Active Users:392 Time:01/05/2025 06:10:42 PM
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books PhotoJim Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM
I like to practice free love with my books. I'll almost always have a couple books going.

My wife asked my, "How can you start another book when you are still reading two others?"
"Easy." I explained. "You watch Bones right?"
"Yes" she nodded not knowing where I was going with this.
"You also watch Survivor, Fringe, and football on Sundays." I continued. "And I'm more than willing to bet that if a new episode of Chuck came out, you would be glued to the screen right now."
She tried to tell me that it was different somehow. I don't see how. Episodes vs. chapters. Often at the end of each you are left wondering what comes next.
Everybody was Kung Fu fighting!

Not to be rude but who are you? And I suppose equally important, where are we?

The Wotmaniac formerly known as nomad.
Reply to message
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were? - 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM 1824 Views
I'm reading three books right now. - 23/09/2009 09:30:53 AM 1521 Views
I am on 20 - 23/09/2009 10:00:39 AM 1329 Views
Yes - 23/09/2009 09:41:31 AM 1479 Views
Re: Yes - 23/09/2009 09:59:16 AM 1436 Views
Not really - 23/09/2009 06:10:18 PM 1465 Views
I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM 1409 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM 1448 Views
Hmm - 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM 1423 Views
Re: Hmm - 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM 1392 Views
I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:38:14 PM 1450 Views
Re: I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:39:47 PM 1220 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM 1354 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 01:17:05 PM 1400 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 05/10/2009 09:17:10 AM 1443 Views
Yes. - 23/09/2009 12:17:14 PM 1317 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 01:17:41 PM 1386 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 02:55:43 PM 1321 Views
Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 12:44:45 PM 1422 Views
Re: Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 01:18:58 PM 1404 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM 1296 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM 1361 Views
If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:26:06 PM 1289 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:38:59 PM 1446 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 03:15:12 PM 1285 Views
Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 01:49:00 PM 1409 Views
Re: Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 02:36:23 PM 1354 Views
Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:56:47 PM 1362 Views
Re: Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:58:28 PM 1326 Views
Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:14:02 PM 1303 Views
Re: Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:16:42 PM 1289 Views
Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:15:30 PM 1356 Views
Re: Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:17:35 PM 1388 Views
It sucks, believe me. - 02/10/2009 03:46:47 PM 1808 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now - 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM 1378 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now. - 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM 1439 Views
It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM 1280 Views
Re: It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:55:27 PM 1386 Views
Bought it. - 24/09/2009 04:13:44 PM 1335 Views
Re: Bought it. - 24/09/2009 05:39:16 PM 1341 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour. - 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM 1340 Views
Pfff, dream on *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:44:22 PM 686 Views
Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM 1331 Views
Re: Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 05:31:04 PM 1369 Views
some of them are starting to feel neglected, though. - 23/09/2009 05:44:23 PM 1402 Views
This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM 1372 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM 1406 Views
best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM 1399 Views
Re: best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM 1231 Views
that's a weird argument. - 23/09/2009 08:31:01 PM 1386 Views
Re: that's a weird argument. - 24/09/2009 09:18:57 AM 1304 Views
I was about to reply with something similar. - 23/09/2009 05:52:07 PM 1381 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM 1431 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM 1343 Views
That it is. - 23/09/2009 11:24:45 PM 1299 Views
hells no - 23/09/2009 07:27:49 PM 1335 Views
Sensible *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:54:22 PM 571 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM 1246 Views
Re: Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:55:06 PM 1231 Views
I don't read books I find boring unless I'm required to. - 23/09/2009 11:36:17 PM 1316 Views
nope - 23/09/2009 07:58:53 PM 1230 Views
Re: nope - 24/09/2009 09:18:28 AM 1299 Views
RT stole my post title. - 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM 1452 Views
Re: RT stole my post title. - 24/09/2009 09:54:13 AM 1211 Views
Well - 24/09/2009 08:00:12 PM 1568 Views
Re: Well - 25/09/2009 09:31:29 AM 1713 Views
Very Monogamous - 23/09/2009 11:02:32 PM 1487 Views
Re: Very Monogamous - 24/09/2009 09:55:50 AM 1374 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy. - 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM 1365 Views
In all things, or just marriage and books? *NM* - 24/09/2009 10:03:21 AM 671 Views
In principle I have nothing against multiple spouses. - 24/09/2009 11:08:49 PM 1309 Views
Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM 1412 Views
Re: Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM 1436 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM 1250 Views
Re: - 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM 1211 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM 1251 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM 1421 Views
That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM 1350 Views
Re: That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM 1229 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one - 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM 1314 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe - 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM 1382 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no? - 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM 1494 Views
where? - 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM 1264 Views
Here - 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM 1394 Views
I have of course read A Study in Emerald - 24/09/2009 03:48:45 PM 1331 Views
That's the earlier anthology - 24/09/2009 03:56:42 PM 1283 Views
Sort of - 24/09/2009 12:30:04 AM 1356 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 10:05:07 AM 1324 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 02:27:14 PM 1369 Views
Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 04:43:06 AM 1398 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 10:06:10 AM 1356 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 26/09/2009 05:06:07 PM 1542 Views
No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 06:22:24 AM 1354 Views
Re: No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 10:08:26 AM 1463 Views
Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM 1353 Views
Re: Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 02:59:42 PM 1402 Views
No, confusion has nothing to do with it. - 25/09/2009 02:08:16 PM 1457 Views
mmm, polyamory! - 24/09/2009 05:48:04 PM 1309 Views
People must understand that we have urges that cannot always be - 24/09/2009 05:49:25 PM 1206 Views
I used to only read one at a time - 24/09/2009 08:46:46 PM 1478 Views
Re: I used to only read one at a time - 25/09/2009 09:33:30 AM 1405 Views
Only read One book at a time. You make me feel bad. - 25/09/2009 02:44:51 AM 1292 Views
On behalf of my books? - 25/09/2009 09:40:37 AM 1181 Views
Honestly, - 25/09/2009 03:07:53 AM 1414 Views
Re: Honestly, - 25/09/2009 09:42:04 AM 1317 Views
I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 04:50:48 PM 1391 Views
Re: I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 07:05:21 PM 1460 Views
No - 02/10/2009 05:02:51 PM 1391 Views
Re: No - 02/10/2009 07:45:39 PM 1449 Views

Reply to Message