Active Users:479 Time:01/03/2026 03:45:09 AM
I don't know if I'd call it bad, per se. Legolas Send a noteboard - 10/04/2010 11:37:55 AM

I have only seen the first season. It seemed a bit off at times, but it got quite good once it got bast all the orgasms that seemed to be necessary in the first couple of episodes. Is the second season bad?

I mean, it's not as if the acting is worse or the writing is worse or so. It's just that I found it rather depressing as just about every character did horrible things that made it rather hard to have much sympathy for them anymore, but then one might argue that's the reality of a civil war. Vorenus and Pullo get involved with what you might call the Roman underworld, Octavian obviously makes his grasp for power, wars with Mark Antony and pretty much becomes a tyrant. I wasn't too fond of them changing actors for Octavian, either, though I can see why it was necessary - where the first season only covers a number of years, the second goes from 44 BC all the way to 31, it's absurd enough that everybody else doesn't age but Octavian could hardly remain a short teenager like he was in the first season (though it has the odd effect of suddenly making him seem older than Octavia).

As far as things I enjoyed go, there's more of Cleopatra, more of the delightful James Purefoy as Mark Antony, and Livia and Agrippa are pretty cool - the former as essentially an evil scheming bitch, the latter as a simple man trying to do what is right while getting tangled up in Octavian's and Livia's games.
Reply to message
The greatest King in Fantasy - 09/04/2010 05:18:42 AM 2176 Views
King Arthur. Hands down. - 09/04/2010 06:40:15 AM 1578 Views
I would argue with you. - 09/04/2010 06:54:53 AM 1520 Views
That's the point, though. Arthur's humanity is what makes him so admirable. - 09/04/2010 06:59:07 AM 1547 Views
I have to agree with Dannymac - 09/04/2010 02:04:44 PM 1536 Views
But he's not in a modern fantasy novel. - 09/04/2010 07:37:14 PM 1592 Views
when I read the actual book... - 10/04/2010 12:08:21 AM 1556 Views
I'm going with the most likely historical version of King Arthur - 09/04/2010 06:45:26 PM 1623 Views
My money is still on Aragorn - 09/04/2010 12:47:43 PM 1662 Views
Aragorn is so awesome... - 09/04/2010 02:05:42 PM 1508 Views
Arwen's character is just never fleshed out, though. - 09/04/2010 02:18:30 PM 1474 Views
Re: Arwen's character is just never fleshed out, though. - 09/04/2010 02:49:45 PM 1548 Views
Hm - 09/04/2010 03:23:53 PM 1612 Views
Mostly, yes, but there are a few exceptions - Galadriel, Eowyn, and above all Luthien. - 09/04/2010 03:32:00 PM 1484 Views
Re: Mostly, yes, but there are a few exceptions - Galadriel, Eowyn, and above all Luthien. - 09/04/2010 03:45:37 PM 1754 Views
I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 04:34:15 PM 1603 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 04:55:34 PM 1487 Views
If Tacitus and Graves were accurate - 09/04/2010 05:09:20 PM 1616 Views
Re: If Tacitus and Graves were accurate - 09/04/2010 05:26:43 PM 1524 Views
I rather liked her depiction in Rome. - 09/04/2010 05:34:37 PM 1582 Views
Re: I rather liked her depiction in Rome. - 09/04/2010 05:45:06 PM 1657 Views
Re: I rather liked her depiction in Rome. - 10/04/2010 11:14:26 AM 1646 Views
I don't know if I'd call it bad, per se. - 10/04/2010 11:37:55 AM 1781 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 05:02:50 PM 1570 Views
Eh, the other Vala don't do much of anything either. - 09/04/2010 05:31:42 PM 1538 Views
Re: Eh, the other Vala don't do much of anything either. - 09/04/2010 05:44:03 PM 1525 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 05:06:49 PM 1689 Views
I call bullshit - 09/04/2010 08:09:49 PM 1480 Views
Re: I call bullshit - 09/04/2010 08:31:16 PM 1491 Views
Re: I call bullshit - 10/04/2010 08:04:15 AM 1584 Views
I didn't realize it was fashionable to call Tolkien sexist. - 10/04/2010 05:12:07 PM 1592 Views
Re: I didn't realize it was fashionable to call Tolkien sexist. - 12/04/2010 11:00:23 AM 1467 Views
Exactly. - 13/04/2010 03:08:46 AM 1591 Views
Re: Exactly. - 13/04/2010 08:54:01 AM 1673 Views
I was going to say something similar. - 09/04/2010 03:21:45 PM 1510 Views
Re: Aragorn is so awesome... - 09/04/2010 08:00:25 PM 1477 Views
Re: Aragorn is so awesome... - 09/04/2010 08:37:12 PM 1510 Views
He's good, but then he just doesn't have to face so many things. - 09/04/2010 02:22:04 PM 1807 Views
Doesn't have to face many things? - 09/04/2010 07:59:27 PM 1562 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 09/04/2010 08:38:51 PM 1409 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 10/04/2010 08:24:33 AM 1525 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 10/04/2010 05:08:42 PM 1663 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 12/04/2010 10:55:12 AM 1517 Views
He really wasn't a king in majority of the story though - 12/04/2010 05:54:23 PM 1482 Views
I'm sure there are many, but one coming to mind is Prince Josua from Memory, Sorrow and Thorn - 09/04/2010 02:23:57 PM 1507 Views
Oh yeah I liked him a lot *NM* - 09/04/2010 04:09:59 PM 765 Views
Josua Lackhand is a great fantasy King! - 09/04/2010 05:14:39 PM 1562 Views
Arutha was never King. *NM* - 09/04/2010 07:18:30 PM 722 Views
I'm going to go with a tie... - 09/04/2010 04:22:42 PM 1505 Views
Joffrey and the Stag! *NM* - 09/04/2010 09:53:56 PM 735 Views
ROFL *NM* - 09/04/2010 11:39:36 PM 696 Views
Artur Hawkwing - 10/04/2010 03:34:02 AM 1676 Views
??? - 10/04/2010 10:30:13 AM 2095 Views
Simba *NM* - 10/04/2010 08:40:38 AM 785 Views
Manwe - 10/04/2010 10:31:54 AM 1984 Views
Bah. He's hardly a character. *NM* - 12/04/2010 01:07:29 AM 880 Views
Arutha, the Prince of Krondor - 12/04/2010 01:06:14 AM 1585 Views
Westley - 13/04/2010 02:59:36 AM 1549 Views
Leto Atreides II - 13/04/2010 05:07:29 AM 1464 Views
I'll agree with that! *NM* - 13/04/2010 11:33:10 AM 730 Views

Reply to Message