It's the same as "I" vs. "me". "Who" can only be a subject. "Whom" is correct everywhere else.
Tom Send a noteboard - 20/05/2010 07:47:21 PM
Of course, be careful when it's used as the beginning of a relative clause, because it's functioning as the subject of that clause but that clause, relative to the rest of the sentence, isn't the subject.
Example:
I don't like people who misuse the subjunctive.
In this case "who" is modifying the object of the sentence, but it is the subject of the clause.
Example:
I don't like people who misuse the subjunctive.
In this case "who" is modifying the object of the sentence, but it is the subject of the clause.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
Inspired by Camilla's post: quit saying "between you and I" already
20/05/2010 04:16:29 PM
- 1070 Views
It isn't something I can recall really noticing
20/05/2010 04:22:42 PM
- 278 Views
You don't live in the United States of America.
20/05/2010 04:31:23 PM
- 252 Views

Well yes but me was just feeling smug it doesn't seem as common over here
20/05/2010 05:12:41 PM
- 238 Views

I think this is one of those things people do because they think it makes them sound smart.
20/05/2010 04:33:38 PM
- 296 Views
When in actuality it exposese their stupidity and ignorance. *NM*
20/05/2010 04:36:08 PM
- 142 Views
Like saying "octopi". <Shivers> *NM*
20/05/2010 11:56:27 PM
- 243 Views
Octopodes makes them sounds like aliens
21/05/2010 12:25:14 AM
- 371 Views

THEY ARE VICIOUS CREATURES FROM THE DEEP. CUTTLEFISH HAVE W SHAPED PUPILS. *NM*
21/05/2010 07:00:41 AM
- 237 Views
Actually nothing like that
21/05/2010 04:49:43 PM
- 228 Views
As a Classicist I'm afraid I can't get past the misguided origins. *NM*
21/05/2010 10:08:34 PM
- 239 Views
I don't know how me feels about this.
20/05/2010 04:49:03 PM
- 280 Views
you know, considering my state was THE lowest in the country for education...
20/05/2010 05:04:42 PM
- 285 Views
That annoys me, too
20/05/2010 05:34:30 PM
- 407 Views
I think you're confusing it with phrase-final prepositions. *NM*
20/05/2010 11:57:30 PM
- 243 Views
No
21/05/2010 12:00:02 AM
- 228 Views
Oh right, that two (pro)nouns linked by "and" have to be the same case.
21/05/2010 12:03:59 AM
- 461 Views
Re: Oh right, that two (pro)nouns linked by "and" have to be the same case.
21/05/2010 12:06:51 AM
- 469 Views
Er, no...
21/05/2010 12:19:31 AM
- 226 Views
Re: Er, no...
21/05/2010 12:22:32 AM
- 245 Views
It doesn't. The reason for that is exactly as Tom says: idiotic teachers. *NM*
21/05/2010 12:28:12 AM
- 226 Views
But that is what I said when you contradicted me! *NM*
21/05/2010 12:38:11 AM
- 234 Views
OK, I'm officially lost.
21/05/2010 12:44:28 AM
- 265 Views
Re: OK, I'm officially lost.
21/05/2010 12:49:59 AM
- 449 Views
Can you start right from the beginning?
21/05/2010 12:52:08 AM
- 242 Views
Re: Can you start right from the beginning?
21/05/2010 12:55:34 AM
- 249 Views
Coffee time is going to be appropriated by grammar discussion? Shall I bring a book?
*NM*
21/05/2010 10:12:48 AM
- 227 Views

Not entirely. We just need to get a hold of Pratchett's Unseen Academicals on the way.
21/05/2010 11:25:57 AM
- 216 Views
This whole thread is just an elaborate effort to provoke my complaints about terminal prepositions.
21/05/2010 02:58:05 PM
- 370 Views
Re: Inspired by Camilla's post: quit saying "between you and I" already
20/05/2010 07:28:16 PM
- 347 Views
It doesn't annoy me, but I do fine myself silently correcting it when I hear it.
20/05/2010 07:44:49 PM
- 275 Views
It's the same as "I" vs. "me". "Who" can only be a subject. "Whom" is correct everywhere else.
20/05/2010 07:47:21 PM
- 469 Views
Well, shucks, Tom, we just ain't no good at that there grammer stuff.
20/05/2010 07:49:18 PM
- 260 Views
Not limited to the US of A.
20/05/2010 08:26:30 PM
- 436 Views
It's properly the "US and A" - if Borat taught me nothing else, it's that.
20/05/2010 08:46:18 PM
- 240 Views
If you're going to start down that path...
20/05/2010 10:12:24 PM
- 258 Views

<Winces at your use of the word "ungrammatical"> *NM*
21/05/2010 12:09:29 AM
- 250 Views
I take it the wincing is at the concept, and not at the word itself...
21/05/2010 12:32:43 AM
- 447 Views

It's the misappropriation of linguistic terminology to an improper use.
21/05/2010 12:44:54 AM
- 482 Views
I note you haven't replied to the main thread yet...
21/05/2010 01:12:05 AM
- 346 Views
Well of course that's wrong. It ought to be "The man whom you said that was coming."
*NM*
21/05/2010 07:03:37 AM
- 104 Views

OK, I know you're kidding around, but I can't tell if you know it isn't even prescriptively correct.
21/05/2010 10:38:51 AM
- 227 Views
I can't draw you a syntax tree or what have you to prove that it's wrong, no, but I know it is.
22/05/2010 02:56:52 AM
- 215 Views

No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly.
22/05/2010 10:04:34 AM
- 406 Views
Clever clever. Explains why Greek changes the case in its indirect statements so much. *NM*
22/05/2010 09:47:26 PM
- 109 Views
Example please? *NM*
22/05/2010 10:34:05 PM
- 240 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly.
22/05/2010 11:40:05 PM
- 330 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly.
23/05/2010 10:30:59 AM
- 245 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly.
23/05/2010 10:36:25 AM
- 335 Views
Cf pretty much every other European language, no?
23/05/2010 09:32:33 PM
- 224 Views

Yes, but when you're a native speaker of English it comes as something of a surprise.
23/05/2010 11:18:45 PM
- 212 Views
The thing is that you really have to know Old English to figure it out.
24/05/2010 03:22:10 AM
- 229 Views
Actually, that would be a direct object
21/05/2010 01:11:42 AM
- 225 Views
*blinks* Now I'm confused.
21/05/2010 01:21:51 AM
- 211 Views
I know it's odd, but in terse responses, it seems to be a direct object rather than nominative
21/05/2010 01:46:10 AM
- 221 Views
No it isn't...in that case it would be "me", and not "a cookie", that is wanted.
21/05/2010 04:28:55 AM
- 234 Views
Well...
21/05/2010 04:33:27 AM
- 410 Views
"I want me a cookie" is not proper English.
21/05/2010 04:38:20 AM
- 415 Views
I know that
21/05/2010 05:31:52 AM
- 341 Views
See, this is an area where your dialect argument would make sense.
21/05/2010 11:53:17 AM
- 332 Views
But that doesn't actually make any sense in Latin.
22/05/2010 03:03:28 AM
- 235 Views

I know it's dative in Latin
22/05/2010 03:14:48 AM
- 421 Views
Well, yes. But prepositions are how we decline our pronouns in English.
22/05/2010 04:35:42 AM
- 207 Views

And you would be wrong in that.
22/05/2010 02:27:16 PM
- 226 Views
Iċ am not sure what þū said me is relevant these days...
22/05/2010 09:57:41 PM
- 203 Views
You still just aren't getting this.
23/05/2010 12:52:31 AM
- 214 Views
I accept it. But not in the circumstances when the prepositional phrase "to/for me" is used.
*NM*
23/05/2010 02:27:30 AM
- 107 Views

You're confusing me almost as much as Larry.
22/05/2010 11:15:43 AM
- 407 Views

True. But English uses the reflexive in that scenario, not the personal pronoun.
22/05/2010 10:05:30 PM
- 243 Views
That was atrocious Latin.
22/05/2010 02:20:35 PM
- 440 Views
I was very drunk, and it wasn't that bad even had I been sober.
22/05/2010 10:04:12 PM
- 338 Views
Parare means, first and foremost, to prepare, supply or make something available.
23/05/2010 12:50:22 AM
- 340 Views
It also means to buy, and it frequently has that meaning when it's with the dative. No dice.
23/05/2010 02:31:01 AM
- 415 Views
Now you're pulling things out of your ass (about parare, at least)
23/05/2010 02:32:58 AM
- 218 Views
I unfortunately don't have the OLD, and no, I'm not.
23/05/2010 02:41:22 AM
- 254 Views

So I looked up the word in Lewis & Short.
23/05/2010 02:49:19 AM
- 216 Views
Interestingly enough, the Oxford Latin Dictionary doesn't have one use of the dative for "to buy".
23/05/2010 02:51:54 PM
- 427 Views
When asked who told him that killing was wrong, Johnny Five said "I told me."
21/05/2010 09:52:15 PM
- 234 Views
One additional thought.
22/05/2010 02:14:15 AM
- 360 Views
in my elementary school grammar classes...
21/05/2010 04:44:50 AM
- 264 Views
You clearly had an unusually good teacher. That's exactly what should be taught.
21/05/2010 12:00:58 PM
- 233 Views
Seriously dudes? 70 posts about fricking grammar?!
21/05/2010 06:46:58 PM
- 247 Views
I'm proud of us all. If it were about Akkadian grammar, I'd be even more proud. *NM*
21/05/2010 06:51:20 PM
- 213 Views
You could make it about Russian grammar
21/05/2010 07:05:35 PM
- 352 Views
I think I would only get slightly more interest than if it were Akkadian grammar.
21/05/2010 08:13:24 PM
- 353 Views
True
21/05/2010 08:45:54 PM
- 217 Views
Ah, you misunderstood my question.
21/05/2010 09:10:56 PM
- 425 Views
I guess I did
21/05/2010 09:25:53 PM
- 482 Views
