783 Views
You don't know the significance of it at all
- 20/11/2009 03:14:46 PM
927 Views
Why?
- 20/11/2009 03:17:51 PM
1445 Views
Re: Why?
- 20/11/2009 04:30:50 PM
818 Views
How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)...
- 20/11/2009 05:07:39 PM
824 Views
Re: How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)...
- 21/11/2009 10:55:47 AM
827 Views
Is Graendal the only Forsaken NOT to overstate her own ability then?
- 21/11/2009 01:53:28 PM
946 Views
Your rankings hinge ENTIRELY on whether you have Graendal correctly placed.
- 20/11/2009 03:24:22 PM
815 Views
Yeah... entirely
- 20/11/2009 04:33:45 PM
778 Views
- 20/11/2009 04:33:45 PM
778 Views
What ever happened to all teh info from wotmania? Especially the FAQs? *NM*
- 19/11/2009 05:01:45 PM
569 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post
- 19/11/2009 05:39:10 PM
902 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post -- What about Dexterity??
- 19/11/2009 06:44:31 PM
897 Views
Seems good, except I'd bunch up the upper levels and place Nynaeve a little higher. *NM*
- 19/11/2009 09:46:16 PM
463 Views
Too many levels
- 20/11/2009 01:48:24 AM
891 Views
21 levels is largely a myth
- 20/11/2009 04:27:27 AM
808 Views
I have to disagree for a couple of reasons.
- 20/11/2009 04:14:40 AM
930 Views
I thought of something else to support my upper limit theory on gateways
- 20/11/2009 01:53:05 PM
942 Views
Talaan is not stronger than Nynaeve
- 28/11/2009 08:27:22 PM
1022 Views
more hopefully to come
- 20/11/2009 08:15:00 PM
747 Views
Thanks KCF, that's a great question to ask.
- 20/11/2009 08:28:32 PM
997 Views
I'm the same way. I should be studying for law school finals, but I'm distracted. *NM*
- 20/11/2009 09:45:46 PM
380 Views
I agree that Graendal is the 2nd most powerful woman Forsaken
- 29/11/2009 04:07:00 PM
759 Views
