Active Users:762 Time:05/08/2025 10:29:39 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Yes; it is not readily apparant that the mark was made with the TP. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 29/12/2009 06:12:07 PM
You certainly have the freedom to make a supposition that it was, but we have no evidence at all that the mark was made with either Power.

It can simply be a case of Shaidar Haran being able to manipulate time/space in a way further developed than most Myrdraal.

After all, only channelers can access the True Power, and we've seen no evidence that the Dark One can make it available to Shadowspawn. The best evidence we have is that Shaidar Haran has physical limitations regarding what it can touch and how - Elza was doing most of the actual moving in TGS. If SH had access to the TP, it could have 1) removed the Compulsion in Elza's mind itself or 2) moved objects/people physically with the TP.

Whatever SH can do, it does not seem to be related to the One Power or the True Power in a readily apparent way.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Fain's Myrddraal Etzel - 28/12/2009 01:45:58 PM 1879 Views
Nope, Myrddraal have been nothing but cannon fodder since book four *NM* Lordling - 28/12/2009 03:01:01 PM 459 Views
except, of course, for Shaidar Haran *NM* darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 03:12:17 PM 466 Views
But what was the purpose then? Etzel - 28/12/2009 03:43:01 PM 850 Views
To show the relationship between Fain and DO Bonden - 28/12/2009 03:52:59 PM 805 Views
Maybe... Etzel - 28/12/2009 04:02:42 PM 875 Views
Re: Maybe... Bonden - 29/12/2009 03:58:57 AM 1077 Views
Re: Fain's Myrddraal RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 03:19:37 PM 846 Views
Slayer also hunts Rand Etzel - 28/12/2009 03:57:11 PM 856 Views
I think it's possible that Slayer could have killed Asmo darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 04:35:57 PM 775 Views
The explanations Etzel - 28/12/2009 05:06:02 PM 1031 Views
Perhaps, I still don't buy it, but if that's the way it turns out I won't be shocked darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 05:20:06 PM 955 Views
Your reaction would be similar to BS's then Etzel - 28/12/2009 05:57:44 PM 1903 Views
I don't really have a strong opinion on which suspect did it darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 06:03:07 PM 773 Views
Well... Etzel - 28/12/2009 06:42:16 PM 825 Views
Indeed *NM* darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 06:55:52 PM 416 Views
Re: The explanations RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 08:01:19 PM 708 Views
The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... Etzel - 28/12/2009 08:13:07 PM 813 Views
Re: The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 10:19:24 PM 877 Views
The reason is... Etzel - 29/12/2009 11:58:24 AM 856 Views
The reasoning is very weak. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 03:34:19 PM 848 Views
If you mean... Etzel - 29/12/2009 04:01:25 PM 924 Views
A few points darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 04:14:12 PM 778 Views
You are wrong... Etzel - 29/12/2009 04:25:09 PM 762 Views
Thanks for the quote .. obviously hadn't heard that one before! darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 04:31:37 PM 870 Views
Key word - "possibly" RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 04:38:46 PM 779 Views
As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. Etzel - 29/12/2009 05:06:47 PM 750 Views
Re: As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:08:09 PM 676 Views
Well, it protects you of Shadowspawn, not that bad. Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:12:04 PM 758 Views
I don't think what happened to Fain or Slayer are "gifts" darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:26:15 PM 681 Views
Slayer calls it "gifts" in his PoV Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:37:49 PM 725 Views
I think you are stretching the reality a bit darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:42:10 PM 764 Views
You confuse it a bit... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:57:07 PM 826 Views
I think you've got it backwards darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 07:12:02 PM 725 Views
However... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:16:08 PM 767 Views
I wasn't arguing that point darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 08:13:25 PM 988 Views
Some things don't have to be spelled out, if they are that clear... *NM* Etzel - 29/12/2009 08:18:05 PM 720 Views
clearly they do since people are discussing it! darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 09:37:00 PM 705 Views
Yes; it is not readily apparant that the mark was made with the TP. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:12:07 PM 762 Views
Sorry, but that is utter nonsense Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:24:54 PM 856 Views
You are incorrect; I'm actually thinking that you only skimmed certain sections! RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:38:37 PM 813 Views
Simply read the books and what the authors said... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:55:42 PM 768 Views
Sorry, I think you have an opinion and read everything to support it in this case. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:02:42 PM 737 Views
Ok, then we play dumb, if you like... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:14:58 PM 849 Views
Because the Dark One is not merely a super channeler. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:21:21 PM 866 Views
Well, I disagree of course... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:36:19 PM 982 Views
You are mistaken on quite a few counts. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 04:37:51 PM 931 Views
Actually... Etzel - 29/12/2009 05:04:54 PM 828 Views
BWB says... darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 05:48:40 PM 1069 Views
Exactly. *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:12:30 PM 385 Views
Well... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:18:08 PM 877 Views
Just pointing out that your comment about Lanfear and Moggy not being assassins darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:37:21 PM 776 Views
No... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:47:07 PM 973 Views
Re: No... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:00:20 PM 944 Views
Again... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:10:12 PM 701 Views
So you dismiss the actual assassinations the Forsaken have performed on-screen? RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:26:55 PM 738 Views
Again... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:47:57 PM 675 Views
I think any Forsaken is capable of doing it. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 08:05:10 PM 772 Views
Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. Etzel - 29/12/2009 08:16:50 PM 649 Views
Re: Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 09:21:23 PM 744 Views
She kidnapped the Sharan's ... who's to say she hasn't killed others? *NM* darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 08:17:28 PM 395 Views
Yeah, after TFoH! We are looking for clues before LoC, guys! *sigh* Etzel - 29/12/2009 08:31:13 PM 623 Views
Where did I say this was a clue to her doing it? darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 09:58:29 PM 864 Views
I don't say... Etzel - 30/12/2009 12:08:27 PM 926 Views
Most of what you are talking about with Slayer is discoverd after LoC darius_sedai - 30/12/2009 02:36:18 PM 836 Views
Re: Well... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:41:29 PM 750 Views
It becomes clear... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:59:03 PM 682 Views
Basically, you think Slayer killed him. I do not. Nor do I care. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:04:20 PM 658 Views
Fair enough. *NM* Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:17:22 PM 445 Views
Re: Slayer also hunts Rand RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 04:39:36 PM 931 Views
As said... Etzel - 28/12/2009 04:54:07 PM 753 Views
Re: As said... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 07:49:22 PM 751 Views
It's rather the TP, which makes Slayer inhuman... Etzel - 28/12/2009 08:21:20 PM 721 Views
makes you wonder darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 09:45:08 PM 799 Views
Re: makes you wonder RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 10:16:57 PM 804 Views
I think... Etzel - 29/12/2009 12:03:41 PM 715 Views
Fain's Myrddraal killed asmo LOL *NM* aldapelan - 29/12/2009 05:26:22 AM 449 Views
It is quite obvious that it was Mistress Laras. *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 03:35:36 PM 412 Views
Intuitively, even. *NM* Gher - 29/12/2009 06:03:13 PM 409 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes