Active Users:465 Time:03/05/2025 02:29:39 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
nice theory but you can make a Little Mermaid movie if you want random thoughts Send a noteboard - 06/01/2012 02:48:47 PM
You just can't make it look like the Disney adaptation of the classic.

You are also ignoring fact that Disney paid for the right to use some of those stories. Disney had to but the rights to Peter Pan and 101 Dalmatians, he couldn't just use them because they were not public domain. I think he had to pay to Jungle Book as well and if you took the time look I am sure he paid for others as well.

So he didn't just copyright them.
Reply to message
Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D. Great Lord of Chaos - 03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM 1876 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public. Rebekah - 04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM 1007 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works? Aeryn - 04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM 932 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc. Rebekah - 04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM 910 Views
That's not the point, though. Macharius - 05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM 989 Views
???? random thoughts - 05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM 957 Views
Re: ???? Macharius - 05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM 993 Views
That isn't inspiration that wanting to use the popularity of the original to promote your work random thoughts - 05/01/2012 05:04:25 PM 962 Views
not to mention public libraries *NM* random thoughts - 05/01/2012 03:21:04 PM 520 Views
Blame Disney. *NM* Vivien - 04/01/2012 05:48:00 PM 665 Views
I don't get it. Palatine - 04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM 1220 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain. Aeryn - 04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM 1022 Views
Parody is actually covered by the legal definition of fair use so doesn't break copyright. Rebekah - 04/01/2012 10:28:08 PM 1006 Views
I'm fairly sure the Jane Austen parodies do in fact use actual paragraphs... no? *NM* Legolas - 04/01/2012 10:31:32 PM 529 Views
The zombies one doesn't precisely. It's somewhat modernised. I've not read the others. Rebekah - 04/01/2012 10:32:59 PM 941 Views
Precisely the point. Vivien - 04/01/2012 10:45:01 PM 944 Views
Yes, they take tons of text from actual books. Contrast this with Ms. Rowling's reaction. *NM* Aeryn - 05/01/2012 07:01:46 PM 433 Views
If there's zero chance of needing a lawyer at some point, it's way more likely to actually happen. Vivien - 04/01/2012 10:43:23 PM 1039 Views
Regarding quotes or poem lines, they ask permission for those. Legolas - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 887 Views
Answering you specifically Palatine - 05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM 959 Views
But that doesn't make sense. Aeryn - 05/01/2012 07:18:08 PM 1128 Views
Here's the gist of it. Palatine - 06/01/2012 04:18:29 PM 952 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway) Vivien - 04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM 990 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. Palatine - 05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM 900 Views
Copyrights stifle creativity. Aeryn - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 986 Views
Re: Copyrights stifle creativity. Palatine - 06/01/2012 04:39:24 PM 1390 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. Vivien - 06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM 926 Views
Why. Palatine - 06/01/2012 05:05:20 PM 1533 Views
That is a very confusing article. Legolas - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM 1049 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different Larry - 04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM 978 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies? random thoughts - 05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM 933 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM* Aeryn - 05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM 418 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics... ranagrande - 05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM 1091 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM* Vivien - 06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM 457 Views
Except of course they haven't copyrighted them... DomA - 06/01/2012 01:53:01 AM 906 Views
nice theory but you can make a Little Mermaid movie if you want random thoughts - 06/01/2012 02:48:47 PM 963 Views
OK why is that even a point of argument? random thoughts - 06/01/2012 02:42:47 PM 933 Views
No incentive to make great new works if they can just keep re-releasing Lion King in 3D *NM* Aeryn - 06/01/2012 09:45:38 PM 502 Views
I'm a lot older than your five year old, but I'm not sure I disagree Tangled is better. Legolas - 06/01/2012 11:12:32 PM 979 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* Larry - 05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM 1081 Views
Do you really want corporations to be immortal? Vivien - 06/01/2012 12:50:11 AM 982 Views
In a sense, aren't they already? Larry - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM 1072 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* DomA - 06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM 987 Views
It's a thorny issue and I largely agree with you Larry - 06/01/2012 02:50:24 AM 1007 Views
Huh... apparently, Mickey Mouse is already Public Domain anyway ranagrande - 06/01/2012 07:30:36 AM 1158 Views
Can you back that up? Vivien - 06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM 1106 Views
Re: Can you back that up? DomA - 06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM 890 Views
Artist/Singers used to *always* be on tour in order to make a living. Vivien - 06/01/2012 09:34:44 PM 1189 Views
Re: the piracy issues ranagrande - 06/01/2012 06:30:46 AM 1091 Views
Book piracy Vivien - 06/01/2012 05:21:40 PM 1196 Views
corporations have always had rights random thoughts - 06/01/2012 04:08:12 PM 942 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes