Active Users:620 Time:16/03/2026 01:39:43 PM
The explanations Etzel Send a noteboard - 28/12/2009 05:06:02 PM
Obviously Asmo was caught by surprise so just about anyone could have done the deed, but that doesn't explain:

1. Why Slayer overtly talked about killing 2 AS in the Stone and how much pleasure but didn't mention killing one of the Forsaken!


Slayer hates AS, and therefore likes to kill them most.

2. How Slayer found him in the first place. The killing seemed purely opportunistic, thus not particularly assassinish.


Slayer certainly learned from his patron that Asmo stayed with Rand. He probably spied on Asmo for a time (it's mentioned in the books that Slayer spies in TAR as well), till he finally got a good opportunity to kill Asmo, namely when he saw him strolling alone through the - at this time pretty deserted - Caemlyn Palace (a place Luc knows very well, of course).

3. How Asmodean recognized Slayer. Do you think he had a meet and greet with the Forsaken at some point... even if he did it's unlikely that Asmodean or any of the Forsaken would have been particularly impressed with what amounts to a tool in their eyes. Hell Asmo may have even reacted by trying to order him around just like all the others did with Shaidar Haran.


RJ told us that all Forsaken know Slayer and Slayer knows all Forsaken. This is supported by Slayer's PoV in WH and only logical, considering that Slayer is one of the Shadow's foremost assassins (and even mentioned in the Dark Prophecies). While Asmo was at first surprised, when Slayer appeared out of thin air, he figured out what this means a moment later, but then Slayer's bolt already took him.

All in all he doesn't jump out to me as an "obvious" choice as RJ seemed to think the killer should be to us.


I think a character called "Slayer", who is obviously - among other things - a traitor hunting assassin/bounty hunter of the Shadow and equipped with special powers by the DO seems like an obvious choice, especially since Slayer also killed or tried to kill other people in the books before, e.g. traitors of the Shadow.
Reply to message
Fain's Myrddraal - 28/12/2009 01:45:58 PM 2019 Views
Nope, Myrddraal have been nothing but cannon fodder since book four *NM* - 28/12/2009 03:01:01 PM 529 Views
except, of course, for Shaidar Haran *NM* - 28/12/2009 03:12:17 PM 515 Views
But what was the purpose then? - 28/12/2009 03:43:01 PM 971 Views
To show the relationship between Fain and DO - 28/12/2009 03:52:59 PM 934 Views
Maybe... - 28/12/2009 04:02:42 PM 982 Views
Re: Maybe... - 29/12/2009 03:58:57 AM 1206 Views
Re: Fain's Myrddraal - 28/12/2009 03:19:37 PM 963 Views
Slayer also hunts Rand - 28/12/2009 03:57:11 PM 1000 Views
I think it's possible that Slayer could have killed Asmo - 28/12/2009 04:35:57 PM 894 Views
The explanations - 28/12/2009 05:06:02 PM 1159 Views
Perhaps, I still don't buy it, but if that's the way it turns out I won't be shocked - 28/12/2009 05:20:06 PM 1099 Views
Your reaction would be similar to BS's then - 28/12/2009 05:57:44 PM 2013 Views
I don't really have a strong opinion on which suspect did it - 28/12/2009 06:03:07 PM 896 Views
Well... - 28/12/2009 06:42:16 PM 940 Views
Indeed *NM* - 28/12/2009 06:55:52 PM 464 Views
Re: The explanations - 28/12/2009 08:01:19 PM 835 Views
The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... - 28/12/2009 08:13:07 PM 937 Views
Re: The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... - 28/12/2009 10:19:24 PM 1015 Views
The reason is... - 29/12/2009 11:58:24 AM 959 Views
The reasoning is very weak. - 29/12/2009 03:34:19 PM 978 Views
If you mean... - 29/12/2009 04:01:25 PM 1064 Views
A few points - 29/12/2009 04:14:12 PM 896 Views
You are wrong... - 29/12/2009 04:25:09 PM 888 Views
Thanks for the quote .. obviously hadn't heard that one before! - 29/12/2009 04:31:37 PM 986 Views
Key word - "possibly" - 29/12/2009 04:38:46 PM 896 Views
As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. - 29/12/2009 05:06:47 PM 861 Views
Re: As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. - 29/12/2009 06:08:09 PM 792 Views
Well, it protects you of Shadowspawn, not that bad. - 29/12/2009 06:12:04 PM 883 Views
I don't think what happened to Fain or Slayer are "gifts" - 29/12/2009 06:26:15 PM 796 Views
Slayer calls it "gifts" in his PoV - 29/12/2009 06:37:49 PM 835 Views
I think you are stretching the reality a bit - 29/12/2009 06:42:10 PM 880 Views
You confuse it a bit... - 29/12/2009 06:57:07 PM 942 Views
I think you've got it backwards - 29/12/2009 07:12:02 PM 851 Views
However... - 29/12/2009 07:16:08 PM 882 Views
I wasn't arguing that point - 29/12/2009 08:13:25 PM 1106 Views
Some things don't have to be spelled out, if they are that clear... *NM* - 29/12/2009 08:18:05 PM 850 Views
clearly they do since people are discussing it! - 29/12/2009 09:37:00 PM 818 Views
Yes; it is not readily apparant that the mark was made with the TP. - 29/12/2009 06:12:07 PM 908 Views
Sorry, but that is utter nonsense - 29/12/2009 06:24:54 PM 997 Views
You are incorrect; I'm actually thinking that you only skimmed certain sections! - 29/12/2009 06:38:37 PM 951 Views
Simply read the books and what the authors said... - 29/12/2009 06:55:42 PM 890 Views
Sorry, I think you have an opinion and read everything to support it in this case. - 29/12/2009 07:02:42 PM 858 Views
Ok, then we play dumb, if you like... - 29/12/2009 07:14:58 PM 974 Views
Because the Dark One is not merely a super channeler. - 29/12/2009 07:21:21 PM 999 Views
Well, I disagree of course... - 29/12/2009 07:36:19 PM 1128 Views
You are mistaken on quite a few counts. - 29/12/2009 04:37:51 PM 1027 Views
Actually... - 29/12/2009 05:04:54 PM 945 Views
BWB says... - 29/12/2009 05:48:40 PM 1192 Views
Exactly. *NM* - 29/12/2009 06:12:30 PM 446 Views
Well... - 29/12/2009 06:18:08 PM 1011 Views
Just pointing out that your comment about Lanfear and Moggy not being assassins - 29/12/2009 06:37:21 PM 904 Views
No... - 29/12/2009 06:47:07 PM 1118 Views
Re: No... - 29/12/2009 07:00:20 PM 1072 Views
Again... - 29/12/2009 07:10:12 PM 836 Views
So you dismiss the actual assassinations the Forsaken have performed on-screen? - 29/12/2009 07:26:55 PM 868 Views
Again... - 29/12/2009 07:47:57 PM 795 Views
I think any Forsaken is capable of doing it. - 29/12/2009 08:05:10 PM 892 Views
Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. - 29/12/2009 08:16:50 PM 756 Views
Re: Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. - 29/12/2009 09:21:23 PM 852 Views
She kidnapped the Sharan's ... who's to say she hasn't killed others? *NM* - 29/12/2009 08:17:28 PM 449 Views
Yeah, after TFoH! We are looking for clues before LoC, guys! *sigh* - 29/12/2009 08:31:13 PM 744 Views
Where did I say this was a clue to her doing it? - 29/12/2009 09:58:29 PM 974 Views
I don't say... - 30/12/2009 12:08:27 PM 1079 Views
Most of what you are talking about with Slayer is discoverd after LoC - 30/12/2009 02:36:18 PM 964 Views
Re: Well... - 29/12/2009 06:41:29 PM 879 Views
It becomes clear... - 29/12/2009 06:59:03 PM 798 Views
Basically, you think Slayer killed him. I do not. Nor do I care. - 29/12/2009 07:04:20 PM 763 Views
Fair enough. *NM* - 29/12/2009 07:17:22 PM 493 Views
Re: Slayer also hunts Rand - 28/12/2009 04:39:36 PM 1074 Views
As said... - 28/12/2009 04:54:07 PM 865 Views
Re: As said... - 28/12/2009 07:49:22 PM 856 Views
It's rather the TP, which makes Slayer inhuman... - 28/12/2009 08:21:20 PM 847 Views
makes you wonder - 28/12/2009 09:45:08 PM 934 Views
Re: makes you wonder - 28/12/2009 10:16:57 PM 932 Views
I think... - 29/12/2009 12:03:41 PM 840 Views
Fain's Myrddraal killed asmo LOL *NM* - 29/12/2009 05:26:22 AM 508 Views
It is quite obvious that it was Mistress Laras. *NM* - 29/12/2009 03:35:36 PM 469 Views
Intuitively, even. *NM* - 29/12/2009 06:03:13 PM 454 Views

Reply to Message