Active Users:1507 Time:25/12/2025 10:17:29 AM
It becomes clear... Etzel Send a noteboard - 29/12/2009 06:59:03 PM
If you combine the clues already from before LoC. But I think one can understand then, why RJ thought it obvious that the top assassin Slayer killed Asmo.
Reply to message
Fain's Myrddraal - 28/12/2009 01:45:58 PM 1988 Views
Nope, Myrddraal have been nothing but cannon fodder since book four *NM* - 28/12/2009 03:01:01 PM 517 Views
except, of course, for Shaidar Haran *NM* - 28/12/2009 03:12:17 PM 501 Views
But what was the purpose then? - 28/12/2009 03:43:01 PM 938 Views
To show the relationship between Fain and DO - 28/12/2009 03:52:59 PM 881 Views
Maybe... - 28/12/2009 04:02:42 PM 960 Views
Re: Maybe... - 29/12/2009 03:58:57 AM 1173 Views
Re: Fain's Myrddraal - 28/12/2009 03:19:37 PM 929 Views
Slayer also hunts Rand - 28/12/2009 03:57:11 PM 948 Views
I think it's possible that Slayer could have killed Asmo - 28/12/2009 04:35:57 PM 866 Views
The explanations - 28/12/2009 05:06:02 PM 1121 Views
Perhaps, I still don't buy it, but if that's the way it turns out I won't be shocked - 28/12/2009 05:20:06 PM 1058 Views
Your reaction would be similar to BS's then - 28/12/2009 05:57:44 PM 1982 Views
I don't really have a strong opinion on which suspect did it - 28/12/2009 06:03:07 PM 867 Views
Well... - 28/12/2009 06:42:16 PM 911 Views
Indeed *NM* - 28/12/2009 06:55:52 PM 453 Views
Re: The explanations - 28/12/2009 08:01:19 PM 801 Views
The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... - 28/12/2009 08:13:07 PM 905 Views
Re: The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... - 28/12/2009 10:19:24 PM 981 Views
The reason is... - 29/12/2009 11:58:24 AM 931 Views
The reasoning is very weak. - 29/12/2009 03:34:19 PM 950 Views
If you mean... - 29/12/2009 04:01:25 PM 1020 Views
A few points - 29/12/2009 04:14:12 PM 865 Views
You are wrong... - 29/12/2009 04:25:09 PM 857 Views
Thanks for the quote .. obviously hadn't heard that one before! - 29/12/2009 04:31:37 PM 958 Views
Key word - "possibly" - 29/12/2009 04:38:46 PM 864 Views
As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. - 29/12/2009 05:06:47 PM 829 Views
Re: As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. - 29/12/2009 06:08:09 PM 761 Views
Well, it protects you of Shadowspawn, not that bad. - 29/12/2009 06:12:04 PM 846 Views
I don't think what happened to Fain or Slayer are "gifts" - 29/12/2009 06:26:15 PM 763 Views
Slayer calls it "gifts" in his PoV - 29/12/2009 06:37:49 PM 804 Views
I think you are stretching the reality a bit - 29/12/2009 06:42:10 PM 854 Views
You confuse it a bit... - 29/12/2009 06:57:07 PM 913 Views
I think you've got it backwards - 29/12/2009 07:12:02 PM 816 Views
However... - 29/12/2009 07:16:08 PM 847 Views
I wasn't arguing that point - 29/12/2009 08:13:25 PM 1083 Views
Some things don't have to be spelled out, if they are that clear... *NM* - 29/12/2009 08:18:05 PM 812 Views
clearly they do since people are discussing it! - 29/12/2009 09:37:00 PM 783 Views
Yes; it is not readily apparant that the mark was made with the TP. - 29/12/2009 06:12:07 PM 860 Views
Sorry, but that is utter nonsense - 29/12/2009 06:24:54 PM 967 Views
You are incorrect; I'm actually thinking that you only skimmed certain sections! - 29/12/2009 06:38:37 PM 917 Views
Simply read the books and what the authors said... - 29/12/2009 06:55:42 PM 861 Views
Sorry, I think you have an opinion and read everything to support it in this case. - 29/12/2009 07:02:42 PM 826 Views
Ok, then we play dumb, if you like... - 29/12/2009 07:14:58 PM 940 Views
Because the Dark One is not merely a super channeler. - 29/12/2009 07:21:21 PM 970 Views
Well, I disagree of course... - 29/12/2009 07:36:19 PM 1093 Views
You are mistaken on quite a few counts. - 29/12/2009 04:37:51 PM 1004 Views
Actually... - 29/12/2009 05:04:54 PM 914 Views
BWB says... - 29/12/2009 05:48:40 PM 1153 Views
Exactly. *NM* - 29/12/2009 06:12:30 PM 431 Views
Well... - 29/12/2009 06:18:08 PM 971 Views
Just pointing out that your comment about Lanfear and Moggy not being assassins - 29/12/2009 06:37:21 PM 878 Views
No... - 29/12/2009 06:47:07 PM 1083 Views
Re: No... - 29/12/2009 07:00:20 PM 1042 Views
Again... - 29/12/2009 07:10:12 PM 799 Views
So you dismiss the actual assassinations the Forsaken have performed on-screen? - 29/12/2009 07:26:55 PM 826 Views
Again... - 29/12/2009 07:47:57 PM 768 Views
I think any Forsaken is capable of doing it. - 29/12/2009 08:05:10 PM 863 Views
Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. - 29/12/2009 08:16:50 PM 723 Views
Re: Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. - 29/12/2009 09:21:23 PM 820 Views
She kidnapped the Sharan's ... who's to say she hasn't killed others? *NM* - 29/12/2009 08:17:28 PM 437 Views
Yeah, after TFoH! We are looking for clues before LoC, guys! *sigh* - 29/12/2009 08:31:13 PM 714 Views
Where did I say this was a clue to her doing it? - 29/12/2009 09:58:29 PM 939 Views
I don't say... - 30/12/2009 12:08:27 PM 1044 Views
Most of what you are talking about with Slayer is discoverd after LoC - 30/12/2009 02:36:18 PM 934 Views
Re: Well... - 29/12/2009 06:41:29 PM 844 Views
It becomes clear... - 29/12/2009 06:59:03 PM 770 Views
Basically, you think Slayer killed him. I do not. Nor do I care. - 29/12/2009 07:04:20 PM 733 Views
Fair enough. *NM* - 29/12/2009 07:17:22 PM 482 Views
Re: Slayer also hunts Rand - 28/12/2009 04:39:36 PM 1035 Views
As said... - 28/12/2009 04:54:07 PM 836 Views
Re: As said... - 28/12/2009 07:49:22 PM 828 Views
It's rather the TP, which makes Slayer inhuman... - 28/12/2009 08:21:20 PM 802 Views
makes you wonder - 28/12/2009 09:45:08 PM 898 Views
Re: makes you wonder - 28/12/2009 10:16:57 PM 903 Views
I think... - 29/12/2009 12:03:41 PM 804 Views
Fain's Myrddraal killed asmo LOL *NM* - 29/12/2009 05:26:22 AM 491 Views
It is quite obvious that it was Mistress Laras. *NM* - 29/12/2009 03:35:36 PM 456 Views
Intuitively, even. *NM* - 29/12/2009 06:03:13 PM 444 Views

Reply to Message