I still don't see the logic of saying that someone couldn't have murdered another person many months ago just because that person may have been recently killed. Being killed doesn't negate actions you took in the past, and even the most powerful stream of balefire wouldn't undo her actions from months ago.
That RJ said that he will most likely reveal who killed Asmo in the killer's PoV. Since Graendal will most likely not have any other PoV, it makes it less likely that she is the killer (it's also not really understandable, why it wasn't already revealed in her previous PoV then, since she is among the Forsaken with the most PoV).
But even without this the Graendal theory was basically simply based on the fact that we see her as one of the Forsaken in TFoH before Asmo's death, who wanted to lure Rand to Sammael in Illian (at least, if you take the clues from before LoC, as RJ said we should).
I just don't see anything beyond "Slayer slays things so he probably killed Asmodean! Oh, and he has powers!" to this theory. Sorry!
Slayer is a Top Assassin of the Shadow with special "channeler-like" TP abilities by the DO, who already hunted/killed other important traitors or enemies of the Shadow before LoC. Slayer is apparently pretty significant, because this plotline about Luc, Isam & Slayer was already introduced in EotW and will likely accompany us till AMoL, as BS indicated.
This message last edited by Etzel on 29/12/2009 at 12:05:55 PM
Fain's Myrddraal
28/12/2009 01:45:58 PM
- 1862 Views
Nope, Myrddraal have been nothing but cannon fodder since book four *NM*
28/12/2009 03:01:01 PM
- 450 Views
But what was the purpose then?
28/12/2009 03:43:01 PM
- 835 Views
Re: Fain's Myrddraal
28/12/2009 03:19:37 PM
- 834 Views
Slayer also hunts Rand
28/12/2009 03:57:11 PM
- 841 Views
I think it's possible that Slayer could have killed Asmo
28/12/2009 04:35:57 PM
- 757 Views
The explanations
28/12/2009 05:06:02 PM
- 1017 Views
Perhaps, I still don't buy it, but if that's the way it turns out I won't be shocked
28/12/2009 05:20:06 PM
- 941 Views
Your reaction would be similar to BS's then
28/12/2009 05:57:44 PM
- 1889 Views
Re: The explanations
28/12/2009 08:01:19 PM
- 693 Views
The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS...
28/12/2009 08:13:07 PM
- 796 Views
Re: The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS...
28/12/2009 10:19:24 PM
- 861 Views
The reason is...
29/12/2009 11:58:24 AM
- 839 Views
The reasoning is very weak.
29/12/2009 03:34:19 PM
- 834 Views
If you mean...
29/12/2009 04:01:25 PM
- 909 Views
A few points
29/12/2009 04:14:12 PM
- 765 Views
You are wrong...
29/12/2009 04:25:09 PM
- 747 Views
Key word - "possibly"
29/12/2009 04:38:46 PM
- 767 Views
As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear.
29/12/2009 05:06:47 PM
- 734 Views
Re: As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear.
29/12/2009 06:08:09 PM
- 661 Views
Well, it protects you of Shadowspawn, not that bad.
29/12/2009 06:12:04 PM
- 741 Views
I don't think what happened to Fain or Slayer are "gifts"
29/12/2009 06:26:15 PM
- 666 Views
Slayer calls it "gifts" in his PoV
29/12/2009 06:37:49 PM
- 709 Views
I think you are stretching the reality a bit
29/12/2009 06:42:10 PM
- 749 Views
You confuse it a bit...
29/12/2009 06:57:07 PM
- 812 Views
I think you've got it backwards
29/12/2009 07:12:02 PM
- 710 Views
However...
29/12/2009 07:16:08 PM
- 751 Views
I wasn't arguing that point
29/12/2009 08:13:25 PM
- 972 Views

Some things don't have to be spelled out, if they are that clear...
*NM*
29/12/2009 08:18:05 PM
- 707 Views

Yes; it is not readily apparant that the mark was made with the TP.
29/12/2009 06:12:07 PM
- 750 Views
Sorry, but that is utter nonsense
29/12/2009 06:24:54 PM
- 841 Views
You are incorrect; I'm actually thinking that you only skimmed certain sections!
29/12/2009 06:38:37 PM
- 799 Views
Simply read the books and what the authors said...
29/12/2009 06:55:42 PM
- 753 Views
Sorry, I think you have an opinion and read everything to support it in this case.
29/12/2009 07:02:42 PM
- 723 Views
Ok, then we play dumb, if you like...
29/12/2009 07:14:58 PM
- 832 Views
You are mistaken on quite a few counts.
29/12/2009 04:37:51 PM
- 912 Views
Actually...
29/12/2009 05:04:54 PM
- 815 Views
BWB says...
29/12/2009 05:48:40 PM
- 1057 Views
Well...
29/12/2009 06:18:08 PM
- 862 Views
Just pointing out that your comment about Lanfear and Moggy not being assassins
29/12/2009 06:37:21 PM
- 761 Views
No...
29/12/2009 06:47:07 PM
- 956 Views
Re: No...
29/12/2009 07:00:20 PM
- 927 Views
Again...
29/12/2009 07:10:12 PM
- 688 Views
So you dismiss the actual assassinations the Forsaken have performed on-screen?
29/12/2009 07:26:55 PM
- 722 Views
Again...
29/12/2009 07:47:57 PM
- 658 Views
I think any Forsaken is capable of doing it.
29/12/2009 08:05:10 PM
- 757 Views
She kidnapped the Sharan's ... who's to say she hasn't killed others? *NM*
29/12/2009 08:17:28 PM
- 386 Views
Yeah, after TFoH! We are looking for clues before LoC, guys! *sigh*
29/12/2009 08:31:13 PM
- 609 Views
Where did I say this was a clue to her doing it?
29/12/2009 09:58:29 PM
- 848 Views
I don't say...
30/12/2009 12:08:27 PM
- 911 Views
Most of what you are talking about with Slayer is discoverd after LoC
30/12/2009 02:36:18 PM
- 818 Views
Re: Well...
29/12/2009 06:41:29 PM
- 734 Views
It becomes clear...
29/12/2009 06:59:03 PM
- 666 Views
Re: Slayer also hunts Rand
28/12/2009 04:39:36 PM
- 910 Views
As said...
28/12/2009 04:54:07 PM
- 737 Views
Re: As said...
28/12/2009 07:49:22 PM
- 736 Views
It's rather the TP, which makes Slayer inhuman...
28/12/2009 08:21:20 PM
- 707 Views
Fain's Myrddraal killed asmo LOL *NM*
29/12/2009 05:26:22 AM
- 442 Views