Active Users:1476 Time:14/06/2026 12:17:39 PM
I don't know if I'd call it bad, per se. Legolas Send a noteboard - 10/04/2010 11:37:55 AM

I have only seen the first season. It seemed a bit off at times, but it got quite good once it got bast all the orgasms that seemed to be necessary in the first couple of episodes. Is the second season bad?

I mean, it's not as if the acting is worse or the writing is worse or so. It's just that I found it rather depressing as just about every character did horrible things that made it rather hard to have much sympathy for them anymore, but then one might argue that's the reality of a civil war. Vorenus and Pullo get involved with what you might call the Roman underworld, Octavian obviously makes his grasp for power, wars with Mark Antony and pretty much becomes a tyrant. I wasn't too fond of them changing actors for Octavian, either, though I can see why it was necessary - where the first season only covers a number of years, the second goes from 44 BC all the way to 31, it's absurd enough that everybody else doesn't age but Octavian could hardly remain a short teenager like he was in the first season (though it has the odd effect of suddenly making him seem older than Octavia).

As far as things I enjoyed go, there's more of Cleopatra, more of the delightful James Purefoy as Mark Antony, and Livia and Agrippa are pretty cool - the former as essentially an evil scheming bitch, the latter as a simple man trying to do what is right while getting tangled up in Octavian's and Livia's games.
Reply to message
The greatest King in Fantasy - 09/04/2010 05:18:42 AM 2232 Views
King Arthur. Hands down. - 09/04/2010 06:40:15 AM 1628 Views
I would argue with you. - 09/04/2010 06:54:53 AM 1573 Views
That's the point, though. Arthur's humanity is what makes him so admirable. - 09/04/2010 06:59:07 AM 1616 Views
I have to agree with Dannymac - 09/04/2010 02:04:44 PM 1587 Views
But he's not in a modern fantasy novel. - 09/04/2010 07:37:14 PM 1662 Views
when I read the actual book... - 10/04/2010 12:08:21 AM 1609 Views
I'm going with the most likely historical version of King Arthur - 09/04/2010 06:45:26 PM 1669 Views
My money is still on Aragorn - 09/04/2010 12:47:43 PM 1708 Views
Aragorn is so awesome... - 09/04/2010 02:05:42 PM 1557 Views
Arwen's character is just never fleshed out, though. - 09/04/2010 02:18:30 PM 1529 Views
Re: Arwen's character is just never fleshed out, though. - 09/04/2010 02:49:45 PM 1594 Views
Hm - 09/04/2010 03:23:53 PM 1662 Views
Mostly, yes, but there are a few exceptions - Galadriel, Eowyn, and above all Luthien. - 09/04/2010 03:32:00 PM 1536 Views
Re: Mostly, yes, but there are a few exceptions - Galadriel, Eowyn, and above all Luthien. - 09/04/2010 03:45:37 PM 1812 Views
I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 04:34:15 PM 1645 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 04:55:34 PM 1532 Views
If Tacitus and Graves were accurate - 09/04/2010 05:09:20 PM 1665 Views
Re: If Tacitus and Graves were accurate - 09/04/2010 05:26:43 PM 1564 Views
I rather liked her depiction in Rome. - 09/04/2010 05:34:37 PM 1637 Views
Re: I rather liked her depiction in Rome. - 09/04/2010 05:45:06 PM 1702 Views
Re: I rather liked her depiction in Rome. - 10/04/2010 11:14:26 AM 1695 Views
I don't know if I'd call it bad, per se. - 10/04/2010 11:37:55 AM 1829 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 05:02:50 PM 1621 Views
Eh, the other Vala don't do much of anything either. - 09/04/2010 05:31:42 PM 1585 Views
Re: Eh, the other Vala don't do much of anything either. - 09/04/2010 05:44:03 PM 1586 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 05:06:49 PM 1735 Views
I call bullshit - 09/04/2010 08:09:49 PM 1535 Views
Re: I call bullshit - 09/04/2010 08:31:16 PM 1541 Views
Re: I call bullshit - 10/04/2010 08:04:15 AM 1634 Views
I didn't realize it was fashionable to call Tolkien sexist. - 10/04/2010 05:12:07 PM 1635 Views
Re: I didn't realize it was fashionable to call Tolkien sexist. - 12/04/2010 11:00:23 AM 1506 Views
Exactly. - 13/04/2010 03:08:46 AM 1647 Views
Re: Exactly. - 13/04/2010 08:54:01 AM 1724 Views
I was going to say something similar. - 09/04/2010 03:21:45 PM 1561 Views
Re: Aragorn is so awesome... - 09/04/2010 08:00:25 PM 1528 Views
Re: Aragorn is so awesome... - 09/04/2010 08:37:12 PM 1570 Views
He's good, but then he just doesn't have to face so many things. - 09/04/2010 02:22:04 PM 1858 Views
Doesn't have to face many things? - 09/04/2010 07:59:27 PM 1610 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 09/04/2010 08:38:51 PM 1458 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 10/04/2010 08:24:33 AM 1591 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 10/04/2010 05:08:42 PM 1713 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 12/04/2010 10:55:12 AM 1571 Views
He really wasn't a king in majority of the story though - 12/04/2010 05:54:23 PM 1532 Views
I'm sure there are many, but one coming to mind is Prince Josua from Memory, Sorrow and Thorn - 09/04/2010 02:23:57 PM 1559 Views
Oh yeah I liked him a lot *NM* - 09/04/2010 04:09:59 PM 788 Views
Josua Lackhand is a great fantasy King! - 09/04/2010 05:14:39 PM 1613 Views
Arutha was never King. *NM* - 09/04/2010 07:18:30 PM 749 Views
I'm going to go with a tie... - 09/04/2010 04:22:42 PM 1559 Views
Joffrey and the Stag! *NM* - 09/04/2010 09:53:56 PM 758 Views
ROFL *NM* - 09/04/2010 11:39:36 PM 725 Views
Artur Hawkwing - 10/04/2010 03:34:02 AM 1729 Views
??? - 10/04/2010 10:30:13 AM 2155 Views
Simba *NM* - 10/04/2010 08:40:38 AM 821 Views
Manwe - 10/04/2010 10:31:54 AM 2042 Views
Bah. He's hardly a character. *NM* - 12/04/2010 01:07:29 AM 913 Views
Arutha, the Prince of Krondor - 12/04/2010 01:06:14 AM 1633 Views
Westley - 13/04/2010 02:59:36 AM 1607 Views
Leto Atreides II - 13/04/2010 05:07:29 AM 1516 Views
I'll agree with that! *NM* - 13/04/2010 11:33:10 AM 757 Views

Reply to Message