Who wants a cookie?
I want a cookie.
"I" is the subject. Shit, man, I said I is the subject. 'Sup?
I want a cookie.
"I" is the subject. Shit, man, I said I is the subject. 'Sup?
OK, indirect. I want (me) a cookie. Who? Not I. Me.
I realized my mistake after the fact and just ended up shrugging in my second response and just noting that it's just one of those exceptions now, so ingrained that it's viewed as being acceptable speech.
Me? I don't know for sure...

Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.

Inspired by Camilla's post: quit saying "between you and I" already
20/05/2010 04:16:29 PM
- 1067 Views
It isn't something I can recall really noticing
20/05/2010 04:22:42 PM
- 275 Views
You don't live in the United States of America.
20/05/2010 04:31:23 PM
- 250 Views

Well yes but me was just feeling smug it doesn't seem as common over here
20/05/2010 05:12:41 PM
- 235 Views

I think this is one of those things people do because they think it makes them sound smart.
20/05/2010 04:33:38 PM
- 293 Views
When in actuality it exposese their stupidity and ignorance. *NM*
20/05/2010 04:36:08 PM
- 141 Views
Like saying "octopi". <Shivers> *NM*
20/05/2010 11:56:27 PM
- 242 Views
Octopodes makes them sounds like aliens
21/05/2010 12:25:14 AM
- 368 Views

THEY ARE VICIOUS CREATURES FROM THE DEEP. CUTTLEFISH HAVE W SHAPED PUPILS. *NM*
21/05/2010 07:00:41 AM
- 236 Views
Actually nothing like that
21/05/2010 04:49:43 PM
- 225 Views
As a Classicist I'm afraid I can't get past the misguided origins. *NM*
21/05/2010 10:08:34 PM
- 238 Views
I don't know how me feels about this.
20/05/2010 04:49:03 PM
- 278 Views
you know, considering my state was THE lowest in the country for education...
20/05/2010 05:04:42 PM
- 282 Views
That annoys me, too
20/05/2010 05:34:30 PM
- 404 Views
I think you're confusing it with phrase-final prepositions. *NM*
20/05/2010 11:57:30 PM
- 242 Views
No
21/05/2010 12:00:02 AM
- 226 Views
Oh right, that two (pro)nouns linked by "and" have to be the same case.
21/05/2010 12:03:59 AM
- 458 Views
Re: Oh right, that two (pro)nouns linked by "and" have to be the same case.
21/05/2010 12:06:51 AM
- 466 Views
Er, no...
21/05/2010 12:19:31 AM
- 223 Views
Re: Er, no...
21/05/2010 12:22:32 AM
- 242 Views
It doesn't. The reason for that is exactly as Tom says: idiotic teachers. *NM*
21/05/2010 12:28:12 AM
- 225 Views
But that is what I said when you contradicted me! *NM*
21/05/2010 12:38:11 AM
- 233 Views
OK, I'm officially lost.
21/05/2010 12:44:28 AM
- 263 Views
Re: OK, I'm officially lost.
21/05/2010 12:49:59 AM
- 445 Views
Can you start right from the beginning?
21/05/2010 12:52:08 AM
- 240 Views
Re: Can you start right from the beginning?
21/05/2010 12:55:34 AM
- 247 Views
Coffee time is going to be appropriated by grammar discussion? Shall I bring a book?
*NM*
21/05/2010 10:12:48 AM
- 226 Views

Not entirely. We just need to get a hold of Pratchett's Unseen Academicals on the way.
21/05/2010 11:25:57 AM
- 213 Views
This whole thread is just an elaborate effort to provoke my complaints about terminal prepositions.
21/05/2010 02:58:05 PM
- 367 Views
Re: Inspired by Camilla's post: quit saying "between you and I" already
20/05/2010 07:28:16 PM
- 344 Views
It doesn't annoy me, but I do fine myself silently correcting it when I hear it.
20/05/2010 07:44:49 PM
- 272 Views
It's the same as "I" vs. "me". "Who" can only be a subject. "Whom" is correct everywhere else.
20/05/2010 07:47:21 PM
- 466 Views
Well, shucks, Tom, we just ain't no good at that there grammer stuff.
20/05/2010 07:49:18 PM
- 257 Views
Not limited to the US of A.
20/05/2010 08:26:30 PM
- 434 Views
It's properly the "US and A" - if Borat taught me nothing else, it's that.
20/05/2010 08:46:18 PM
- 237 Views
If you're going to start down that path...
20/05/2010 10:12:24 PM
- 255 Views

<Winces at your use of the word "ungrammatical"> *NM*
21/05/2010 12:09:29 AM
- 249 Views
I take it the wincing is at the concept, and not at the word itself...
21/05/2010 12:32:43 AM
- 444 Views

It's the misappropriation of linguistic terminology to an improper use.
21/05/2010 12:44:54 AM
- 479 Views
I note you haven't replied to the main thread yet...
21/05/2010 01:12:05 AM
- 343 Views
Well of course that's wrong. It ought to be "The man whom you said that was coming."
*NM*
21/05/2010 07:03:37 AM
- 103 Views

OK, I know you're kidding around, but I can't tell if you know it isn't even prescriptively correct.
21/05/2010 10:38:51 AM
- 224 Views
I can't draw you a syntax tree or what have you to prove that it's wrong, no, but I know it is.
22/05/2010 02:56:52 AM
- 212 Views

No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly.
22/05/2010 10:04:34 AM
- 403 Views
Clever clever. Explains why Greek changes the case in its indirect statements so much. *NM*
22/05/2010 09:47:26 PM
- 108 Views
Example please? *NM*
22/05/2010 10:34:05 PM
- 239 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly.
22/05/2010 11:40:05 PM
- 327 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly.
23/05/2010 10:30:59 AM
- 242 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly.
23/05/2010 10:36:25 AM
- 332 Views
Cf pretty much every other European language, no?
23/05/2010 09:32:33 PM
- 221 Views

Yes, but when you're a native speaker of English it comes as something of a surprise.
23/05/2010 11:18:45 PM
- 209 Views
The thing is that you really have to know Old English to figure it out.
24/05/2010 03:22:10 AM
- 226 Views
Actually, that would be a direct object
21/05/2010 01:11:42 AM
- 222 Views
*blinks* Now I'm confused.
21/05/2010 01:21:51 AM
- 208 Views
I know it's odd, but in terse responses, it seems to be a direct object rather than nominative
21/05/2010 01:46:10 AM
- 218 Views
No it isn't...in that case it would be "me", and not "a cookie", that is wanted.
21/05/2010 04:28:55 AM
- 231 Views
Well...
21/05/2010 04:33:27 AM
- 408 Views
"I want me a cookie" is not proper English.
21/05/2010 04:38:20 AM
- 413 Views
I know that
21/05/2010 05:31:52 AM
- 339 Views
See, this is an area where your dialect argument would make sense.
21/05/2010 11:53:17 AM
- 329 Views
But that doesn't actually make any sense in Latin.
22/05/2010 03:03:28 AM
- 232 Views

I know it's dative in Latin
22/05/2010 03:14:48 AM
- 420 Views
Well, yes. But prepositions are how we decline our pronouns in English.
22/05/2010 04:35:42 AM
- 204 Views

And you would be wrong in that.
22/05/2010 02:27:16 PM
- 223 Views
Iċ am not sure what þū said me is relevant these days...
22/05/2010 09:57:41 PM
- 200 Views
You still just aren't getting this.
23/05/2010 12:52:31 AM
- 211 Views
I accept it. But not in the circumstances when the prepositional phrase "to/for me" is used.
*NM*
23/05/2010 02:27:30 AM
- 106 Views

You're confusing me almost as much as Larry.
22/05/2010 11:15:43 AM
- 404 Views

True. But English uses the reflexive in that scenario, not the personal pronoun.
22/05/2010 10:05:30 PM
- 242 Views
That was atrocious Latin.
22/05/2010 02:20:35 PM
- 437 Views
I was very drunk, and it wasn't that bad even had I been sober.
22/05/2010 10:04:12 PM
- 336 Views
Parare means, first and foremost, to prepare, supply or make something available.
23/05/2010 12:50:22 AM
- 337 Views
It also means to buy, and it frequently has that meaning when it's with the dative. No dice.
23/05/2010 02:31:01 AM
- 412 Views
Now you're pulling things out of your ass (about parare, at least)
23/05/2010 02:32:58 AM
- 215 Views
I unfortunately don't have the OLD, and no, I'm not.
23/05/2010 02:41:22 AM
- 251 Views

So I looked up the word in Lewis & Short.
23/05/2010 02:49:19 AM
- 213 Views
Interestingly enough, the Oxford Latin Dictionary doesn't have one use of the dative for "to buy".
23/05/2010 02:51:54 PM
- 424 Views
When asked who told him that killing was wrong, Johnny Five said "I told me."
21/05/2010 09:52:15 PM
- 231 Views
One additional thought.
22/05/2010 02:14:15 AM
- 357 Views
in my elementary school grammar classes...
21/05/2010 04:44:50 AM
- 262 Views
You clearly had an unusually good teacher. That's exactly what should be taught.
21/05/2010 12:00:58 PM
- 230 Views
Seriously dudes? 70 posts about fricking grammar?!
21/05/2010 06:46:58 PM
- 244 Views
I'm proud of us all. If it were about Akkadian grammar, I'd be even more proud. *NM*
21/05/2010 06:51:20 PM
- 212 Views
You could make it about Russian grammar
21/05/2010 07:05:35 PM
- 349 Views
I think I would only get slightly more interest than if it were Akkadian grammar.
21/05/2010 08:13:24 PM
- 350 Views
True
21/05/2010 08:45:54 PM
- 214 Views
Ah, you misunderstood my question.
21/05/2010 09:10:56 PM
- 423 Views
I guess I did
21/05/2010 09:25:53 PM
- 479 Views
