That's the whole point of her being able to say what she did!
darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 14/12/2009 04:05:24 PM
Seonid's comment is made right after Perrin had just told her all of the information. Her words are absolutely true, her intent was sarcastic.
Cadsuane's words were sarcastic, with truth as the intent.
I don't refuse to see anything, it's crystal clear what the intention of all of this is ... my argument is in the way the Oath is worded... not that AS shouldn't be capable of sarcasm...
For example:
If Siuan was unable to exaggerate her situation to someone who knew damn well that it was an exaggeration. If intent was the only thing that mattered she should have been able to do this just as easily as Cadsuane did.
IMO the Oath should still prevent an AS from wording sarcasm as outright lies... she should have been forced to say this in a different way, such as "Thank you for that keen observation"
Cadsuane's words were sarcastic, with truth as the intent.
I don't refuse to see anything, it's crystal clear what the intention of all of this is ... my argument is in the way the Oath is worded... not that AS shouldn't be capable of sarcasm...
For example:
If Siuan was unable to exaggerate her situation to someone who knew damn well that it was an exaggeration. If intent was the only thing that mattered she should have been able to do this just as easily as Cadsuane did.
IMO the Oath should still prevent an AS from wording sarcasm as outright lies... she should have been forced to say this in a different way, such as "Thank you for that keen observation"
A word derives it's meaning from two or more people agreeing to what it means. In some instances that means the tone dictates the meaning as much as the basic sounds.
The sky is blue. The sky is blue! and The sky is blue? all mean different things. same words. If you change the word blue to green. Only one of them would be a lie. If we were to make a punctuation for sarcasm you would accept the indicator of tone and how it changes the meaning of the words.
Seonid's tone indicated that not only was MOST of Perrin's information INTUITIVE but that the vital information had already been shared previously. So it WAS a lie that she would not have known that information if Perrin hadn't told her. The very premise of sarcasm is to claim ignorance or need of enlightenment while making it clear that you are not ignorant or are more enlightened than the person you are speaking to. You can not have sarcasm without a lie.
IMO she was making it clear that he'd told her much the same information half a dozen time already and that she was irritated by being treated like an idiot. Most of Perrin's information was intel gotten from the Aiel sent into the same tunnel earlier in the book.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Cadsuane lies!
- 06/12/2009 06:10:41 PM
2225 Views
Re: Cadsuane lies!
- 06/12/2009 06:18:39 PM
1433 Views
Sarcasm is one thing
- 06/12/2009 06:43:12 PM
1144 Views
I disagree
- 06/12/2009 06:51:27 PM
1097 Views
RJ has said they're allowed to be sarcastic
- 06/12/2009 07:07:32 PM
1054 Views
How does that jive with the Oaths?
- 06/12/2009 07:13:21 PM
1104 Views
Good point, but in that same book Tamra said that Gitara didn't say anything before dying *NM*
- 06/12/2009 07:53:31 PM
511 Views
Re: Good point, but in that same book Tamra said that Gitara didn't say anything before dying
- 06/12/2009 08:03:36 PM
1148 Views
The Oaths focus on INTENT
- 06/12/2009 10:01:27 PM
1081 Views
Because it isn't a lie
- 06/12/2009 07:44:29 PM
1081 Views
I understand this, I'm not arguing that an AS should not be able to be sarcastic
- 06/12/2009 08:08:15 PM
1063 Views
Re: I understand this, I'm not arguing that an AS should not be able to be sarcastic
- 06/12/2009 08:35:23 PM
1088 Views
Quote for you
- 06/12/2009 08:42:52 PM
1019 Views
The sarcasm was for him repeating himself to her. The "remember" is the part she's refering to.
- 07/12/2009 10:15:06 AM
856 Views
That's why I think this example of sarcasm works as opposed to Cadsuane who makes a false statement
- 07/12/2009 03:17:52 PM
929 Views
sarcasm is sarcasm. In both instances their is technically a lie.
- 07/12/2009 11:28:02 PM
876 Views
Not at all the case
- 07/12/2009 11:58:42 PM
960 Views
Do you really believe he waited till the last minute to tell Seonid?
- 14/12/2009 01:32:37 PM
1030 Views
That's the whole point of her being able to say what she did!
- 14/12/2009 04:05:24 PM
817 Views
What about the Sheriam thing?
- 07/12/2009 01:49:32 PM
950 Views
Re: What about the Sheriam thing?
- 07/12/2009 02:15:25 PM
823 Views
But surely an Aes Sedai can answer a question she hasn't fully heard yet.
- 07/12/2009 03:06:34 PM
1064 Views
Sarcasm
- 06/12/2009 07:14:47 PM
1097 Views
It's obviously meant to be sarcasm, I just don't like
- 06/12/2009 07:18:40 PM
898 Views
Here is what RJ said about it
- 06/12/2009 07:41:18 PM
1046 Views
Well I have to say I think RJ made the wrong call with this one *NM*
- 06/12/2009 07:43:47 PM
453 Views
Agreed.
- 07/12/2009 01:45:39 AM
864 Views
You can already drive a truck through the oaths. Does this one additional tiny gap really matter?
- 07/12/2009 04:07:16 AM
889 Views
what do you think a RL lie detector would tell in this case?
- 07/12/2009 12:27:07 PM
832 Views
in RL you would get warned by the investigator to cooperate
- 07/12/2009 01:04:33 PM
862 Views
But how would the machine reading indicate?
- 07/12/2009 07:04:22 PM
863 Views
Usually you're s'possed to answer with a yes or no. It's easy to tell when you're evasive
- 09/12/2009 10:46:58 PM
902 Views
Where's the problem?
- 09/12/2009 04:18:40 PM
811 Views
It's in the way the Oath is worded
- 09/12/2009 05:14:39 PM
860 Views
PS You misread my original quote
- 09/12/2009 11:00:56 PM
797 Views
Lies, untruths, sarcasm, and meaning
- 09/12/2009 07:46:25 PM
932 Views
We are starting understand each other
- 09/12/2009 10:09:41 PM
904 Views


