You are mistaken on quite a few counts.
RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 29/12/2009 04:37:51 PM
I never said that any of the theories indicated Graendal was the killer, but they could. My point was that they are more convincing than the one you have presented.
By the way, the powers the Shadowspawn have may be unrelated to the True Power or the One Power - Aginor did something in their creation that gave them these abilities; we don't know what or even if they are a result of a combination of those forces or an effect of those forces on certain genetic structures. Just as the Dark One does not seem to have used the True Power to do any of His more powerful version of reality twisting. We basically don't know how they have these abilities. Just because an ability is connected to the OP, TP or the Dark One doesn't mean it is derived from them. A good example is Dreaming, which does not require channeling, or the taint at Shadar Logoth, which is an ancient force of it's own.
And, IMHO, the Dark One already has far more powerful and silent assassins in Moghedien and Lanfear. It's part of their modus operandi to kill targets using T'A'R and the One Power. More useful than some guy with personality issues and a knife.
You might need to re-read the Battle of Two Rivers. Unlike Rand and Mat, Perrin has dealt with Slayer directly, and Slayer was directly assaulting the wolves. There is more tying him to Slayer than the other characters.
I just think it is one thing to put forth a theory that may or may not be correct and quite another to say that the theory is obvious. The Slayer theory is unconvincing and it doesn't seem obvious to me. And if the Dark One needed an ultra assassin, and took time to create one, I would say It had too much time on It's hands which is why it's top agents are getting killed left and right.
By the way, the powers the Shadowspawn have may be unrelated to the True Power or the One Power - Aginor did something in their creation that gave them these abilities; we don't know what or even if they are a result of a combination of those forces or an effect of those forces on certain genetic structures. Just as the Dark One does not seem to have used the True Power to do any of His more powerful version of reality twisting. We basically don't know how they have these abilities. Just because an ability is connected to the OP, TP or the Dark One doesn't mean it is derived from them. A good example is Dreaming, which does not require channeling, or the taint at Shadar Logoth, which is an ancient force of it's own.
And, IMHO, the Dark One already has far more powerful and silent assassins in Moghedien and Lanfear. It's part of their modus operandi to kill targets using T'A'R and the One Power. More useful than some guy with personality issues and a knife.
You might need to re-read the Battle of Two Rivers. Unlike Rand and Mat, Perrin has dealt with Slayer directly, and Slayer was directly assaulting the wolves. There is more tying him to Slayer than the other characters.
I just think it is one thing to put forth a theory that may or may not be correct and quite another to say that the theory is obvious. The Slayer theory is unconvincing and it doesn't seem obvious to me. And if the Dark One needed an ultra assassin, and took time to create one, I would say It had too much time on It's hands which is why it's top agents are getting killed left and right.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 29/12/2009 at 04:45:07 PM
Fain's Myrddraal
- 28/12/2009 01:45:58 PM
2092 Views
Nope, Myrddraal have been nothing but cannon fodder since book four *NM*
- 28/12/2009 03:01:01 PM
574 Views
But what was the purpose then?
- 28/12/2009 03:43:01 PM
1068 Views
Re: Fain's Myrddraal
- 28/12/2009 03:19:37 PM
1049 Views
Slayer also hunts Rand
- 28/12/2009 03:57:11 PM
1103 Views
I think it's possible that Slayer could have killed Asmo
- 28/12/2009 04:35:57 PM
987 Views
The explanations
- 28/12/2009 05:06:02 PM
1259 Views
Perhaps, I still don't buy it, but if that's the way it turns out I won't be shocked
- 28/12/2009 05:20:06 PM
1194 Views
Your reaction would be similar to BS's then
- 28/12/2009 05:57:44 PM
2121 Views
Re: The explanations
- 28/12/2009 08:01:19 PM
938 Views
The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS...
- 28/12/2009 08:13:07 PM
1026 Views
Re: The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS...
- 28/12/2009 10:19:24 PM
1095 Views
The reason is...
- 29/12/2009 11:58:24 AM
1054 Views
The reasoning is very weak.
- 29/12/2009 03:34:19 PM
1072 Views
If you mean...
- 29/12/2009 04:01:25 PM
1153 Views
A few points
- 29/12/2009 04:14:12 PM
980 Views
You are wrong...
- 29/12/2009 04:25:09 PM
975 Views
Key word - "possibly"
- 29/12/2009 04:38:46 PM
990 Views
As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear.
- 29/12/2009 05:06:47 PM
941 Views
Re: As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear.
- 29/12/2009 06:08:09 PM
877 Views
Well, it protects you of Shadowspawn, not that bad.
- 29/12/2009 06:12:04 PM
969 Views
I don't think what happened to Fain or Slayer are "gifts"
- 29/12/2009 06:26:15 PM
876 Views
Slayer calls it "gifts" in his PoV
- 29/12/2009 06:37:49 PM
917 Views
I think you are stretching the reality a bit
- 29/12/2009 06:42:10 PM
969 Views
You confuse it a bit...
- 29/12/2009 06:57:07 PM
1030 Views
I think you've got it backwards
- 29/12/2009 07:12:02 PM
928 Views
However...
- 29/12/2009 07:16:08 PM
964 Views
I wasn't arguing that point
- 29/12/2009 08:13:25 PM
1196 Views
- 29/12/2009 08:13:25 PM
1196 Views
Some things don't have to be spelled out, if they are that clear...
*NM*
- 29/12/2009 08:18:05 PM
924 Views
*NM*
- 29/12/2009 08:18:05 PM
924 Views
Yes; it is not readily apparant that the mark was made with the TP.
- 29/12/2009 06:12:07 PM
993 Views
Sorry, but that is utter nonsense
- 29/12/2009 06:24:54 PM
1084 Views
You are incorrect; I'm actually thinking that you only skimmed certain sections!
- 29/12/2009 06:38:37 PM
1041 Views
Simply read the books and what the authors said...
- 29/12/2009 06:55:42 PM
976 Views
Sorry, I think you have an opinion and read everything to support it in this case.
- 29/12/2009 07:02:42 PM
947 Views
Ok, then we play dumb, if you like...
- 29/12/2009 07:14:58 PM
1058 Views
You are mistaken on quite a few counts.
- 29/12/2009 04:37:51 PM
1150 Views
Actually...
- 29/12/2009 05:04:54 PM
1049 Views
BWB says...
- 29/12/2009 05:48:40 PM
1263 Views
Well...
- 29/12/2009 06:18:08 PM
1093 Views
Just pointing out that your comment about Lanfear and Moggy not being assassins
- 29/12/2009 06:37:21 PM
1000 Views
No...
- 29/12/2009 06:47:07 PM
1208 Views
Re: No...
- 29/12/2009 07:00:20 PM
1164 Views
Again...
- 29/12/2009 07:10:12 PM
915 Views
So you dismiss the actual assassinations the Forsaken have performed on-screen?
- 29/12/2009 07:26:55 PM
988 Views
Again...
- 29/12/2009 07:47:57 PM
879 Views
I think any Forsaken is capable of doing it.
- 29/12/2009 08:05:10 PM
981 Views
She kidnapped the Sharan's ... who's to say she hasn't killed others? *NM*
- 29/12/2009 08:17:28 PM
487 Views
Yeah, after TFoH! We are looking for clues before LoC, guys! *sigh*
- 29/12/2009 08:31:13 PM
814 Views
Where did I say this was a clue to her doing it?
- 29/12/2009 09:58:29 PM
1057 Views
I don't say...
- 30/12/2009 12:08:27 PM
1168 Views
Most of what you are talking about with Slayer is discoverd after LoC
- 30/12/2009 02:36:18 PM
1056 Views
Re: Well...
- 29/12/2009 06:41:29 PM
979 Views
It becomes clear...
- 29/12/2009 06:59:03 PM
883 Views
Re: Slayer also hunts Rand
- 28/12/2009 04:39:36 PM
1170 Views
As said...
- 28/12/2009 04:54:07 PM
960 Views
Re: As said...
- 28/12/2009 07:49:22 PM
948 Views
It's rather the TP, which makes Slayer inhuman...
- 28/12/2009 08:21:20 PM
951 Views
Fain's Myrddraal killed asmo LOL *NM*
- 29/12/2009 05:26:22 AM
547 Views
