Active Users:654 Time:03/08/2025 03:20:36 PM
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books PhotoJim Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM
I like to practice free love with my books. I'll almost always have a couple books going.

My wife asked my, "How can you start another book when you are still reading two others?"
"Easy." I explained. "You watch Bones right?"
"Yes" she nodded not knowing where I was going with this.
"You also watch Survivor, Fringe, and football on Sundays." I continued. "And I'm more than willing to bet that if a new episode of Chuck came out, you would be glued to the screen right now."
She tried to tell me that it was different somehow. I don't see how. Episodes vs. chapters. Often at the end of each you are left wondering what comes next.
Everybody was Kung Fu fighting!

Not to be rude but who are you? And I suppose equally important, where are we?

The Wotmaniac formerly known as nomad.
Reply to message
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were? - 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM 1867 Views
I'm reading three books right now. - 23/09/2009 09:30:53 AM 1574 Views
I am on 20 - 23/09/2009 10:00:39 AM 1370 Views
Yes - 23/09/2009 09:41:31 AM 1578 Views
Re: Yes - 23/09/2009 09:59:16 AM 1477 Views
Not really - 23/09/2009 06:10:18 PM 1564 Views
I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM 1451 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM 1489 Views
Hmm - 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM 1461 Views
Re: Hmm - 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM 1435 Views
I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:38:14 PM 1489 Views
Re: I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:39:47 PM 1265 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM 1456 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 01:17:05 PM 1443 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 05/10/2009 09:17:10 AM 1545 Views
Yes. - 23/09/2009 12:17:14 PM 1355 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 01:17:41 PM 1429 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 02:55:43 PM 1364 Views
Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 12:44:45 PM 1457 Views
Re: Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 01:18:58 PM 1452 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM 1338 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM 1401 Views
If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:26:06 PM 1328 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:38:59 PM 1488 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 03:15:12 PM 1327 Views
Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 01:49:00 PM 1449 Views
Re: Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 02:36:23 PM 1395 Views
Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:56:47 PM 1406 Views
Re: Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:58:28 PM 1370 Views
Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:14:02 PM 1353 Views
Re: Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:16:42 PM 1330 Views
Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:15:30 PM 1399 Views
Re: Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:17:35 PM 1430 Views
It sucks, believe me. - 02/10/2009 03:46:47 PM 1851 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now - 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM 1421 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now. - 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM 1485 Views
It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM 1320 Views
Re: It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:55:27 PM 1432 Views
Bought it. - 24/09/2009 04:13:44 PM 1371 Views
Re: Bought it. - 24/09/2009 05:39:16 PM 1388 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour. - 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM 1383 Views
Pfff, dream on *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:44:22 PM 701 Views
Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM 1371 Views
Re: Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 05:31:04 PM 1412 Views
some of them are starting to feel neglected, though. - 23/09/2009 05:44:23 PM 1438 Views
This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM 1412 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM 1448 Views
best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM 1436 Views
Re: best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM 1270 Views
that's a weird argument. - 23/09/2009 08:31:01 PM 1425 Views
Re: that's a weird argument. - 24/09/2009 09:18:57 AM 1352 Views
I was about to reply with something similar. - 23/09/2009 05:52:07 PM 1416 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM 1486 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM 1380 Views
That it is. - 23/09/2009 11:24:45 PM 1337 Views
hells no - 23/09/2009 07:27:49 PM 1377 Views
Sensible *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:54:22 PM 584 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM 1285 Views
Re: Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:55:06 PM 1269 Views
I don't read books I find boring unless I'm required to. - 23/09/2009 11:36:17 PM 1355 Views
nope - 23/09/2009 07:58:53 PM 1266 Views
Re: nope - 24/09/2009 09:18:28 AM 1344 Views
RT stole my post title. - 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM 1488 Views
Re: RT stole my post title. - 24/09/2009 09:54:13 AM 1259 Views
Well - 24/09/2009 08:00:12 PM 1610 Views
Re: Well - 25/09/2009 09:31:29 AM 1755 Views
Very Monogamous - 23/09/2009 11:02:32 PM 1539 Views
Re: Very Monogamous - 24/09/2009 09:55:50 AM 1425 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy. - 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM 1404 Views
In all things, or just marriage and books? *NM* - 24/09/2009 10:03:21 AM 692 Views
In principle I have nothing against multiple spouses. - 24/09/2009 11:08:49 PM 1341 Views
Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM 1449 Views
Re: Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM 1478 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM 1288 Views
Re: - 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM 1255 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM 1291 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM 1467 Views
That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM 1389 Views
Re: That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM 1267 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one - 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM 1363 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe - 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM 1419 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no? - 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM 1532 Views
where? - 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM 1302 Views
Here - 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM 1437 Views
I have of course read A Study in Emerald - 24/09/2009 03:48:45 PM 1370 Views
That's the earlier anthology - 24/09/2009 03:56:42 PM 1327 Views
Sort of - 24/09/2009 12:30:04 AM 1393 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 10:05:07 AM 1374 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 02:27:14 PM 1409 Views
Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 04:43:06 AM 1439 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 10:06:10 AM 1394 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 26/09/2009 05:06:07 PM 1585 Views
No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 06:22:24 AM 1391 Views
Re: No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 10:08:26 AM 1517 Views
Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM 1393 Views
Re: Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 02:59:42 PM 1438 Views
No, confusion has nothing to do with it. - 25/09/2009 02:08:16 PM 1508 Views
mmm, polyamory! - 24/09/2009 05:48:04 PM 1349 Views
People must understand that we have urges that cannot always be - 24/09/2009 05:49:25 PM 1274 Views
I used to only read one at a time - 24/09/2009 08:46:46 PM 1518 Views
Re: I used to only read one at a time - 25/09/2009 09:33:30 AM 1446 Views
Only read One book at a time. You make me feel bad. - 25/09/2009 02:44:51 AM 1326 Views
On behalf of my books? - 25/09/2009 09:40:37 AM 1220 Views
Honestly, - 25/09/2009 03:07:53 AM 1460 Views
Re: Honestly, - 25/09/2009 09:42:04 AM 1355 Views
I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 04:50:48 PM 1433 Views
Re: I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 07:05:21 PM 1501 Views
No - 02/10/2009 05:02:51 PM 1430 Views
Re: No - 02/10/2009 07:45:39 PM 1519 Views

Reply to Message