I'm not going on to another language after that. I could study Hittite, for example, or Sanskrit. However, I want to take what I've learned and use it to write some sort of work of non-fiction.
What would make interesting reading and involve Sumerian, Akkadian, Aramaic, Hebrew, Egyptian, Greek and Latin? I'm trying to stay away from the Bible just because it's already been picked apart to the core. Any ideas?
What would make interesting reading and involve Sumerian, Akkadian, Aramaic, Hebrew, Egyptian, Greek and Latin? I'm trying to stay away from the Bible just because it's already been picked apart to the core. Any ideas?
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
Inspired by Camilla's post: quit saying "between you and I" already
- 20/05/2010 04:16:29 PM
1130 Views
It isn't something I can recall really noticing
- 20/05/2010 04:22:42 PM
321 Views
You don't live in the United States of America. 
- 20/05/2010 04:31:23 PM
296 Views
- 20/05/2010 04:31:23 PM
296 Views
Well yes but me was just feeling smug it doesn't seem as common over here
- 20/05/2010 05:12:41 PM
290 Views
- 20/05/2010 05:12:41 PM
290 Views
I think this is one of those things people do because they think it makes them sound smart.
- 20/05/2010 04:33:38 PM
338 Views
When in actuality it exposese their stupidity and ignorance. *NM*
- 20/05/2010 04:36:08 PM
161 Views
Like saying "octopi". <Shivers> *NM*
- 20/05/2010 11:56:27 PM
263 Views
Octopodes makes them sounds like aliens 
- 21/05/2010 12:25:14 AM
420 Views
- 21/05/2010 12:25:14 AM
420 Views
THEY ARE VICIOUS CREATURES FROM THE DEEP. CUTTLEFISH HAVE W SHAPED PUPILS. *NM*
- 21/05/2010 07:00:41 AM
267 Views
Actually nothing like that
- 21/05/2010 04:49:43 PM
270 Views
As a Classicist I'm afraid I can't get past the misguided origins. *NM*
- 21/05/2010 10:08:34 PM
256 Views
I don't know how me feels about this.
- 20/05/2010 04:49:03 PM
324 Views
you know, considering my state was THE lowest in the country for education...
- 20/05/2010 05:04:42 PM
325 Views
That annoys me, too
- 20/05/2010 05:34:30 PM
451 Views
I think you're confusing it with phrase-final prepositions. *NM*
- 20/05/2010 11:57:30 PM
261 Views
No
- 21/05/2010 12:00:02 AM
272 Views
Oh right, that two (pro)nouns linked by "and" have to be the same case.
- 21/05/2010 12:03:59 AM
510 Views
Re: Oh right, that two (pro)nouns linked by "and" have to be the same case.
- 21/05/2010 12:06:51 AM
519 Views
Er, no...
- 21/05/2010 12:19:31 AM
261 Views
Re: Er, no...
- 21/05/2010 12:22:32 AM
285 Views
It doesn't. The reason for that is exactly as Tom says: idiotic teachers. *NM*
- 21/05/2010 12:28:12 AM
246 Views
But that is what I said when you contradicted me! *NM*
- 21/05/2010 12:38:11 AM
252 Views
OK, I'm officially lost.
- 21/05/2010 12:44:28 AM
311 Views
Re: OK, I'm officially lost.
- 21/05/2010 12:49:59 AM
495 Views
Can you start right from the beginning?
- 21/05/2010 12:52:08 AM
284 Views
Re: Can you start right from the beginning?
- 21/05/2010 12:55:34 AM
295 Views
Coffee time is going to be appropriated by grammar discussion? Shall I bring a book? *NM*
- 21/05/2010 10:12:48 AM
247 Views
*NM*
- 21/05/2010 10:12:48 AM
247 Views
Not entirely. We just need to get a hold of Pratchett's Unseen Academicals on the way.
- 21/05/2010 11:25:57 AM
258 Views
This whole thread is just an elaborate effort to provoke my complaints about terminal prepositions.
- 21/05/2010 02:58:05 PM
412 Views
Re: Inspired by Camilla's post: quit saying "between you and I" already
- 20/05/2010 07:28:16 PM
386 Views
It doesn't annoy me, but I do fine myself silently correcting it when I hear it.
- 20/05/2010 07:44:49 PM
322 Views
It's the same as "I" vs. "me". "Who" can only be a subject. "Whom" is correct everywhere else.
- 20/05/2010 07:47:21 PM
511 Views
Well, shucks, Tom, we just ain't no good at that there grammer stuff.
- 20/05/2010 07:49:18 PM
304 Views
Not limited to the US of A.
- 20/05/2010 08:26:30 PM
482 Views
It's properly the "US and A" - if Borat taught me nothing else, it's that.
- 20/05/2010 08:46:18 PM
282 Views
If you're going to start down that path...
- 20/05/2010 10:12:24 PM
302 Views
- 20/05/2010 10:12:24 PM
302 Views
<Winces at your use of the word "ungrammatical"> *NM*
- 21/05/2010 12:09:29 AM
272 Views
I take it the wincing is at the concept, and not at the word itself...
- 21/05/2010 12:32:43 AM
493 Views
- 21/05/2010 12:32:43 AM
493 Views
It's the misappropriation of linguistic terminology to an improper use.
- 21/05/2010 12:44:54 AM
564 Views
I note you haven't replied to the main thread yet...
- 21/05/2010 01:12:05 AM
400 Views
Well of course that's wrong. It ought to be "The man whom you said that was coming." 
*NM*
- 21/05/2010 07:03:37 AM
124 Views
*NM*
- 21/05/2010 07:03:37 AM
124 Views
OK, I know you're kidding around, but I can't tell if you know it isn't even prescriptively correct.
- 21/05/2010 10:38:51 AM
279 Views
I can't draw you a syntax tree or what have you to prove that it's wrong, no, but I know it is.
- 22/05/2010 02:56:52 AM
258 Views
- 22/05/2010 02:56:52 AM
258 Views
No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly.
- 22/05/2010 10:04:34 AM
449 Views
Clever clever. Explains why Greek changes the case in its indirect statements so much. *NM*
- 22/05/2010 09:47:26 PM
129 Views
Example please? *NM*
- 22/05/2010 10:34:05 PM
260 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly.
- 22/05/2010 11:40:05 PM
377 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly.
- 23/05/2010 10:30:59 AM
293 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly.
- 23/05/2010 10:36:25 AM
388 Views
*NM*
Cf pretty much every other European language, no?
- 23/05/2010 09:32:33 PM
262 Views
- 23/05/2010 09:32:33 PM
262 Views
Yes, but when you're a native speaker of English it comes as something of a surprise.
- 23/05/2010 11:18:45 PM
260 Views
The thing is that you really have to know Old English to figure it out.
- 24/05/2010 03:22:10 AM
268 Views
Actually, that would be a direct object
- 21/05/2010 01:11:42 AM
273 Views
*blinks* Now I'm confused.
- 21/05/2010 01:21:51 AM
259 Views
I know it's odd, but in terse responses, it seems to be a direct object rather than nominative
- 21/05/2010 01:46:10 AM
264 Views
No it isn't...in that case it would be "me", and not "a cookie", that is wanted.
- 21/05/2010 04:28:55 AM
276 Views
Well...
- 21/05/2010 04:33:27 AM
461 Views
"I want me a cookie" is not proper English.
- 21/05/2010 04:38:20 AM
462 Views
I know that
- 21/05/2010 05:31:52 AM
389 Views
See, this is an area where your dialect argument would make sense.
- 21/05/2010 11:53:17 AM
379 Views
But that doesn't actually make any sense in Latin.
- 22/05/2010 03:03:28 AM
273 Views
- 22/05/2010 03:03:28 AM
273 Views
I know it's dative in Latin
- 22/05/2010 03:14:48 AM
464 Views
Well, yes. But prepositions are how we decline our pronouns in English.
- 22/05/2010 04:35:42 AM
246 Views
- 22/05/2010 04:35:42 AM
246 Views
And you would be wrong in that.
- 22/05/2010 02:27:16 PM
274 Views
Iċ am not sure what þū said me is relevant these days...
- 22/05/2010 09:57:41 PM
248 Views
You still just aren't getting this.
- 23/05/2010 12:52:31 AM
260 Views
I accept it. But not in the circumstances when the prepositional phrase "to/for me" is used. *NM*
- 23/05/2010 02:27:30 AM
127 Views
*NM*
- 23/05/2010 02:27:30 AM
127 Views
You're confusing me almost as much as Larry.
- 22/05/2010 11:15:43 AM
452 Views
- 22/05/2010 11:15:43 AM
452 Views
True. But English uses the reflexive in that scenario, not the personal pronoun.
- 22/05/2010 10:05:30 PM
290 Views
That was atrocious Latin.
- 22/05/2010 02:20:35 PM
482 Views
I was very drunk, and it wasn't that bad even had I been sober.
- 22/05/2010 10:04:12 PM
381 Views
Parare means, first and foremost, to prepare, supply or make something available.
- 23/05/2010 12:50:22 AM
382 Views
It also means to buy, and it frequently has that meaning when it's with the dative. No dice.
- 23/05/2010 02:31:01 AM
514 Views
Now you're pulling things out of your ass (about parare, at least)
- 23/05/2010 02:32:58 AM
255 Views
I unfortunately don't have the OLD, and no, I'm not.
- 23/05/2010 02:41:22 AM
294 Views
- 23/05/2010 02:41:22 AM
294 Views
So I looked up the word in Lewis & Short.
- 23/05/2010 02:49:19 AM
252 Views
Interestingly enough, the Oxford Latin Dictionary doesn't have one use of the dative for "to buy".
- 23/05/2010 02:51:54 PM
467 Views
When asked who told him that killing was wrong, Johnny Five said "I told me."
- 21/05/2010 09:52:15 PM
278 Views
One additional thought.
- 22/05/2010 02:14:15 AM
403 Views
in my elementary school grammar classes...
- 21/05/2010 04:44:50 AM
312 Views
You clearly had an unusually good teacher. That's exactly what should be taught.
- 21/05/2010 12:00:58 PM
271 Views
Seriously dudes? 70 posts about fricking grammar?!
- 21/05/2010 06:46:58 PM
292 Views
- 24/05/2010 02:38:54 PM
395 Views
I'm proud of us all. If it were about Akkadian grammar, I'd be even more proud. *NM*
- 21/05/2010 06:51:20 PM
231 Views
You could make it about Russian grammar
- 21/05/2010 07:05:35 PM
389 Views
I think I would only get slightly more interest than if it were Akkadian grammar.
- 21/05/2010 08:13:24 PM
400 Views
True
- 21/05/2010 08:45:54 PM
264 Views
Ah, you misunderstood my question.
- 21/05/2010 09:10:56 PM
468 Views
I guess I did
- 21/05/2010 09:25:53 PM
530 Views
- 21/05/2010 09:25:53 PM
530 Views
- 24/05/2010 02:38:54 PM
395 Views