Active Users:462 Time:16/09/2026 02:57:21 AM
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books PhotoJim Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM
I like to practice free love with my books. I'll almost always have a couple books going.

My wife asked my, "How can you start another book when you are still reading two others?"
"Easy." I explained. "You watch Bones right?"
"Yes" she nodded not knowing where I was going with this.
"You also watch Survivor, Fringe, and football on Sundays." I continued. "And I'm more than willing to bet that if a new episode of Chuck came out, you would be glued to the screen right now."
She tried to tell me that it was different somehow. I don't see how. Episodes vs. chapters. Often at the end of each you are left wondering what comes next.
Everybody was Kung Fu fighting!

Not to be rude but who are you? And I suppose equally important, where are we?

The Wotmaniac formerly known as nomad.
Reply to message
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were? - 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM 2092 Views
I'm reading three books right now. - 23/09/2009 09:30:53 AM 1839 Views
I am on 20 - 23/09/2009 10:00:39 AM 1574 Views
Yes - 23/09/2009 09:41:31 AM 1784 Views
Re: Yes - 23/09/2009 09:59:16 AM 1670 Views
Not really - 23/09/2009 06:10:18 PM 1793 Views
I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM 1675 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM 1708 Views
Hmm - 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM 1680 Views
Re: Hmm - 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM 1636 Views
I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:38:14 PM 1706 Views
Re: I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:39:47 PM 1487 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM 1674 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 01:17:05 PM 1659 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 05/10/2009 09:17:10 AM 1792 Views
Yes. - 23/09/2009 12:17:14 PM 1596 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 01:17:41 PM 1632 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 02:55:43 PM 1577 Views
Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 12:44:45 PM 1715 Views
Re: Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 01:18:58 PM 1695 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM 1531 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM 1618 Views
If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:26:06 PM 1544 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:38:59 PM 1706 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 03:15:12 PM 1545 Views
Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 01:49:00 PM 1659 Views
Re: Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 02:36:23 PM 1613 Views
Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:56:47 PM 1638 Views
Re: Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:58:28 PM 1598 Views
Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:14:02 PM 1579 Views
Re: Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:16:42 PM 1564 Views
Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:15:30 PM 1642 Views
Re: Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:17:35 PM 1655 Views
It sucks, believe me. - 02/10/2009 03:46:47 PM 2072 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now - 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM 1643 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now. - 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM 1730 Views
It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM 1566 Views
Re: It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:55:27 PM 1674 Views
Bought it. - 24/09/2009 04:13:44 PM 1562 Views
Re: Bought it. - 24/09/2009 05:39:16 PM 1617 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour. - 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM 1594 Views
Pfff, dream on *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:44:22 PM 808 Views
Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM 1600 Views
Re: Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 05:31:04 PM 1633 Views
some of them are starting to feel neglected, though. - 23/09/2009 05:44:23 PM 1671 Views
This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM 1641 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM 1678 Views
best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM 1677 Views
Re: best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM 1509 Views
that's a weird argument. - 23/09/2009 08:31:01 PM 1646 Views
Re: that's a weird argument. - 24/09/2009 09:18:57 AM 1591 Views
I was about to reply with something similar. - 23/09/2009 05:52:07 PM 1682 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM 1752 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM 1589 Views
That it is. - 23/09/2009 11:24:45 PM 1543 Views
hells no - 23/09/2009 07:27:49 PM 1587 Views
Sensible *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:54:22 PM 692 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM 1492 Views
Re: Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:55:06 PM 1486 Views
I don't read books I find boring unless I'm required to. - 23/09/2009 11:36:17 PM 1585 Views
nope - 23/09/2009 07:58:53 PM 1448 Views
Re: nope - 24/09/2009 09:18:28 AM 1546 Views
RT stole my post title. - 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM 1722 Views
Re: RT stole my post title. - 24/09/2009 09:54:13 AM 1499 Views
Well - 24/09/2009 08:00:12 PM 1779 Views
Re: Well - 25/09/2009 09:31:29 AM 1966 Views
Very Monogamous - 23/09/2009 11:02:32 PM 1761 Views
Re: Very Monogamous - 24/09/2009 09:55:50 AM 1638 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy. - 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM 1622 Views
In all things, or just marriage and books? *NM* - 24/09/2009 10:03:21 AM 797 Views
In principle I have nothing against multiple spouses. - 24/09/2009 11:08:49 PM 1588 Views
Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM 1662 Views
Re: Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM 1697 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM 1477 Views
Re: - 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM 1469 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM 1513 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM 1699 Views
That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM 1637 Views
Re: That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM 1477 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one - 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM 1616 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe - 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM 1604 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no? - 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM 1798 Views
where? - 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM 1519 Views
Here - 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM 1687 Views
I have of course read A Study in Emerald - 24/09/2009 03:48:45 PM 1582 Views
That's the earlier anthology - 24/09/2009 03:56:42 PM 1560 Views
Sort of - 24/09/2009 12:30:04 AM 1595 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 10:05:07 AM 1573 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 02:27:14 PM 1618 Views
Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 04:43:06 AM 1657 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 10:06:10 AM 1599 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 26/09/2009 05:06:07 PM 1788 Views
No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 06:22:24 AM 1586 Views
Re: No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 10:08:26 AM 1733 Views
Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM 1606 Views
Re: Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 02:59:42 PM 1698 Views
No, confusion has nothing to do with it. - 25/09/2009 02:08:16 PM 1718 Views
mmm, polyamory! - 24/09/2009 05:48:04 PM 1575 Views
People must understand that we have urges that cannot always be - 24/09/2009 05:49:25 PM 1477 Views
I used to only read one at a time - 24/09/2009 08:46:46 PM 1744 Views
Re: I used to only read one at a time - 25/09/2009 09:33:30 AM 1683 Views
Only read One book at a time. You make me feel bad. - 25/09/2009 02:44:51 AM 1542 Views
On behalf of my books? - 25/09/2009 09:40:37 AM 1436 Views
Honestly, - 25/09/2009 03:07:53 AM 1695 Views
Re: Honestly, - 25/09/2009 09:42:04 AM 1577 Views
I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 04:50:48 PM 1637 Views
Re: I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 07:05:21 PM 1723 Views
No - 02/10/2009 05:02:51 PM 1651 Views
Re: No - 02/10/2009 07:45:39 PM 1731 Views

Reply to Message