Active Users:650 Time:04/08/2025 06:21:06 AM
The Oaths focus on INTENT beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 06/12/2009 10:01:27 PM
(I'm working this out as I type it, so bear with me. I think I'm right, though)

Basically, the Oaths aren't a kind of mystical binding- they're just a very specific form of applied Compulsion.


A stick of ivory doesn't know what a lie is. Weaves of Spirit can't tell if you're using the Power offensively or defensively.

But YOU can.

What the Oath Rod does, I'm fairly sure, is make it so you are unable to consciously violate any oath you make on it.

So "To speak no word that is not true" could LOGICALLY forbid sarcasm. It would also logically not do anything, because any word by itself is not a lie. As many have noted, it's not nearly as ironclad an oath as it sounds.


But what matters is what the Aes Sedai (or whoever swears the Oath) thinks. So, the swearer considers speaking a lie saying a "word that is not true." If there's any doubt, even subconsciously, the swearer would not be able to say the lie.

However, something like casual sarcasm, where the speaker knows she isn't intending to lie, and isn't attempting to be deceitful? No problem.




Another example: The "no Power as a weapon" rule. Except in the last defense of life of yourself, a sister, or your Warder.

What does "last defense" mean? Well, you could rationalize it to mean that an army charging at you from half a mile away makes it the "last defense." But wouldn't running away also be a defense? Shouldn't you not be able to make heads explode until you see the arrows coming at you?

Two equally valid interpretations, but the Oath Rod focuses on intent- if the Aes Sedai rationalizes "there's no way I could run away; they'd catch me and kill me" then that's that. The Oath Rod doesn't compute run speed and terrain conditions- the Aes Sedai does.


One last example- "make no weapon for a man to kill another man." What about women killing men, or men killing women? What about weapons for men to kill Shadowspawn? What about weapons without a purpose, that they'll just leave in a big pile over on that table and hope no one takes them, wink wink?


--------
The Aes Sedai have the intent of the Oaths drilled into them long before they ever lay hands on that ivory Rod- so it's very hard, I'd say almost impossible, for them to deviate from the accepted interpretations. Most people don't see using sarcasm as lying, especially when your listeners know you're being sarcastic. The First Oath means "I will not lie," so an Aes Sedai can't lie. But sarcasm? No problem.
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
Cadsuane lies! - 06/12/2009 06:10:41 PM 2148 Views
Re: Cadsuane lies! - 06/12/2009 06:18:39 PM 1354 Views
Sarcasm is one thing - 06/12/2009 06:43:12 PM 1071 Views
I disagree - 06/12/2009 06:51:27 PM 1028 Views
RJ has said they're allowed to be sarcastic - 06/12/2009 07:07:32 PM 983 Views
How does that jive with the Oaths? - 06/12/2009 07:13:21 PM 1033 Views
Good point, but in that same book Tamra said that Gitara didn't say anything before dying *NM* - 06/12/2009 07:53:31 PM 474 Views
Re: Good point, but in that same book Tamra said that Gitara didn't say anything before dying - 06/12/2009 08:03:36 PM 1077 Views
Yes, she did state it. - 06/12/2009 08:57:47 PM 1004 Views
Re: Yes, she did state it. - 07/12/2009 01:39:07 AM 991 Views
Re: How does that jive with the Oaths? - 06/12/2009 07:57:10 PM 930 Views
The Oaths focus on INTENT - 06/12/2009 10:01:27 PM 986 Views
None of what you describe is an Oath ingrained into your bones. - 07/12/2009 01:52:49 AM 856 Views
It's ENTIRELY about self-rationalization - 07/12/2009 03:59:00 AM 835 Views
^This. *NM* - 07/12/2009 08:23:27 AM 464 Views
Because it isn't a lie - 06/12/2009 07:44:29 PM 995 Views
I understand this, I'm not arguing that an AS should not be able to be sarcastic - 06/12/2009 08:08:15 PM 977 Views
Verin didn't say it sarcastically. - 06/12/2009 08:11:31 PM 822 Views
Really? I never would have known that without you - 06/12/2009 08:39:56 PM 913 Views
Re: I understand this, I'm not arguing that an AS should not be able to be sarcastic - 06/12/2009 08:35:23 PM 1019 Views
Quote for you - 06/12/2009 08:42:52 PM 948 Views
Re: Quote for you - 07/12/2009 01:30:57 AM 875 Views
The sarcasm was for him repeating himself to her. The "remember" is the part she's refering to. - 07/12/2009 10:15:06 AM 790 Views
That's why I think this example of sarcasm works as opposed to Cadsuane who makes a false statement - 07/12/2009 03:17:52 PM 859 Views
sarcasm is sarcasm. In both instances their is technically a lie. - 07/12/2009 11:28:02 PM 807 Views
Not at all the case - 07/12/2009 11:58:42 PM 897 Views
Do you really believe he waited till the last minute to tell Seonid? - 14/12/2009 01:32:37 PM 972 Views
That's the whole point of her being able to say what she did! - 14/12/2009 04:05:24 PM 751 Views
What about the Sheriam thing? - 07/12/2009 01:49:32 PM 887 Views
Re: What about the Sheriam thing? - 07/12/2009 02:15:25 PM 763 Views
I actually don't take it as proof. - 07/12/2009 09:00:58 PM 822 Views
Yeah, I thought about that possibility too... - 07/12/2009 10:21:16 PM 1116 Views
Sarcasm - 06/12/2009 07:14:47 PM 1019 Views
It's obviously meant to be sarcasm, I just don't like - 06/12/2009 07:18:40 PM 817 Views
Here is what RJ said about it - 06/12/2009 07:41:18 PM 975 Views
Well I have to say I think RJ made the wrong call with this one *NM* - 06/12/2009 07:43:47 PM 421 Views
Like my momma used to say... - 06/12/2009 11:27:22 PM 857 Views
Your momma is a wise woman. - 07/12/2009 03:14:27 PM 768 Views
Agreed. - 07/12/2009 01:45:39 AM 771 Views
You can already drive a truck through the oaths. Does this one additional tiny gap really matter? - 07/12/2009 04:07:16 AM 811 Views
Alys (Moiraine alias) *NM* - 07/12/2009 05:13:18 AM 1128 Views
No, no it doesn't. - 08/12/2009 03:31:11 PM 786 Views
Re: No, no it doesn't. - 08/12/2009 04:41:42 PM 816 Views
what do you think a RL lie detector would tell in this case? - 07/12/2009 12:27:07 PM 773 Views
in RL you would get warned by the investigator to cooperate - 07/12/2009 01:04:33 PM 794 Views
But how would the machine reading indicate? - 07/12/2009 07:04:22 PM 803 Views
Where's the problem? - 09/12/2009 04:18:40 PM 727 Views
It's in the way the Oath is worded - 09/12/2009 05:14:39 PM 788 Views
Re: It's in the way the Oath is worded - 09/12/2009 05:36:59 PM 806 Views
See the Cadsuane quote, but I'll give you another one - 09/12/2009 06:15:32 PM 1002 Views
PS You misread my original quote - 09/12/2009 11:00:56 PM 733 Views
You're so right. My fault. *NM* - 10/12/2009 12:57:29 AM 718 Views
No worries! It a discussion forum, we're supposed to discuss - 10/12/2009 12:58:39 AM 814 Views
Re: PS You misread my original quote - 28/12/2009 10:04:51 PM 915 Views
Lies, untruths, sarcasm, and meaning - 09/12/2009 07:46:25 PM 864 Views
We are starting understand each other - 09/12/2009 10:09:41 PM 828 Views
Re: We are starting understand each other - 10/12/2009 01:03:08 AM 770 Views
Completely agree - 10/12/2009 01:23:36 AM 822 Views
Why do you think she *had* noticed the Aiel? *NM* - 14/12/2009 02:02:24 PM 356 Views
because she arrived with Rand and dozens of Maidens, - 15/12/2009 01:02:43 AM 762 Views

Reply to Message