Active Users:1025 Time:02/08/2026 11:04:38 AM
If you mean... Etzel Send a noteboard - 29/12/2009 04:01:25 PM
I would say Graendal's POVs might already contain confirmation of this - but others have already pointed this out in detail, so I'll just refer you to Theoryland.


By this apparent "confirmation" in Graendal's PoV that she seems sure that Asmo is dead, then you fall for a common misunderstanding. This doesn't mean at all that Graendal is the killer. For example, she might simply learned about Asmo's death from the DO like Demandred did (or maybe she even learned it from Demandred), or she could simply be the Forsaken, who sent Slayer. Besides that, your confirmation comes in the books after Asmo's death, while RJ said that the main clues to figure it out are included in the books before Asmo's death.

Masema has had more of a role in the series than Slayer has, and his storyline ended in a rather one-note fashion. So I'm still not convinced. In fact, given that Slayer has more to do with Perrin's story than Rand's, leads me to believe that this is an enemy that Perrin will need to confront, and Slayer may have nothing to do with the Forsaken or the other characters.


Well, I definitely would disagree that Masema was a more important character than Slayer is. However, the fact that Slayer will likely eventually be killed in the next books, doesn't rule him out as being Asmo's killer (by the way, wasn't this your argument regarding Graendal?), at least if he has a PoV before his death, where the deed is revealed.

Furthermore, we already saw Slayer dealing with Forsaken and trying to kill Rand, Nynaeve, Fain and others. Therefore you argument about Perrin doesn't make much sense, especially since this future role also wouldn't rule out that Slayer killed Asmo before.

And you're description of him dovetails exactly into why I find him and the theories about him so unconvincing: they all revolve around "His name is Slayer, which means he's deadly! And he has powers in T'A'R!"

By the way, we have absolutely no evidence that his powers are derived from the True Power. Firstly, it is possible for non-channelers to be Dreamers. Secondly, the Dark One can transmigrate souls, merge bodies/souls and affect the Pattern - all without using the True Power. We have no reason to believe the True Power is anything but a parallel force of the One Power that only channelers can access. Lastly, his powers in TAR seem to be less than that of a master Dreamer or Wise One - it looks like the only thing he does is enter it in the flesh. It is unknown if he can pull others into the dreamworld or etc.


We know from RJ, BS and Slayer's PoV that Slayer got several gifts from the DO. How else should the DO grant these gifts, if not by the TP? Also Shadowspawn like Myrddraal or former humans like the Gray Men have "channeler-like" powers (e.g. a kind of Traveling or the ability to be invisible), which ultimately must stem from the DO, and thus the TP. It's ridiculous to believe that the DO gave Slayer unimportant gifts, since he obviously wanted to create a top assassin.
This message last edited by Etzel on 29/12/2009 at 04:03:20 PM
Reply to message
Fain's Myrddraal - 28/12/2009 01:45:58 PM 2094 Views
Nope, Myrddraal have been nothing but cannon fodder since book four *NM* - 28/12/2009 03:01:01 PM 574 Views
except, of course, for Shaidar Haran *NM* - 28/12/2009 03:12:17 PM 554 Views
But what was the purpose then? - 28/12/2009 03:43:01 PM 1069 Views
To show the relationship between Fain and DO - 28/12/2009 03:52:59 PM 1036 Views
Maybe... - 28/12/2009 04:02:42 PM 1076 Views
Re: Maybe... - 29/12/2009 03:58:57 AM 1289 Views
Re: Fain's Myrddraal - 28/12/2009 03:19:37 PM 1051 Views
Slayer also hunts Rand - 28/12/2009 03:57:11 PM 1105 Views
I think it's possible that Slayer could have killed Asmo - 28/12/2009 04:35:57 PM 988 Views
The explanations - 28/12/2009 05:06:02 PM 1260 Views
Perhaps, I still don't buy it, but if that's the way it turns out I won't be shocked - 28/12/2009 05:20:06 PM 1195 Views
Your reaction would be similar to BS's then - 28/12/2009 05:57:44 PM 2123 Views
I don't really have a strong opinion on which suspect did it - 28/12/2009 06:03:07 PM 983 Views
Well... - 28/12/2009 06:42:16 PM 1031 Views
Indeed *NM* - 28/12/2009 06:55:52 PM 509 Views
Re: The explanations - 28/12/2009 08:01:19 PM 940 Views
The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... - 28/12/2009 08:13:07 PM 1027 Views
Re: The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... - 28/12/2009 10:19:24 PM 1096 Views
The reason is... - 29/12/2009 11:58:24 AM 1055 Views
The reasoning is very weak. - 29/12/2009 03:34:19 PM 1072 Views
If you mean... - 29/12/2009 04:01:25 PM 1155 Views
A few points - 29/12/2009 04:14:12 PM 980 Views
You are wrong... - 29/12/2009 04:25:09 PM 975 Views
Thanks for the quote .. obviously hadn't heard that one before! - 29/12/2009 04:31:37 PM 1076 Views
Key word - "possibly" - 29/12/2009 04:38:46 PM 990 Views
As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. - 29/12/2009 05:06:47 PM 943 Views
Re: As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. - 29/12/2009 06:08:09 PM 878 Views
Well, it protects you of Shadowspawn, not that bad. - 29/12/2009 06:12:04 PM 969 Views
I don't think what happened to Fain or Slayer are "gifts" - 29/12/2009 06:26:15 PM 876 Views
Slayer calls it "gifts" in his PoV - 29/12/2009 06:37:49 PM 917 Views
I think you are stretching the reality a bit - 29/12/2009 06:42:10 PM 970 Views
You confuse it a bit... - 29/12/2009 06:57:07 PM 1031 Views
I think you've got it backwards - 29/12/2009 07:12:02 PM 928 Views
However... - 29/12/2009 07:16:08 PM 964 Views
I wasn't arguing that point - 29/12/2009 08:13:25 PM 1198 Views
Some things don't have to be spelled out, if they are that clear... *NM* - 29/12/2009 08:18:05 PM 924 Views
clearly they do since people are discussing it! - 29/12/2009 09:37:00 PM 894 Views
Yes; it is not readily apparant that the mark was made with the TP. - 29/12/2009 06:12:07 PM 994 Views
Sorry, but that is utter nonsense - 29/12/2009 06:24:54 PM 1084 Views
You are incorrect; I'm actually thinking that you only skimmed certain sections! - 29/12/2009 06:38:37 PM 1042 Views
Simply read the books and what the authors said... - 29/12/2009 06:55:42 PM 977 Views
Sorry, I think you have an opinion and read everything to support it in this case. - 29/12/2009 07:02:42 PM 947 Views
Ok, then we play dumb, if you like... - 29/12/2009 07:14:58 PM 1060 Views
Because the Dark One is not merely a super channeler. - 29/12/2009 07:21:21 PM 1078 Views
Well, I disagree of course... - 29/12/2009 07:36:19 PM 1226 Views
You are mistaken on quite a few counts. - 29/12/2009 04:37:51 PM 1150 Views
Actually... - 29/12/2009 05:04:54 PM 1051 Views
BWB says... - 29/12/2009 05:48:40 PM 1264 Views
Exactly. *NM* - 29/12/2009 06:12:30 PM 496 Views
Well... - 29/12/2009 06:18:08 PM 1095 Views
Just pointing out that your comment about Lanfear and Moggy not being assassins - 29/12/2009 06:37:21 PM 1000 Views
No... - 29/12/2009 06:47:07 PM 1209 Views
Re: No... - 29/12/2009 07:00:20 PM 1164 Views
Again... - 29/12/2009 07:10:12 PM 915 Views
So you dismiss the actual assassinations the Forsaken have performed on-screen? - 29/12/2009 07:26:55 PM 988 Views
Again... - 29/12/2009 07:47:57 PM 880 Views
I think any Forsaken is capable of doing it. - 29/12/2009 08:05:10 PM 982 Views
Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. - 29/12/2009 08:16:50 PM 844 Views
Re: Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. - 29/12/2009 09:21:23 PM 944 Views
She kidnapped the Sharan's ... who's to say she hasn't killed others? *NM* - 29/12/2009 08:17:28 PM 487 Views
Yeah, after TFoH! We are looking for clues before LoC, guys! *sigh* - 29/12/2009 08:31:13 PM 816 Views
Where did I say this was a clue to her doing it? - 29/12/2009 09:58:29 PM 1057 Views
I don't say... - 30/12/2009 12:08:27 PM 1169 Views
Most of what you are talking about with Slayer is discoverd after LoC - 30/12/2009 02:36:18 PM 1056 Views
Re: Well... - 29/12/2009 06:41:29 PM 979 Views
It becomes clear... - 29/12/2009 06:59:03 PM 884 Views
Basically, you think Slayer killed him. I do not. Nor do I care. - 29/12/2009 07:04:20 PM 854 Views
Fair enough. *NM* - 29/12/2009 07:17:22 PM 537 Views
Re: Slayer also hunts Rand - 28/12/2009 04:39:36 PM 1172 Views
As said... - 28/12/2009 04:54:07 PM 961 Views
Re: As said... - 28/12/2009 07:49:22 PM 949 Views
It's rather the TP, which makes Slayer inhuman... - 28/12/2009 08:21:20 PM 951 Views
makes you wonder - 28/12/2009 09:45:08 PM 1027 Views
Re: makes you wonder - 28/12/2009 10:16:57 PM 1026 Views
I think... - 29/12/2009 12:03:41 PM 916 Views
Fain's Myrddraal killed asmo LOL *NM* - 29/12/2009 05:26:22 AM 547 Views
It is quite obvious that it was Mistress Laras. *NM* - 29/12/2009 03:35:36 PM 516 Views
Intuitively, even. *NM* - 29/12/2009 06:03:13 PM 490 Views

Reply to Message