Active Users:354 Time:16/05/2024 09:44:37 PM
I agree with you. I like what Amazon did. everynametaken Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 12:45:10 AM
They are trying to keep prices down and really break the market open with affordable ebooks that of course can be used on their ereaders in their format. I tend to think that Amazon realizes that people aren't going to go en masse with 12 to 14 dollar ebooks. Not when I (and others) can skip spending the money on an ereader and get the hardcover at Borders for 2 to 4 dollars more.

By "sticking it" to macMillan at least for a short while they have at least brought the issue to the news and the public. Let the people decide, is MacMillan being ridiculous and greedy or is amazon in the wrong. I side with Amazon. Let each man decide for himself.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
Reply to message
Amazon Accepts Macmillan’s Demand for Higher E-Book Prices - 01/02/2010 04:21:35 PM 1272 Views
Amazon lost me as a customer over all this *NM* - 01/02/2010 05:52:53 PM 357 Views
Why's that? - 01/02/2010 06:55:35 PM 894 Views
I sum it up here - 01/02/2010 08:42:02 PM 1155 Views
That's an interesting point. And I have an opposite reaction. - 01/02/2010 08:56:16 PM 742 Views
I like that they are public - I dislike that they affect the public so directly - 01/02/2010 08:59:41 PM 902 Views
To each his own. I come away with the opposite reaction and like Amazon even more. - 01/02/2010 09:35:10 PM 656 Views
I agree with you. I like what Amazon did. - 02/02/2010 12:45:10 AM 796 Views
I think his complaint is that he feels Amazon is using public opinion to pressure suppliers. - 01/02/2010 09:04:16 PM 643 Views
thats a big part of it - 01/02/2010 09:09:15 PM 1000 Views
It's a good tactic. I would have done the same thing. *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:36:31 PM 355 Views
Is it though - Amazon's stock is way down today. Seems the tactic failed *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:53:06 PM 331 Views
Apple stocks have gone down on days after major announcements too. - 01/02/2010 10:04:04 PM 611 Views
agreed - short term doesn't mean much *NM* - 01/02/2010 10:08:01 PM 331 Views
Still, your overall point stands. - 01/02/2010 11:10:25 PM 630 Views
Macmillan will lose out when people like myself choose to find the book elsewhere. - 01/02/2010 06:46:10 PM 631 Views
How easy is it to find books now? - 01/02/2010 06:53:43 PM 579 Views
Pretty easily, actually. - 01/02/2010 07:07:11 PM 997 Views
That's excellent. - 01/02/2010 08:19:55 PM 798 Views
Screens are good. - 01/02/2010 08:50:08 PM 839 Views
Two words: Leather cover. - 01/02/2010 08:54:37 PM 673 Views
Unless you like a lot of old books, or have fairly eclectic tastes, you should be all set. - 01/02/2010 07:11:30 PM 1037 Views
If you do like a lot of old books - 01/02/2010 07:16:20 PM 653 Views
Yep, definitely true. I wasn't thinking quite that old, though. - 01/02/2010 07:24:49 PM 775 Views
$12.99 to $14.99 for a fiction ebook is ridiculous. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:44:20 PM 400 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:46:33 PM 304 Views
Then again, it's half the price of a print version, for essentially the same product / experience. - 01/02/2010 07:50:29 PM 613 Views
That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:24:08 PM 640 Views
Re: That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:55:35 PM 858 Views
Because, as Aemon says, that's how price discrimination works. - 01/02/2010 11:31:14 PM 601 Views
Not really. I buy new hardcover releases at Borders for around 18 to 20. - 02/02/2010 12:34:08 AM 777 Views
I don't know about that. - 01/02/2010 08:21:05 PM 672 Views
not really, i buy brand new paperbacks for 6.99 *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:21:16 AM 299 Views
Mass markets, yeah. - 02/02/2010 12:19:25 PM 640 Views
That is bananas. - 01/02/2010 07:46:28 PM 632 Views
"Most newly released..." - 01/02/2010 07:55:19 PM 860 Views
People pay that sort of money for DVd and more for Blue Ray - 01/02/2010 08:00:47 PM 650 Views
Physical copy is rather important in that case, you know... at least to me. - 01/02/2010 08:54:05 PM 806 Views
I was with you till that last sentence. - 01/02/2010 08:58:58 PM 885 Views
I really don't think it is that different - 01/02/2010 10:01:20 PM 649 Views
If you have issues with eBook pricing, read this link - 01/02/2010 08:46:47 PM 987 Views
He makes good points... - 01/02/2010 11:37:22 PM 641 Views
I am unimpressed by his arguments. - 02/02/2010 01:06:03 AM 648 Views
Good for MacMillan. I'll cheer on anyone who takes a stab against e-books. - 02/02/2010 04:00:05 AM 726 Views
Whaaa? - 02/02/2010 04:08:50 AM 677 Views
Yes, of course. - 02/02/2010 04:33:13 AM 775 Views
In ten years you'll have an ebook reader. - 02/02/2010 05:34:57 AM 800 Views
I know. That's the problem. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:56:32 PM 336 Views
The lower prices, the increased profit, or the ecological benefit? *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:17:13 PM 280 Views
The gradual loss of physical books. *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:32:39 PM 286 Views
Mmm. I detect an illogical argument. - 02/02/2010 05:35:14 PM 581 Views
Obviously they won't disappear completely, or even that fast. - 02/02/2010 11:04:47 PM 629 Views
Why not? It'll spur the growth of used book stores. *NM* - 03/02/2010 01:29:56 AM 276 Views
It will increase the number of books available - 02/02/2010 01:55:05 PM 789 Views
One apt analogy is the widespread use of recording tools like Pro Tools. - 02/02/2010 08:07:22 PM 767 Views
There are already comapnies offering editng services - 02/02/2010 10:30:28 PM 599 Views
Uh, so what you want to dictate is the medium by which people read? You have no right. - 02/02/2010 08:01:09 PM 736 Views
And again let me add that it's not necessarily one or the other. - 02/02/2010 10:09:20 PM 571 Views
That would be awesome. - 02/02/2010 11:02:42 PM 567 Views
Obviously I'm not dictating anything. I'm stating my view. - 02/02/2010 11:01:41 PM 861 Views
Good Lord! *NM* - 02/02/2010 07:58:03 PM 285 Views

Reply to Message