Which just reinforces how awesome AH was - no one else could do what he did
Cannoli Send a noteboard - 13/04/2010 11:50:54 AM
The Diadochi or however you spell them did make a good run at maintaining significant portions of Alexander's empire, and it did not break up nearly as badly as AH's empire. Hawkwing made something from nothing and sustained it for decades with his will and ruling ability. Alexander took daddy's innovative army out to play, conquered a couple of kingdoms (which previous experiences such as the Greco-Persian wars and Anabasis indicated was ripe for the taking anyway), and after he died his successors divided them into a couple of kingdoms that lasted a while. Most of them were swallowed up by Rome or the Parthians eventually. Nothing that large could last without Hawkwing, and no one came as close to him as Ptolemy or Selueccus.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
The greatest King in Fantasy
09/04/2010 05:18:42 AM
- 2045 Views
King Arthur. Hands down.
09/04/2010 06:40:15 AM
- 1432 Views
I would argue with you.
09/04/2010 06:54:53 AM
- 1388 Views
That's the point, though. Arthur's humanity is what makes him so admirable.
09/04/2010 06:59:07 AM
- 1429 Views
I have to agree with Dannymac
09/04/2010 02:04:44 PM
- 1426 Views
But he's not in a modern fantasy novel.
09/04/2010 07:37:14 PM
- 1442 Views

when I read the actual book...
10/04/2010 12:08:21 AM
- 1450 Views
"The actual character"? Which of the countless different ones? *NM*
10/04/2010 12:21:00 AM
- 677 Views
i mean the actual character of Arthur in the actual book.
10/04/2010 12:51:44 AM
- 1546 Views
There isn't an "actual book." Le Morte d'Arthur is a relatively early compilation of legends. *NM*
10/04/2010 03:09:40 AM
- 722 Views
I'm going with the most likely historical version of King Arthur
09/04/2010 06:45:26 PM
- 1476 Views
My money is still on Aragorn
09/04/2010 12:47:43 PM
- 1549 Views
Aragorn is so awesome...
09/04/2010 02:05:42 PM
- 1406 Views
Arwen's character is just never fleshed out, though.
09/04/2010 02:18:30 PM
- 1367 Views
Re: Arwen's character is just never fleshed out, though.
09/04/2010 02:49:45 PM
- 1439 Views
Mostly, yes, but there are a few exceptions - Galadriel, Eowyn, and above all Luthien.
09/04/2010 03:32:00 PM
- 1371 Views
Re: Mostly, yes, but there are a few exceptions - Galadriel, Eowyn, and above all Luthien.
09/04/2010 03:45:37 PM
- 1636 Views
I can't agree about the goddesses.
09/04/2010 04:34:15 PM
- 1484 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses.
09/04/2010 04:55:34 PM
- 1374 Views
If Tacitus and Graves were accurate
09/04/2010 05:09:20 PM
- 1465 Views
Re: If Tacitus and Graves were accurate
09/04/2010 05:26:43 PM
- 1389 Views
I rather liked her depiction in Rome.
09/04/2010 05:34:37 PM
- 1478 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses.
09/04/2010 05:02:50 PM
- 1424 Views
Nienna, the Valier of Mercy, was single and a wanderer. She's not the most powerful, but...
09/04/2010 06:55:23 PM
- 1440 Views
Re: Nienna, the Valier of Mercy, was single and a wanderer. She's not the most powerful, but...
09/04/2010 07:04:37 PM
- 1453 Views
thought of a better example: Arien the Maia of the Sun was single and far more powerful than Tilion
09/04/2010 09:17:34 PM
- 1678 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses.
09/04/2010 05:06:49 PM
- 1538 Views
That was my first assumption too, but evidently not. *NM*
09/04/2010 05:22:39 PM
- 662 Views
I changed it to Livia Augusta
Sheesh, you people-- a guy mistypes one time!! *NM*
09/04/2010 05:29:03 PM
- 727 Views

I call bullshit
09/04/2010 08:09:49 PM
- 1365 Views
Re: I call bullshit
09/04/2010 08:31:16 PM
- 1404 Views
Re: I call bullshit
10/04/2010 08:04:15 AM
- 1479 Views
I didn't realize it was fashionable to call Tolkien sexist.
10/04/2010 05:12:07 PM
- 1475 Views
He's good, but then he just doesn't have to face so many things.
09/04/2010 02:22:04 PM
- 1693 Views
Doesn't have to face many things?
09/04/2010 07:59:27 PM
- 1437 Views
As in, there are many important aspects of being king he doesn't have to face.
09/04/2010 08:07:16 PM
- 1431 Views
well technically speaking he WAS the king when he did all those things.
10/04/2010 12:15:26 AM
- 1431 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things?
09/04/2010 08:38:51 PM
- 1290 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things?
10/04/2010 08:24:33 AM
- 1383 Views
I'm sure there are many, but one coming to mind is Prince Josua from Memory, Sorrow and Thorn
09/04/2010 02:23:57 PM
- 1395 Views
I'm going to go with a tie...
09/04/2010 04:22:42 PM
- 1407 Views
Rohan was a whiny hypocritical bitch who failed at the only real test of rulership he ever faced.
10/04/2010 02:51:34 AM
- 1454 Views
Artur Hawkwing
10/04/2010 03:34:02 AM
- 1558 Views
Alexander the Great?
*NM*
10/04/2010 05:08:25 AM
- 692 Views

AH conquered more, did better, & was not a huge d-bag. Alex would have commissioned that big statue *NM*
12/04/2010 03:00:39 PM
- 674 Views
And both managed to have their so-called "empires" crumble within a year of their death. *NM*
12/04/2010 06:12:20 PM
- 682 Views
Which just reinforces how awesome AH was - no one else could do what he did
13/04/2010 11:50:54 AM
- 1484 Views
???
10/04/2010 10:30:13 AM
- 1964 Views
Ta'veren is not a power, it is an accomodation with what the Pattern demands of certain people
12/04/2010 02:56:57 PM
- 1378 Views
What's the name of the Lemur-thing that's the King in "the penguins of madagascar"? He gets my vote! *NM*
14/04/2010 04:46:42 AM
- 728 Views