Active Users:595 Time:19/03/2026 05:43:43 AM
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books PhotoJim Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM
I like to practice free love with my books. I'll almost always have a couple books going.

My wife asked my, "How can you start another book when you are still reading two others?"
"Easy." I explained. "You watch Bones right?"
"Yes" she nodded not knowing where I was going with this.
"You also watch Survivor, Fringe, and football on Sundays." I continued. "And I'm more than willing to bet that if a new episode of Chuck came out, you would be glued to the screen right now."
She tried to tell me that it was different somehow. I don't see how. Episodes vs. chapters. Often at the end of each you are left wondering what comes next.
Everybody was Kung Fu fighting!

Not to be rude but who are you? And I suppose equally important, where are we?

The Wotmaniac formerly known as nomad.
Reply to message
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were? - 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM 1984 Views
I'm reading three books right now. - 23/09/2009 09:30:53 AM 1715 Views
I am on 20 - 23/09/2009 10:00:39 AM 1483 Views
Yes - 23/09/2009 09:41:31 AM 1679 Views
Re: Yes - 23/09/2009 09:59:16 AM 1574 Views
Not really - 23/09/2009 06:10:18 PM 1687 Views
I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM 1574 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM 1601 Views
Hmm - 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM 1571 Views
Re: Hmm - 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM 1538 Views
I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:38:14 PM 1602 Views
Re: I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:39:47 PM 1380 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM 1574 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 01:17:05 PM 1563 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 05/10/2009 09:17:10 AM 1688 Views
Yes. - 23/09/2009 12:17:14 PM 1482 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 01:17:41 PM 1539 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 02:55:43 PM 1474 Views
Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 12:44:45 PM 1592 Views
Re: Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 01:18:58 PM 1597 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM 1438 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM 1519 Views
If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:26:06 PM 1444 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:38:59 PM 1604 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 03:15:12 PM 1438 Views
Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 01:49:00 PM 1570 Views
Re: Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 02:36:23 PM 1513 Views
Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:56:47 PM 1529 Views
Re: Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:58:28 PM 1494 Views
Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:14:02 PM 1475 Views
Re: Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:16:42 PM 1449 Views
Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:15:30 PM 1525 Views
Re: Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:17:35 PM 1548 Views
It sucks, believe me. - 02/10/2009 03:46:47 PM 1971 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now - 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM 1532 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now. - 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM 1611 Views
It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM 1463 Views
Re: It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:55:27 PM 1561 Views
Bought it. - 24/09/2009 04:13:44 PM 1462 Views
Re: Bought it. - 24/09/2009 05:39:16 PM 1511 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour. - 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM 1500 Views
Pfff, dream on *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:44:22 PM 754 Views
Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM 1493 Views
Re: Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 05:31:04 PM 1537 Views
some of them are starting to feel neglected, though. - 23/09/2009 05:44:23 PM 1574 Views
This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM 1524 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM 1569 Views
best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM 1567 Views
Re: best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM 1404 Views
that's a weird argument. - 23/09/2009 08:31:01 PM 1543 Views
Re: that's a weird argument. - 24/09/2009 09:18:57 AM 1485 Views
I was about to reply with something similar. - 23/09/2009 05:52:07 PM 1558 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM 1644 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM 1494 Views
That it is. - 23/09/2009 11:24:45 PM 1448 Views
hells no - 23/09/2009 07:27:49 PM 1495 Views
Sensible *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:54:22 PM 637 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM 1403 Views
Re: Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:55:06 PM 1385 Views
I don't read books I find boring unless I'm required to. - 23/09/2009 11:36:17 PM 1481 Views
nope - 23/09/2009 07:58:53 PM 1362 Views
Re: nope - 24/09/2009 09:18:28 AM 1451 Views
RT stole my post title. - 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM 1617 Views
Re: RT stole my post title. - 24/09/2009 09:54:13 AM 1402 Views
Well - 24/09/2009 08:00:12 PM 1694 Views
Re: Well - 25/09/2009 09:31:29 AM 1867 Views
Very Monogamous - 23/09/2009 11:02:32 PM 1649 Views
Re: Very Monogamous - 24/09/2009 09:55:50 AM 1546 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy. - 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM 1519 Views
In all things, or just marriage and books? *NM* - 24/09/2009 10:03:21 AM 736 Views
In principle I have nothing against multiple spouses. - 24/09/2009 11:08:49 PM 1475 Views
Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM 1564 Views
Re: Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM 1593 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM 1386 Views
Re: - 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM 1363 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM 1413 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM 1586 Views
That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM 1540 Views
Re: That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM 1386 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one - 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM 1477 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe - 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM 1515 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no? - 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM 1645 Views
where? - 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM 1414 Views
Here - 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM 1576 Views
I have of course read A Study in Emerald - 24/09/2009 03:48:45 PM 1480 Views
That's the earlier anthology - 24/09/2009 03:56:42 PM 1455 Views
Sort of - 24/09/2009 12:30:04 AM 1499 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 10:05:07 AM 1478 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 02:27:14 PM 1510 Views
Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 04:43:06 AM 1554 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 10:06:10 AM 1502 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 26/09/2009 05:06:07 PM 1700 Views
No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 06:22:24 AM 1494 Views
Re: No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 10:08:26 AM 1631 Views
Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM 1510 Views
Re: Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 02:59:42 PM 1553 Views
No, confusion has nothing to do with it. - 25/09/2009 02:08:16 PM 1616 Views
mmm, polyamory! - 24/09/2009 05:48:04 PM 1466 Views
People must understand that we have urges that cannot always be - 24/09/2009 05:49:25 PM 1384 Views
I used to only read one at a time - 24/09/2009 08:46:46 PM 1632 Views
Re: I used to only read one at a time - 25/09/2009 09:33:30 AM 1573 Views
Only read One book at a time. You make me feel bad. - 25/09/2009 02:44:51 AM 1439 Views
On behalf of my books? - 25/09/2009 09:40:37 AM 1335 Views
Honestly, - 25/09/2009 03:07:53 AM 1592 Views
Re: Honestly, - 25/09/2009 09:42:04 AM 1479 Views
I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 04:50:48 PM 1547 Views
Re: I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 07:05:21 PM 1624 Views
No - 02/10/2009 05:02:51 PM 1555 Views
Re: No - 02/10/2009 07:45:39 PM 1637 Views

Reply to Message