Active Users:758 Time:17/05/2026 08:08:35 PM
In a sense, aren't they already? Larry Send a noteboard - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM


In all seriousness, I think that should be something that ought to be changed as a compromise of sorts. Otherwise, works by dead 4x great-grandfathers still being part of copyright and possibly estate lawsuits (which are more frequent than some realize) would be the case. Not quite what the original copyright laws of the 19th century had in mind when they aimed to protect the living authors and not those who would be born after his grandchildren had died off. I think 70 years after author death is a good range, but I will also admit that corporations should have different protections since that is the heart and soul of their existence.


I don't think corporations should have more rights than people. It's one thing to claim they're people and get people's rights but what winds up happening is they get substantially preferential treatment, which is ridiculous and harmful. That would certainly stifle creativity.


I didn't say anything about "more rights." I'm just being sanguine about this, realizing that likely copyright protections will be extended indefinitely when the copyright holders are corporations.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D. - 03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM 2060 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public. - 04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM 1174 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works? - 04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM 1135 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc. - 04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM 1085 Views
That's not the point, though. - 05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM 1162 Views
???? - 05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM 1118 Views
Re: ???? - 05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM 1165 Views
not to mention public libraries *NM* - 05/01/2012 03:21:04 PM 601 Views
Blame Disney. *NM* - 04/01/2012 05:48:00 PM 756 Views
I don't get it. - 04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM 1435 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain. - 04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM 1222 Views
Answering you specifically - 05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM 1109 Views
But that doesn't make sense. - 05/01/2012 07:18:08 PM 1311 Views
Here's the gist of it. - 06/01/2012 04:18:29 PM 1137 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway) - 04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM 1197 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM 1078 Views
Copyrights stifle creativity. - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 1173 Views
Re: Copyrights stifle creativity. - 06/01/2012 04:39:24 PM 1592 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM 1082 Views
Why. - 06/01/2012 05:05:20 PM 1753 Views
That is a very confusing article. - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM 1244 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different - 04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM 1174 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies? - 05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM 1102 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM* - 05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM 494 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics... - 05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM 1248 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM* - 06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM 530 Views
Except of course they haven't copyrighted them... - 06/01/2012 01:53:01 AM 1066 Views
nice theory but you can make a Little Mermaid movie if you want - 06/01/2012 02:48:47 PM 1134 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM 1271 Views
Do you really want corporations to be immortal? - 06/01/2012 12:50:11 AM 1152 Views
In a sense, aren't they already? - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM 1233 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM 1159 Views
It's a thorny issue and I largely agree with you - 06/01/2012 02:50:24 AM 1183 Views
Huh... apparently, Mickey Mouse is already Public Domain anyway - 06/01/2012 07:30:36 AM 1353 Views
Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM 1284 Views
Re: Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM 1054 Views
Re: the piracy issues - 06/01/2012 06:30:46 AM 1290 Views
Book piracy - 06/01/2012 05:21:40 PM 1370 Views
corporations have always had rights - 06/01/2012 04:08:12 PM 1122 Views

Reply to Message