Unless you like a lot of old books, or have fairly eclectic tastes, you should be all set.
Aemon Send a noteboard - 01/02/2010 07:11:30 PM
Almost every new book coming out has an ebook version these days. I read a lot of ebooks, and I can't think of anything right off the top of my head that I haven't been able to find. I'm sure there's been something, but there's always some sort of book that I want to read available. You'll never run out of ebooks in your subject of choice, that's for sure, even if you do run across a couple that aren't quite available yet.
In my opinion, there are two main reasons that we haven't seen more widespread adoption of ebooks.
1) Cost of hardware. Ebook readers offer a vastly improved reading experience over a phone, or a laptop, or a pda, or what have you. They really do. Right now, though, they're prohibitively expensive.
2) Ebook formats. I can think of at least 6 popular ebook formats off the top of my head, and they're all supported differently by device makers and ebook stores. You still need some limited technical know-how to make sure that what you're downloading will work on your device. Or some slightly more advanced know-how to convert them to a different format that WILL work.
I really don't think we'll see an explosion in popularity until those two problems are solved. Devices have to be cheap enough for most people, and the average American technophobe must have one-click instant availability. Until that point, though, ebooks will remain a second choice for most people, and I will continue to wallow in my elitism.
In my opinion, there are two main reasons that we haven't seen more widespread adoption of ebooks.
1) Cost of hardware. Ebook readers offer a vastly improved reading experience over a phone, or a laptop, or a pda, or what have you. They really do. Right now, though, they're prohibitively expensive.
2) Ebook formats. I can think of at least 6 popular ebook formats off the top of my head, and they're all supported differently by device makers and ebook stores. You still need some limited technical know-how to make sure that what you're downloading will work on your device. Or some slightly more advanced know-how to convert them to a different format that WILL work.
I really don't think we'll see an explosion in popularity until those two problems are solved. Devices have to be cheap enough for most people, and the average American technophobe must have one-click instant availability. Until that point, though, ebooks will remain a second choice for most people, and I will continue to wallow in my elitism.
Amazon Accepts Macmillan’s Demand for Higher E-Book Prices
- 01/02/2010 04:21:35 PM
1492 Views
Amazon lost me as a customer over all this *NM*
- 01/02/2010 05:52:53 PM
473 Views
Why's that?
- 01/02/2010 06:55:35 PM
1088 Views
I sum it up here
- 01/02/2010 08:42:02 PM
1397 Views
That's an interesting point. And I have an opposite reaction.
- 01/02/2010 08:56:16 PM
902 Views
I like that they are public - I dislike that they affect the public so directly
- 01/02/2010 08:59:41 PM
1125 Views
To each his own. I come away with the opposite reaction and like Amazon even more.
- 01/02/2010 09:35:10 PM
846 Views
I think his complaint is that he feels Amazon is using public opinion to pressure suppliers.
- 01/02/2010 09:04:16 PM
840 Views
It's a good tactic. I would have done the same thing. *NM*
- 01/02/2010 09:36:31 PM
439 Views
Is it though - Amazon's stock is way down today. Seems the tactic failed *NM*
- 01/02/2010 09:53:06 PM
443 Views
Apple stocks have gone down on days after major announcements too.
- 01/02/2010 10:04:04 PM
810 Views
agreed - short term doesn't mean much *NM*
- 01/02/2010 10:08:01 PM
436 Views
Macmillan will lose out when people like myself choose to find the book elsewhere.
- 01/02/2010 06:46:10 PM
819 Views
How easy is it to find books now?
- 01/02/2010 06:53:43 PM
767 Views
Pretty easily, actually.
- 01/02/2010 07:07:11 PM
1236 Views
That's excellent.
- 01/02/2010 08:19:55 PM
1016 Views
Screens are good.
- 01/02/2010 08:50:08 PM
1032 Views
- 01/02/2010 08:50:08 PM
1032 Views
Two words: Leather cover.
- 01/02/2010 08:54:37 PM
888 Views
True, I do remember liking the cover. It's much nicer than what comes with the Sony.
- 01/02/2010 09:02:56 PM
1055 Views
This is what I have. It sounds like what you have for your Sony.
- 01/02/2010 09:39:02 PM
1089 Views
Unless you like a lot of old books, or have fairly eclectic tastes, you should be all set.
- 01/02/2010 07:11:30 PM
1222 Views
$12.99 to $14.99 for a fiction ebook is ridiculous. *NM*
- 01/02/2010 07:44:20 PM
491 Views
Then again, it's half the price of a print version, for essentially the same product / experience.
- 01/02/2010 07:50:29 PM
810 Views
Not really. I buy new hardcover releases at Borders for around 18 to 20.
- 02/02/2010 12:34:08 AM
999 Views
I don't know about that.
- 01/02/2010 08:21:05 PM
911 Views
People pay that sort of money for DVd and more for Blue Ray
- 01/02/2010 08:00:47 PM
881 Views
Physical copy is rather important in that case, you know... at least to me.
- 01/02/2010 08:54:05 PM
1001 Views
Good for MacMillan. I'll cheer on anyone who takes a stab against e-books.
- 02/02/2010 04:00:05 AM
931 Views
Whaaa?
- 02/02/2010 04:08:50 AM
876 Views
Yes, of course.
- 02/02/2010 04:33:13 AM
969 Views
In ten years you'll have an ebook reader.
- 02/02/2010 05:34:57 AM
976 Views
I know. That's the problem. *NM*
- 02/02/2010 12:56:32 PM
427 Views
Oh, hush. Go sit in the corner and listen to your 8-track while the rest of us enjoy The Future.
*NM*
- 02/02/2010 02:37:33 PM
438 Views
*NM*
- 02/02/2010 02:37:33 PM
438 Views
The lower prices, the increased profit, or the ecological benefit? *NM*
- 02/02/2010 05:17:13 PM
366 Views
The gradual loss of physical books. *NM*
- 02/02/2010 05:32:39 PM
377 Views
Mmm. I detect an illogical argument.
- 02/02/2010 05:35:14 PM
796 Views
It will increase the number of books available
- 02/02/2010 01:55:05 PM
2580 Views
One apt analogy is the widespread use of recording tools like Pro Tools.
- 02/02/2010 08:07:22 PM
968 Views
Uh, so what you want to dictate is the medium by which people read? You have no right.
- 02/02/2010 08:01:09 PM
927 Views

Good Lord! *NM*