A lot.
Tim tells me that it has another origin, though. I thought it derived from a lack of understanding of basic grammar (i.e. a confusion of subject and object), but he said it is due to a Latin rule of some sort.
Tim tells me that it has another origin, though. I thought it derived from a lack of understanding of basic grammar (i.e. a confusion of subject and object), but he said it is due to a Latin rule of some sort.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Inspired by Camilla's post: quit saying "between you and I" already
20/05/2010 04:16:29 PM
- 1011 Views
It isn't something I can recall really noticing
20/05/2010 04:22:42 PM
- 223 Views
You don't live in the United States of America.
20/05/2010 04:31:23 PM
- 199 Views
Well yes but me was just feeling smug it doesn't seem as common over here
20/05/2010 05:12:41 PM
- 180 Views
I think this is one of those things people do because they think it makes them sound smart.
20/05/2010 04:33:38 PM
- 234 Views
When in actuality it exposese their stupidity and ignorance. *NM*
20/05/2010 04:36:08 PM
- 116 Views
Like saying "octopi". <Shivers> *NM*
20/05/2010 11:56:27 PM
- 214 Views
Octopodes makes them sounds like aliens
21/05/2010 12:25:14 AM
- 314 Views
THEY ARE VICIOUS CREATURES FROM THE DEEP. CUTTLEFISH HAVE W SHAPED PUPILS. *NM*
21/05/2010 07:00:41 AM
- 209 Views
Actually nothing like that
21/05/2010 04:49:43 PM
- 174 Views
As a Classicist I'm afraid I can't get past the misguided origins. *NM*
21/05/2010 10:08:34 PM
- 213 Views
I don't know how me feels about this.
20/05/2010 04:49:03 PM
- 224 Views
you know, considering my state was THE lowest in the country for education...
20/05/2010 05:04:42 PM
- 229 Views
That annoys me, too
20/05/2010 05:34:30 PM
- 343 Views
I think you're confusing it with phrase-final prepositions. *NM*
20/05/2010 11:57:30 PM
- 207 Views
No
21/05/2010 12:00:02 AM
- 172 Views
Oh right, that two (pro)nouns linked by "and" have to be the same case.
21/05/2010 12:03:59 AM
- 397 Views
Re: Oh right, that two (pro)nouns linked by "and" have to be the same case.
21/05/2010 12:06:51 AM
- 414 Views
Er, no...
21/05/2010 12:19:31 AM
- 173 Views
Re: Er, no...
21/05/2010 12:22:32 AM
- 180 Views
It doesn't. The reason for that is exactly as Tom says: idiotic teachers. *NM*
21/05/2010 12:28:12 AM
- 200 Views
But that is what I said when you contradicted me! *NM*
21/05/2010 12:38:11 AM
- 211 Views
OK, I'm officially lost.
21/05/2010 12:44:28 AM
- 204 Views
Re: OK, I'm officially lost.
21/05/2010 12:49:59 AM
- 375 Views
Can you start right from the beginning?
21/05/2010 12:52:08 AM
- 185 Views
Re: Can you start right from the beginning?
21/05/2010 12:55:34 AM
- 182 Views
Coffee time is going to be appropriated by grammar discussion? Shall I bring a book? *NM*
21/05/2010 10:12:48 AM
- 204 Views
Not entirely. We just need to get a hold of Pratchett's Unseen Academicals on the way.
21/05/2010 11:25:57 AM
- 160 Views
This whole thread is just an elaborate effort to provoke my complaints about terminal prepositions.
21/05/2010 02:58:05 PM
- 307 Views
Re: Inspired by Camilla's post: quit saying "between you and I" already
20/05/2010 07:28:16 PM
- 295 Views
It doesn't annoy me, but I do fine myself silently correcting it when I hear it.
20/05/2010 07:44:49 PM
- 193 Views
It's the same as "I" vs. "me". "Who" can only be a subject. "Whom" is correct everywhere else.
20/05/2010 07:47:21 PM
- 398 Views
Well, shucks, Tom, we just ain't no good at that there grammer stuff.
20/05/2010 07:49:18 PM
- 209 Views
Not limited to the US of A.
20/05/2010 08:26:30 PM
- 379 Views
It's properly the "US and A" - if Borat taught me nothing else, it's that.
20/05/2010 08:46:18 PM
- 179 Views
If you're going to start down that path...
20/05/2010 10:12:24 PM
- 199 Views
<Winces at your use of the word "ungrammatical"> *NM*
21/05/2010 12:09:29 AM
- 223 Views
I take it the wincing is at the concept, and not at the word itself...
21/05/2010 12:32:43 AM
- 383 Views
It's the misappropriation of linguistic terminology to an improper use.
21/05/2010 12:44:54 AM
- 427 Views
I note you haven't replied to the main thread yet...
21/05/2010 01:12:05 AM
- 291 Views
Well of course that's wrong. It ought to be "The man whom you said that was coming." *NM*
21/05/2010 07:03:37 AM
- 83 Views
OK, I know you're kidding around, but I can't tell if you know it isn't even prescriptively correct.
21/05/2010 10:38:51 AM
- 166 Views
I can't draw you a syntax tree or what have you to prove that it's wrong, no, but I know it is.
22/05/2010 02:56:52 AM
- 165 Views
No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly.
22/05/2010 10:04:34 AM
- 351 Views
Clever clever. Explains why Greek changes the case in its indirect statements so much. *NM*
22/05/2010 09:47:26 PM
- 87 Views
Example please? *NM*
22/05/2010 10:34:05 PM
- 213 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly.
22/05/2010 11:40:05 PM
- 281 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly.
23/05/2010 10:30:59 AM
- 175 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly.
23/05/2010 10:36:25 AM
- 285 Views
Cf pretty much every other European language, no?
23/05/2010 09:32:33 PM
- 153 Views
Yes, but when you're a native speaker of English it comes as something of a surprise.
23/05/2010 11:18:45 PM
- 162 Views
The thing is that you really have to know Old English to figure it out.
24/05/2010 03:22:10 AM
- 164 Views
Actually, that would be a direct object
21/05/2010 01:11:42 AM
- 171 Views
*blinks* Now I'm confused.
21/05/2010 01:21:51 AM
- 163 Views
I know it's odd, but in terse responses, it seems to be a direct object rather than nominative
21/05/2010 01:46:10 AM
- 163 Views
No it isn't...in that case it would be "me", and not "a cookie", that is wanted.
21/05/2010 04:28:55 AM
- 167 Views
Well...
21/05/2010 04:33:27 AM
- 362 Views
"I want me a cookie" is not proper English.
21/05/2010 04:38:20 AM
- 357 Views
I know that
21/05/2010 05:31:52 AM
- 283 Views
See, this is an area where your dialect argument would make sense.
21/05/2010 11:53:17 AM
- 282 Views
But that doesn't actually make any sense in Latin.
22/05/2010 03:03:28 AM
- 171 Views
I know it's dative in Latin
22/05/2010 03:14:48 AM
- 364 Views
Well, yes. But prepositions are how we decline our pronouns in English.
22/05/2010 04:35:42 AM
- 152 Views
And you would be wrong in that.
22/05/2010 02:27:16 PM
- 169 Views
Iċ am not sure what þū said me is relevant these days...
22/05/2010 09:57:41 PM
- 153 Views
You still just aren't getting this.
23/05/2010 12:52:31 AM
- 152 Views
I accept it. But not in the circumstances when the prepositional phrase "to/for me" is used. *NM*
23/05/2010 02:27:30 AM
- 86 Views
You're confusing me almost as much as Larry.
22/05/2010 11:15:43 AM
- 353 Views
True. But English uses the reflexive in that scenario, not the personal pronoun.
22/05/2010 10:05:30 PM
- 187 Views
That was atrocious Latin.
22/05/2010 02:20:35 PM
- 357 Views
I was very drunk, and it wasn't that bad even had I been sober.
22/05/2010 10:04:12 PM
- 290 Views
Parare means, first and foremost, to prepare, supply or make something available.
23/05/2010 12:50:22 AM
- 295 Views
It also means to buy, and it frequently has that meaning when it's with the dative. No dice.
23/05/2010 02:31:01 AM
- 304 Views
Now you're pulling things out of your ass (about parare, at least)
23/05/2010 02:32:58 AM
- 158 Views
I unfortunately don't have the OLD, and no, I'm not.
23/05/2010 02:41:22 AM
- 193 Views
So I looked up the word in Lewis & Short.
23/05/2010 02:49:19 AM
- 167 Views
Interestingly enough, the Oxford Latin Dictionary doesn't have one use of the dative for "to buy".
23/05/2010 02:51:54 PM
- 364 Views
When asked who told him that killing was wrong, Johnny Five said "I told me."
21/05/2010 09:52:15 PM
- 174 Views
One additional thought.
22/05/2010 02:14:15 AM
- 303 Views
in my elementary school grammar classes...
21/05/2010 04:44:50 AM
- 200 Views
You clearly had an unusually good teacher. That's exactly what should be taught.
21/05/2010 12:00:58 PM
- 175 Views
Seriously dudes? 70 posts about fricking grammar?!
21/05/2010 06:46:58 PM
- 187 Views
I'm proud of us all. If it were about Akkadian grammar, I'd be even more proud. *NM*
21/05/2010 06:51:20 PM
- 189 Views
You could make it about Russian grammar
21/05/2010 07:05:35 PM
- 288 Views
I think I would only get slightly more interest than if it were Akkadian grammar.
21/05/2010 08:13:24 PM
- 303 Views
True
21/05/2010 08:45:54 PM
- 155 Views
Ah, you misunderstood my question.
21/05/2010 09:10:56 PM
- 366 Views
I guess I did
21/05/2010 09:25:53 PM
- 424 Views