Active Users:784 Time:05/08/2025 10:10:53 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Slayer also hunts Rand Etzel Send a noteboard - 28/12/2009 03:57:11 PM
like Asmo was one


Yet the Dark One indicated that it would have rather captured his soul for punishment and possible transmigration, which argues against his capability to defeat any channeler.

I think Slayer hunts weaker traitors and non-channelers.


Even after Slayer fails to kill Rand in Far Madding, because Rand already left his rooms, Slayer doesn't hesitate to offer his patron to try it again, not knowing if Rand is even still in Far Madding. Besides that, Slayer also tries to kill another channeler, namely Nynaeve, with his bow in TSR. This shows that Slayer doesn't hesitate at all to attack channelers.

And since even Min - who isn't a Top Assassin of the Shadow - manages to wound Semirhage twice with her knife, nothing suggests that Slayer wouldn't be able to kill Asmo, if he surprised him and maybe used a quick & deadly weapon like a crossbow with a poisoned bolt (RJ also said that Fain would have been able to kill Asmo, if he had been there). Finally, BS said that there was more about Slayer's powers in a deleted scene in TSR. This powers might have helped him to kill Asmo.
Reply to message
Fain's Myrddraal Etzel - 28/12/2009 01:45:58 PM 1879 Views
Nope, Myrddraal have been nothing but cannon fodder since book four *NM* Lordling - 28/12/2009 03:01:01 PM 459 Views
except, of course, for Shaidar Haran *NM* darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 03:12:17 PM 466 Views
But what was the purpose then? Etzel - 28/12/2009 03:43:01 PM 850 Views
To show the relationship between Fain and DO Bonden - 28/12/2009 03:52:59 PM 805 Views
Maybe... Etzel - 28/12/2009 04:02:42 PM 875 Views
Re: Maybe... Bonden - 29/12/2009 03:58:57 AM 1077 Views
Re: Fain's Myrddraal RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 03:19:37 PM 845 Views
Slayer also hunts Rand Etzel - 28/12/2009 03:57:11 PM 856 Views
I think it's possible that Slayer could have killed Asmo darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 04:35:57 PM 774 Views
The explanations Etzel - 28/12/2009 05:06:02 PM 1031 Views
Perhaps, I still don't buy it, but if that's the way it turns out I won't be shocked darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 05:20:06 PM 954 Views
Your reaction would be similar to BS's then Etzel - 28/12/2009 05:57:44 PM 1902 Views
I don't really have a strong opinion on which suspect did it darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 06:03:07 PM 773 Views
Well... Etzel - 28/12/2009 06:42:16 PM 824 Views
Indeed *NM* darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 06:55:52 PM 416 Views
Re: The explanations RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 08:01:19 PM 707 Views
The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... Etzel - 28/12/2009 08:13:07 PM 812 Views
Re: The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 10:19:24 PM 876 Views
The reason is... Etzel - 29/12/2009 11:58:24 AM 855 Views
The reasoning is very weak. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 03:34:19 PM 847 Views
If you mean... Etzel - 29/12/2009 04:01:25 PM 923 Views
A few points darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 04:14:12 PM 778 Views
You are wrong... Etzel - 29/12/2009 04:25:09 PM 761 Views
Thanks for the quote .. obviously hadn't heard that one before! darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 04:31:37 PM 870 Views
Key word - "possibly" RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 04:38:46 PM 778 Views
As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. Etzel - 29/12/2009 05:06:47 PM 750 Views
Re: As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:08:09 PM 676 Views
Well, it protects you of Shadowspawn, not that bad. Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:12:04 PM 757 Views
I don't think what happened to Fain or Slayer are "gifts" darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:26:15 PM 681 Views
Slayer calls it "gifts" in his PoV Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:37:49 PM 724 Views
I think you are stretching the reality a bit darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:42:10 PM 763 Views
You confuse it a bit... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:57:07 PM 825 Views
I think you've got it backwards darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 07:12:02 PM 725 Views
However... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:16:08 PM 766 Views
I wasn't arguing that point darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 08:13:25 PM 987 Views
Some things don't have to be spelled out, if they are that clear... *NM* Etzel - 29/12/2009 08:18:05 PM 719 Views
clearly they do since people are discussing it! darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 09:37:00 PM 704 Views
Yes; it is not readily apparant that the mark was made with the TP. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:12:07 PM 761 Views
Sorry, but that is utter nonsense Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:24:54 PM 855 Views
You are incorrect; I'm actually thinking that you only skimmed certain sections! RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:38:37 PM 812 Views
Simply read the books and what the authors said... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:55:42 PM 768 Views
Sorry, I think you have an opinion and read everything to support it in this case. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:02:42 PM 736 Views
Ok, then we play dumb, if you like... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:14:58 PM 848 Views
Because the Dark One is not merely a super channeler. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:21:21 PM 866 Views
Well, I disagree of course... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:36:19 PM 981 Views
You are mistaken on quite a few counts. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 04:37:51 PM 930 Views
Actually... Etzel - 29/12/2009 05:04:54 PM 827 Views
BWB says... darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 05:48:40 PM 1068 Views
Exactly. *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:12:30 PM 385 Views
Well... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:18:08 PM 876 Views
Just pointing out that your comment about Lanfear and Moggy not being assassins darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:37:21 PM 775 Views
No... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:47:07 PM 973 Views
Re: No... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:00:20 PM 943 Views
Again... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:10:12 PM 701 Views
So you dismiss the actual assassinations the Forsaken have performed on-screen? RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:26:55 PM 737 Views
Again... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:47:57 PM 675 Views
I think any Forsaken is capable of doing it. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 08:05:10 PM 772 Views
Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. Etzel - 29/12/2009 08:16:50 PM 649 Views
Re: Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 09:21:23 PM 743 Views
She kidnapped the Sharan's ... who's to say she hasn't killed others? *NM* darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 08:17:28 PM 395 Views
Yeah, after TFoH! We are looking for clues before LoC, guys! *sigh* Etzel - 29/12/2009 08:31:13 PM 622 Views
Where did I say this was a clue to her doing it? darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 09:58:29 PM 863 Views
I don't say... Etzel - 30/12/2009 12:08:27 PM 926 Views
Most of what you are talking about with Slayer is discoverd after LoC darius_sedai - 30/12/2009 02:36:18 PM 835 Views
Re: Well... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:41:29 PM 749 Views
It becomes clear... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:59:03 PM 682 Views
Basically, you think Slayer killed him. I do not. Nor do I care. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:04:20 PM 657 Views
Fair enough. *NM* Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:17:22 PM 445 Views
Re: Slayer also hunts Rand RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 04:39:36 PM 930 Views
As said... Etzel - 28/12/2009 04:54:07 PM 752 Views
Re: As said... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 07:49:22 PM 750 Views
It's rather the TP, which makes Slayer inhuman... Etzel - 28/12/2009 08:21:20 PM 721 Views
makes you wonder darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 09:45:08 PM 797 Views
Re: makes you wonder RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 10:16:57 PM 803 Views
I think... Etzel - 29/12/2009 12:03:41 PM 715 Views
Fain's Myrddraal killed asmo LOL *NM* aldapelan - 29/12/2009 05:26:22 AM 449 Views
It is quite obvious that it was Mistress Laras. *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 03:35:36 PM 412 Views
Intuitively, even. *NM* Gher - 29/12/2009 06:03:13 PM 409 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes