Active Users:468 Time:03/05/2025 02:23:27 AM
In a sense, aren't they already? Larry Send a noteboard - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM


In all seriousness, I think that should be something that ought to be changed as a compromise of sorts. Otherwise, works by dead 4x great-grandfathers still being part of copyright and possibly estate lawsuits (which are more frequent than some realize) would be the case. Not quite what the original copyright laws of the 19th century had in mind when they aimed to protect the living authors and not those who would be born after his grandchildren had died off. I think 70 years after author death is a good range, but I will also admit that corporations should have different protections since that is the heart and soul of their existence.


I don't think corporations should have more rights than people. It's one thing to claim they're people and get people's rights but what winds up happening is they get substantially preferential treatment, which is ridiculous and harmful. That would certainly stifle creativity.


I didn't say anything about "more rights." I'm just being sanguine about this, realizing that likely copyright protections will be extended indefinitely when the copyright holders are corporations.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D. - 03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM 1876 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public. - 04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM 1007 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works? - 04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM 932 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc. - 04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM 910 Views
That's not the point, though. - 05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM 989 Views
???? - 05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM 957 Views
Re: ???? - 05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM 993 Views
not to mention public libraries *NM* - 05/01/2012 03:21:04 PM 520 Views
Blame Disney. *NM* - 04/01/2012 05:48:00 PM 665 Views
I don't get it. - 04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM 1219 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain. - 04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM 1022 Views
Answering you specifically - 05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM 959 Views
But that doesn't make sense. - 05/01/2012 07:18:08 PM 1128 Views
Here's the gist of it. - 06/01/2012 04:18:29 PM 951 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway) - 04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM 990 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM 900 Views
Copyrights stifle creativity. - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 986 Views
Re: Copyrights stifle creativity. - 06/01/2012 04:39:24 PM 1390 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM 926 Views
Why. - 06/01/2012 05:05:20 PM 1532 Views
That is a very confusing article. - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM 1049 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different - 04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM 978 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies? - 05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM 933 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM* - 05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM 418 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics... - 05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM 1090 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM* - 06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM 457 Views
Except of course they haven't copyrighted them... - 06/01/2012 01:53:01 AM 905 Views
nice theory but you can make a Little Mermaid movie if you want - 06/01/2012 02:48:47 PM 962 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM 1081 Views
Do you really want corporations to be immortal? - 06/01/2012 12:50:11 AM 981 Views
In a sense, aren't they already? - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM 1072 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM 987 Views
It's a thorny issue and I largely agree with you - 06/01/2012 02:50:24 AM 1007 Views
Huh... apparently, Mickey Mouse is already Public Domain anyway - 06/01/2012 07:30:36 AM 1158 Views
Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM 1106 Views
Re: Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM 890 Views
Re: the piracy issues - 06/01/2012 06:30:46 AM 1090 Views
Book piracy - 06/01/2012 05:21:40 PM 1196 Views
corporations have always had rights - 06/01/2012 04:08:12 PM 942 Views

Reply to Message