I don't mean to make any generalisations about you, and I'm sorry if that's what I sounded like.
Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 04/02/2010 12:24:34 AM
that its a possibility, and certainly what I would do if I was Graendal. I've said it time and time again, I think that she's dead.
I don't know if you know me that well or not. But that's hardly my style. I'm often one of the fewest who holds to the edict that the simple explanation is the most likely correct one. So many in wot hunt zebras when they see hoof prints, but completely overlook the horse standing right there. That's not me.
In my years at wotmania, I wrote several theories which ended up correct....and none of them were proven wrong. We're talking real theories...not MB postings on fantastical ideas. My claim to fame is my theory on the Taint on Saidin, and how Rand could get rid of it. I had that figured out a good 3 books before RJ wrote it. I know the difference in credibility.
Just don't confuse this to mean unfounded assertions have similar credibility to coherent conclusions.
I don't know if you know me that well or not. But that's hardly my style. I'm often one of the fewest who holds to the edict that the simple explanation is the most likely correct one. So many in wot hunt zebras when they see hoof prints, but completely overlook the horse standing right there. That's not me.
In my years at wotmania, I wrote several theories which ended up correct....and none of them were proven wrong. We're talking real theories...not MB postings on fantastical ideas. My claim to fame is my theory on the Taint on Saidin, and how Rand could get rid of it. I had that figured out a good 3 books before RJ wrote it. I know the difference in credibility.
I was only talking about this post. You basically simply wrote a post conjuring up a hypothetical scenario, then said 'prove me wrong'. I would rather you have conjured that scenario and said 'this is what happened because of this, this, and this.' That is what I meant by unfounded assertions, and that's what it was.
Incidentally, I wouldn't consider Graendal a main character.
She's been in active play since, what, book 4? We've had chapters from her point of view. She's been one of the main-Shadow characters for a long time....
I'd consider her a main character. *shrug*
~Jeordam
I mostly remember her as being a secondary character in Sammael's plotline... I kept expecting her to come to the fron in this book, but she really didn't.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
So your name is Graendal....
- 01/02/2010 09:18:00 PM
2027 Views
one of the reasons I'm at a loss with her death ... along with the lead-up being clumsy *NM*
- 01/02/2010 09:36:29 PM
887 Views
She very well...
- 01/02/2010 11:13:50 PM
1377 Views
Ha! "Graendal actually kills Asmodean". A very bold claim.
*NM*
- 02/02/2010 10:51:40 AM
782 Views
*NM*
- 02/02/2010 10:51:40 AM
782 Views
Bold like saying that water is wet....
- 02/02/2010 05:46:54 PM
933 Views
I am now split with a 80% belief it's Graendal and 20% that it's Moghedien *NM*
- 02/02/2010 06:11:47 PM
570 Views
Moghedien....
- 02/02/2010 06:15:41 PM
1084 Views
The a'dam doesn't limit your ability to enter T'A'R
- 02/02/2010 06:36:26 PM
1074 Views
Yeah.....
- 02/02/2010 06:46:50 PM
1244 Views
Re: Yeah.....
- 02/02/2010 07:42:59 PM
985 Views
Moghedien? Really?
- 02/02/2010 07:56:33 PM
1080 Views
Re: Moghedien? Really?
- 02/02/2010 09:03:54 PM
1121 Views
Egwene was faintly forkrooted, not heavily.
- 02/02/2010 10:24:55 PM
1002 Views
It was heavy enough to nullify her ability almost completely by TGS
- 02/02/2010 10:38:04 PM
973 Views
The lead up was clumsy because her death scene was rather forced.
- 09/02/2010 11:11:21 PM
1174 Views
Couple of flaws in that reasoning
- 02/02/2010 07:56:35 AM
1356 Views
Come on now....
- 02/02/2010 04:58:34 PM
1259 Views
IMO
- 02/02/2010 05:58:10 PM
1055 Views
This could go either way....
- 02/02/2010 06:14:21 PM
1187 Views
RE: Strength and Compulsion
- 02/02/2010 06:31:13 PM
1186 Views
I never figured that Verin was weak....or even middling.
- 02/02/2010 06:57:11 PM
1070 Views
Re: I never figured that Verin was weak....or even middling.
- 02/02/2010 07:51:15 PM
1093 Views
The thing is...
- 02/02/2010 09:39:18 AM
1085 Views
My name is Graendal? My parents will be so confused.
- 02/02/2010 02:19:26 PM
1017 Views
A conclusion with an explanation built around it.
- 02/02/2010 10:22:29 PM
1103 Views
So...like the theory of Macro Evolution? People seem to believe that.....
- 02/02/2010 11:22:41 PM
1156 Views
...
- 03/02/2010 01:23:06 AM
1017 Views
Ok...I'm just saying...
- 03/02/2010 04:00:46 PM
1193 Views
I don't mean to make any generalisations about you, and I'm sorry if that's what I sounded like.
- 04/02/2010 12:24:34 AM
1013 Views
That's ridiculous
- 02/02/2010 11:39:41 PM
1032 Views
Hold on now....
- 02/02/2010 11:51:32 PM
1220 Views
Re: Hold on now....
- 03/02/2010 02:52:07 AM
1021 Views
Your theory breaks down because of something Brandon said.
- 03/02/2010 03:49:58 AM
948 Views
I disagree.
- 03/02/2010 05:31:39 AM
922 Views
But how many previously unseen weaves have had such huge implications?
- 03/02/2010 01:29:15 PM
1224 Views
Two things come to mind...
- 03/02/2010 03:50:38 PM
1120 Views
I don't really think this is relevant
- 03/02/2010 05:03:51 PM
1053 Views
There's a difference....
- 03/02/2010 06:01:30 PM
1100 Views
I know there is. You're the one who brought up the weaves being picked apart
- 03/02/2010 06:37:40 PM
1062 Views
- 03/02/2010 06:37:40 PM
1062 Views
*grins*
- 03/02/2010 06:42:54 PM
1100 Views
But again...
- 03/02/2010 06:59:18 PM
989 Views
sure we do
- 03/02/2010 07:03:40 PM
967 Views
Each of them was at the very least confused/disoriented afterwards.
- 03/02/2010 07:14:24 PM
948 Views
But here's the thing...
- 03/02/2010 07:36:42 PM
1066 Views
Re: Each of them was at the very least confused/disoriented afterwards.
- 03/02/2010 07:37:58 PM
965 Views
...
- 03/02/2010 07:42:07 PM
990 Views
Re: ...
- 03/02/2010 07:59:26 PM
988 Views
But
- 03/02/2010 08:04:27 PM
1120 Views
I think it would be obvious if Ituralde was acting different
- 03/02/2010 08:18:50 PM
1286 Views
Hrm
- 03/02/2010 08:36:12 PM
1183 Views

*NM*
*NM*