Active Users:735 Time:05/08/2025 10:43:38 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
To show the relationship between Fain and DO Bonden Send a noteboard - 28/12/2009 03:52:59 PM
Why did RJ show us that Fain captured and broke this Myrddraal in TSR, followed by some arrangement between them, and finally let Faim take the Myrddraal to Caemlyn in LoC?

Is the reason that RJ just wanted to point out that Fain can control a Myrddraal (which are anyway "cannon fodder" in your words)? Or might it be a little detail, which is largely overlooked, but might become important in ToM and/or AMoL? (the books will apparently feature Fain and Slayer, according to BS)


I think obviously that relationship will come into play in the end, but I don't think the Fade will be that important, its role was to show us another aspect of the Mordeth / DO polarity.
Reply to message
Fain's Myrddraal Etzel - 28/12/2009 01:45:58 PM 1879 Views
Nope, Myrddraal have been nothing but cannon fodder since book four *NM* Lordling - 28/12/2009 03:01:01 PM 459 Views
except, of course, for Shaidar Haran *NM* darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 03:12:17 PM 466 Views
But what was the purpose then? Etzel - 28/12/2009 03:43:01 PM 850 Views
To show the relationship between Fain and DO Bonden - 28/12/2009 03:52:59 PM 807 Views
Maybe... Etzel - 28/12/2009 04:02:42 PM 875 Views
Re: Maybe... Bonden - 29/12/2009 03:58:57 AM 1077 Views
Re: Fain's Myrddraal RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 03:19:37 PM 847 Views
Slayer also hunts Rand Etzel - 28/12/2009 03:57:11 PM 856 Views
I think it's possible that Slayer could have killed Asmo darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 04:35:57 PM 775 Views
The explanations Etzel - 28/12/2009 05:06:02 PM 1031 Views
Perhaps, I still don't buy it, but if that's the way it turns out I won't be shocked darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 05:20:06 PM 956 Views
Your reaction would be similar to BS's then Etzel - 28/12/2009 05:57:44 PM 1903 Views
I don't really have a strong opinion on which suspect did it darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 06:03:07 PM 775 Views
Well... Etzel - 28/12/2009 06:42:16 PM 825 Views
Indeed *NM* darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 06:55:52 PM 416 Views
Re: The explanations RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 08:01:19 PM 709 Views
The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... Etzel - 28/12/2009 08:13:07 PM 814 Views
Re: The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 10:19:24 PM 878 Views
The reason is... Etzel - 29/12/2009 11:58:24 AM 856 Views
The reasoning is very weak. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 03:34:19 PM 848 Views
If you mean... Etzel - 29/12/2009 04:01:25 PM 924 Views
A few points darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 04:14:12 PM 780 Views
You are wrong... Etzel - 29/12/2009 04:25:09 PM 763 Views
Thanks for the quote .. obviously hadn't heard that one before! darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 04:31:37 PM 872 Views
Key word - "possibly" RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 04:38:46 PM 779 Views
As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. Etzel - 29/12/2009 05:06:47 PM 750 Views
Re: As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:08:09 PM 678 Views
Well, it protects you of Shadowspawn, not that bad. Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:12:04 PM 758 Views
I don't think what happened to Fain or Slayer are "gifts" darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:26:15 PM 681 Views
Slayer calls it "gifts" in his PoV Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:37:49 PM 725 Views
I think you are stretching the reality a bit darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:42:10 PM 764 Views
You confuse it a bit... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:57:07 PM 826 Views
I think you've got it backwards darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 07:12:02 PM 725 Views
However... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:16:08 PM 767 Views
I wasn't arguing that point darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 08:13:25 PM 989 Views
Some things don't have to be spelled out, if they are that clear... *NM* Etzel - 29/12/2009 08:18:05 PM 721 Views
clearly they do since people are discussing it! darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 09:37:00 PM 706 Views
Yes; it is not readily apparant that the mark was made with the TP. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:12:07 PM 763 Views
Sorry, but that is utter nonsense Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:24:54 PM 856 Views
You are incorrect; I'm actually thinking that you only skimmed certain sections! RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:38:37 PM 814 Views
Simply read the books and what the authors said... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:55:42 PM 768 Views
Sorry, I think you have an opinion and read everything to support it in this case. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:02:42 PM 737 Views
Ok, then we play dumb, if you like... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:14:58 PM 849 Views
Because the Dark One is not merely a super channeler. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:21:21 PM 868 Views
Well, I disagree of course... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:36:19 PM 982 Views
You are mistaken on quite a few counts. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 04:37:51 PM 931 Views
Actually... Etzel - 29/12/2009 05:04:54 PM 828 Views
BWB says... darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 05:48:40 PM 1069 Views
Exactly. *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:12:30 PM 385 Views
Well... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:18:08 PM 877 Views
Just pointing out that your comment about Lanfear and Moggy not being assassins darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:37:21 PM 776 Views
No... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:47:07 PM 973 Views
Re: No... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:00:20 PM 945 Views
Again... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:10:12 PM 703 Views
So you dismiss the actual assassinations the Forsaken have performed on-screen? RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:26:55 PM 738 Views
Again... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:47:57 PM 675 Views
I think any Forsaken is capable of doing it. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 08:05:10 PM 774 Views
Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. Etzel - 29/12/2009 08:16:50 PM 651 Views
Re: Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 09:21:23 PM 744 Views
She kidnapped the Sharan's ... who's to say she hasn't killed others? *NM* darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 08:17:28 PM 395 Views
Yeah, after TFoH! We are looking for clues before LoC, guys! *sigh* Etzel - 29/12/2009 08:31:13 PM 624 Views
Where did I say this was a clue to her doing it? darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 09:58:29 PM 865 Views
I don't say... Etzel - 30/12/2009 12:08:27 PM 928 Views
Most of what you are talking about with Slayer is discoverd after LoC darius_sedai - 30/12/2009 02:36:18 PM 836 Views
Re: Well... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:41:29 PM 750 Views
It becomes clear... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:59:03 PM 682 Views
Basically, you think Slayer killed him. I do not. Nor do I care. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:04:20 PM 659 Views
Fair enough. *NM* Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:17:22 PM 445 Views
Re: Slayer also hunts Rand RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 04:39:36 PM 932 Views
As said... Etzel - 28/12/2009 04:54:07 PM 753 Views
Re: As said... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 07:49:22 PM 751 Views
It's rather the TP, which makes Slayer inhuman... Etzel - 28/12/2009 08:21:20 PM 723 Views
makes you wonder darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 09:45:08 PM 799 Views
Re: makes you wonder RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 10:16:57 PM 804 Views
I think... Etzel - 29/12/2009 12:03:41 PM 717 Views
Fain's Myrddraal killed asmo LOL *NM* aldapelan - 29/12/2009 05:26:22 AM 449 Views
It is quite obvious that it was Mistress Laras. *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 03:35:36 PM 412 Views
Intuitively, even. *NM* Gher - 29/12/2009 06:03:13 PM 409 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes