But surely an Aes Sedai can answer a question she hasn't fully heard yet.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 07/12/2009 03:06:34 PM
Sheriam betrayed herself by anticipating the question and giving the wrong answer. Under the first oath, such a slip isn't possible. The first oath should have stopped her answering at all until/unless she heard the question, or else to answer differently, by a true statement (eg: Q: are your hair red? A
f course I'm not Black Ajah or Of course, I'm not). She could not answer a question she had not heard with just "of course not" - the binder would have prevented it. If she thinks she knows what the question that's coming is, it's not intent to lie if she answers it before the question has been spoken, or before she has realized what it is. I don't know if we've seen any examples of that, but if it's all about intent, it would make little sense that an Aes Sedai found herself unable to give the perfectly honest answer she wanted to give.
Cadsuane lies!
- 06/12/2009 06:10:41 PM
2368 Views
Re: Cadsuane lies!
- 06/12/2009 06:18:39 PM
1579 Views
Sarcasm is one thing
- 06/12/2009 06:43:12 PM
1264 Views
I disagree
- 06/12/2009 06:51:27 PM
1234 Views
RJ has said they're allowed to be sarcastic
- 06/12/2009 07:07:32 PM
1177 Views
How does that jive with the Oaths?
- 06/12/2009 07:13:21 PM
1232 Views
Good point, but in that same book Tamra said that Gitara didn't say anything before dying *NM*
- 06/12/2009 07:53:31 PM
572 Views
Re: Good point, but in that same book Tamra said that Gitara didn't say anything before dying
- 06/12/2009 08:03:36 PM
1300 Views
The Oaths focus on INTENT
- 06/12/2009 10:01:27 PM
1211 Views
Because it isn't a lie
- 06/12/2009 07:44:29 PM
1233 Views
I understand this, I'm not arguing that an AS should not be able to be sarcastic
- 06/12/2009 08:08:15 PM
1201 Views
Re: I understand this, I'm not arguing that an AS should not be able to be sarcastic
- 06/12/2009 08:35:23 PM
1226 Views
Quote for you
- 06/12/2009 08:42:52 PM
1173 Views
The sarcasm was for him repeating himself to her. The "remember" is the part she's refering to.
- 07/12/2009 10:15:06 AM
999 Views
That's why I think this example of sarcasm works as opposed to Cadsuane who makes a false statement
- 07/12/2009 03:17:52 PM
1067 Views
sarcasm is sarcasm. In both instances their is technically a lie.
- 07/12/2009 11:28:02 PM
1011 Views
Not at all the case
- 07/12/2009 11:58:42 PM
1079 Views
Do you really believe he waited till the last minute to tell Seonid?
- 14/12/2009 01:32:37 PM
1178 Views
What about the Sheriam thing?
- 07/12/2009 01:49:32 PM
1094 Views
Re: What about the Sheriam thing?
- 07/12/2009 02:15:25 PM
962 Views
But surely an Aes Sedai can answer a question she hasn't fully heard yet.
- 07/12/2009 03:06:34 PM
1206 Views
Sarcasm
- 06/12/2009 07:14:47 PM
1238 Views
It's obviously meant to be sarcasm, I just don't like
- 06/12/2009 07:18:40 PM
1037 Views
Here is what RJ said about it
- 06/12/2009 07:41:18 PM
1198 Views
Well I have to say I think RJ made the wrong call with this one *NM*
- 06/12/2009 07:43:47 PM
513 Views
Agreed.
- 07/12/2009 01:45:39 AM
997 Views
You can already drive a truck through the oaths. Does this one additional tiny gap really matter?
- 07/12/2009 04:07:16 AM
1046 Views
what do you think a RL lie detector would tell in this case?
- 07/12/2009 12:27:07 PM
977 Views
in RL you would get warned by the investigator to cooperate
- 07/12/2009 01:04:33 PM
1021 Views
But how would the machine reading indicate?
- 07/12/2009 07:04:22 PM
994 Views
Usually you're s'possed to answer with a yes or no. It's easy to tell when you're evasive
- 09/12/2009 10:46:58 PM
1050 Views
Where's the problem?
- 09/12/2009 04:18:40 PM
936 Views
It's in the way the Oath is worded
- 09/12/2009 05:14:39 PM
1006 Views
PS You misread my original quote
- 09/12/2009 11:00:56 PM
926 Views
Lies, untruths, sarcasm, and meaning
- 09/12/2009 07:46:25 PM
1098 Views
We are starting understand each other
- 09/12/2009 10:09:41 PM
1059 Views


