Active Users:477 Time:06/11/2025 01:52:49 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
One additional thought. everynametaken Send a noteboard - 22/05/2010 02:14:15 AM
you should also tackle the English (and, in fairness, French) habit of answering a question, like, say, "Who wants a cookie?" with "Me!". It's just as ungrammatical, but I've never heard anyone say otherwise in either English or French, so I rather doubt you'd get as much agreement if you tried correcting that one.

Another case of the same thing, again both in English and French, is to use "me" instead of "I" as a predicate ("It's me.";), though there in English at least I have heard the alternative, even if it sounds old-fashioned now.


You are assuming the answer to the question who wants a cookie is a statement when in it can be an imperative command to "give it to me."
English speaking children just beginning too speak understandable sentences often answer such questions in phrases such as "want cookie" or "give (me) cookie" and later add on the "me" to the command to give when they learn to self-identify as a "me". The answer "me" is deeply ingrained from childhood.

"I" is simply not a used response to a question. "I do" would be entirely acceptable but the word "me" in response to questions like this one encompass a lot of hidden material. Saying "me" in this instance can encompass an entire arrangement of response such as "I do, give me a cookie.", "I want a cookie, give me one.", etc.

All that can be said by simply cutting the excess and unnecessary words out - something learned way back in childhood before we even knew the excess words.

Just another angle to think about.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
Reply to message
Inspired by Camilla's post: quit saying "between you and I" already Tom - 20/05/2010 04:16:29 PM 1114 Views
It isn't something I can recall really noticing snoopcester - 20/05/2010 04:22:42 PM 308 Views
You don't live in the United States of America. Tom - 20/05/2010 04:31:23 PM 280 Views
Well yes but me was just feeling smug it doesn't seem as common over here snoopcester - 20/05/2010 05:12:41 PM 277 Views
Re: You don't live in the United States of America. Camilla - 20/05/2010 05:35:34 PM 298 Views
I think this is one of those things people do because they think it makes them sound smart. Sareitha Sedai - 20/05/2010 04:33:38 PM 322 Views
When in actuality it exposese their stupidity and ignorance. *NM* Tom - 20/05/2010 04:36:08 PM 155 Views
Like saying "octopi". <Shivers> *NM* Tim - 20/05/2010 11:56:27 PM 256 Views
Octopodes makes them sounds like aliens LadyLorraine - 21/05/2010 12:25:14 AM 402 Views
THEY ARE VICIOUS CREATURES FROM THE DEEP. CUTTLEFISH HAVE W SHAPED PUPILS. *NM* Ghavrel - 21/05/2010 07:00:41 AM 257 Views
Actually nothing like that Sareitha Sedai - 21/05/2010 04:49:43 PM 255 Views
Yeah, I've never had a problem with that one. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 21/05/2010 09:45:38 PM 265 Views
As a Classicist I'm afraid I can't get past the misguided origins. *NM* Tim - 21/05/2010 10:08:34 PM 251 Views
I don't know how me feels about this. Tigr - 20/05/2010 04:49:03 PM 310 Views
This makes me want cookies. *NM* Sareitha Sedai - 20/05/2010 04:50:34 PM 257 Views
I was thinking about him when I wrote it. Tigr - 20/05/2010 04:55:04 PM 292 Views
*NM* Avendesora - 20/05/2010 05:55:32 PM 134 Views
you know, considering my state was THE lowest in the country for education... LadyLorraine - 20/05/2010 05:04:42 PM 309 Views
Dude, I could care less *NM* Monkey - 20/05/2010 05:30:37 PM 239 Views
*cough* move along... ßelals Girl - 20/05/2010 07:16:18 PM 295 Views
That annoys me, too Camilla - 20/05/2010 05:34:30 PM 436 Views
I think you're confusing it with phrase-final prepositions. *NM* Tim - 20/05/2010 11:57:30 PM 254 Views
No Camilla - 21/05/2010 12:00:02 AM 255 Views
Oh right, that two (pro)nouns linked by "and" have to be the same case. Tim - 21/05/2010 12:03:59 AM 493 Views
Re: Oh right, that two (pro)nouns linked by "and" have to be the same case. Camilla - 21/05/2010 12:06:51 AM 504 Views
Er, no... Tim - 21/05/2010 12:19:31 AM 248 Views
Re: Er, no... Camilla - 21/05/2010 12:22:32 AM 273 Views
It doesn't. The reason for that is exactly as Tom says: idiotic teachers. *NM* Tim - 21/05/2010 12:28:12 AM 242 Views
But that is what I said when you contradicted me! *NM* Camilla - 21/05/2010 12:38:11 AM 246 Views
OK, I'm officially lost. Tim - 21/05/2010 12:44:28 AM 295 Views
Re: OK, I'm officially lost. Camilla - 21/05/2010 12:49:59 AM 479 Views
Can you start right from the beginning? Tim - 21/05/2010 12:52:08 AM 269 Views
Re: Can you start right from the beginning? Camilla - 21/05/2010 12:55:34 AM 279 Views
Please let me know when you sort this out. Tom - 21/05/2010 04:26:50 AM 238 Views
Sorted Camilla - 22/05/2010 03:06:53 AM 479 Views
Coffee time is going to be appropriated by grammar discussion? Shall I bring a book? *NM* Rebekah - 21/05/2010 10:12:48 AM 238 Views
Not entirely. We just need to get a hold of Pratchett's Unseen Academicals on the way. Camilla - 21/05/2010 11:25:57 AM 244 Views
This whole thread is just an elaborate effort to provoke my complaints about terminal prepositions. Joel - 21/05/2010 02:58:05 PM 399 Views
Ah, I think I've found the problem Camilla - 21/05/2010 11:50:59 AM 315 Views
Re: Inspired by Camilla's post: quit saying "between you and I" already ßelals Girl - 20/05/2010 07:28:16 PM 372 Views
Look at Camilla's post directly below. Tom - 20/05/2010 07:49:03 PM 303 Views
Well, the same problem appears in Swedish to some extent. jh - 20/05/2010 07:28:32 PM 512 Views
It doesn't annoy me, but I do fine myself silently correcting it when I hear it. Beqi - 20/05/2010 07:44:49 PM 305 Views
It's the same as "I" vs. "me". "Who" can only be a subject. "Whom" is correct everywhere else. Tom - 20/05/2010 07:47:21 PM 499 Views
That's where I get into trouble. Joel - 21/05/2010 03:01:18 PM 465 Views
Along these lines Sareitha Sedai - 20/05/2010 08:52:33 PM 471 Views
Well, shucks, Tom, we just ain't no good at that there grammer stuff. LiterateDog - 20/05/2010 07:49:18 PM 289 Views
And we're all unique little snowflakes. Tom - 20/05/2010 08:20:03 PM 294 Views
hollah that, brutha. *NM* LadyLorraine - 20/05/2010 08:41:03 PM 241 Views
You mean grammir. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 20/05/2010 09:41:55 PM 279 Views
Not limited to the US of A. Rebekah - 20/05/2010 08:26:30 PM 465 Views
It's properly the "US and A" - if Borat taught me nothing else, it's that. Tom - 20/05/2010 08:46:18 PM 268 Views
If you're going to start down that path... Legolas - 20/05/2010 10:12:24 PM 284 Views
Personally Sareitha Sedai - 20/05/2010 11:30:54 PM 231 Views
<Winces at your use of the word "ungrammatical"> *NM* Tim - 21/05/2010 12:09:29 AM 267 Views
I take it the wincing is at the concept, and not at the word itself... Legolas - 21/05/2010 12:32:43 AM 474 Views
It's the misappropriation of linguistic terminology to an improper use. Tim - 21/05/2010 12:44:54 AM 535 Views
I note you haven't replied to the main thread yet... Legolas - 21/05/2010 01:12:05 AM 382 Views
Re: I note you haven't replied to the main thread yet... Tim - 23/05/2010 01:36:10 PM 461 Views
Fair enough. Legolas - 23/05/2010 01:58:58 PM 254 Views
Well of course that's wrong. It ought to be "The man whom you said that was coming." *NM* Ghavrel - 21/05/2010 07:03:37 AM 118 Views
OK, I know you're kidding around, but I can't tell if you know it isn't even prescriptively correct. Tim - 21/05/2010 10:38:51 AM 264 Views
<chant> Camilla - 21/05/2010 11:52:17 AM 252 Views
I can't draw you a syntax tree or what have you to prove that it's wrong, no, but I know it is. Ghavrel - 22/05/2010 02:56:52 AM 239 Views
No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly. Tim - 22/05/2010 10:04:34 AM 435 Views
Clever clever. Explains why Greek changes the case in its indirect statements so much. *NM* Ghavrel - 22/05/2010 09:47:26 PM 123 Views
Example please? *NM* Tim - 22/05/2010 10:34:05 PM 254 Views
Yeah, I worded that awkwardly. Ghavrel - 23/05/2010 02:30:49 AM 266 Views
Ah, I see that I misread your subject line. Tim - 23/05/2010 01:17:28 PM 468 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly. Camilla - 22/05/2010 11:40:05 PM 361 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly. Tim - 23/05/2010 10:30:59 AM 281 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly. Camilla - 23/05/2010 10:36:25 AM 374 Views
Why = what for? That's amazing! *NM* Ghavrel - 23/05/2010 09:22:35 PM 128 Views
Cf pretty much every other European language, no? Legolas - 23/05/2010 09:32:33 PM 249 Views
Yes, but when you're a native speaker of English it comes as something of a surprise. Tim - 23/05/2010 11:18:45 PM 246 Views
The thing is that you really have to know Old English to figure it out. Ghavrel - 24/05/2010 03:22:10 AM 253 Views
Actually, that would be a direct object Larry - 21/05/2010 01:11:42 AM 257 Views
*blinks* Now I'm confused. Legolas - 21/05/2010 01:21:51 AM 244 Views
I know it's odd, but in terse responses, it seems to be a direct object rather than nominative Larry - 21/05/2010 01:46:10 AM 248 Views
No it isn't...in that case it would be "me", and not "a cookie", that is wanted. Tom - 21/05/2010 04:28:55 AM 261 Views
Well... Larry - 21/05/2010 04:33:27 AM 444 Views
"I want me a cookie" is not proper English. Tom - 21/05/2010 04:38:20 AM 447 Views
I know that Larry - 21/05/2010 05:31:52 AM 371 Views
See, this is an area where your dialect argument would make sense. Camilla - 21/05/2010 11:53:17 AM 363 Views
But that doesn't actually make any sense in Latin. Ghavrel - 22/05/2010 03:03:28 AM 260 Views
I know it's dative in Latin Larry - 22/05/2010 03:14:48 AM 451 Views
Well, yes. But prepositions are how we decline our pronouns in English. Ghavrel - 22/05/2010 04:35:42 AM 231 Views
And you would be wrong in that. Tom - 22/05/2010 02:27:16 PM 258 Views
Iċ am not sure what þū said me is relevant these days... Ghavrel - 22/05/2010 09:57:41 PM 235 Views
You still just aren't getting this. Tom - 23/05/2010 12:52:31 AM 239 Views
I accept it. But not in the circumstances when the prepositional phrase "to/for me" is used. *NM* Ghavrel - 23/05/2010 02:27:30 AM 123 Views
Technically, most prepositions in English take the dative. Tom - 23/05/2010 02:31:06 AM 9400 Views
Huh. That makes sense. *NM* Ghavrel - 23/05/2010 02:32:57 AM 114 Views
You're confusing me almost as much as Larry. Legolas - 22/05/2010 11:15:43 AM 435 Views
True. But English uses the reflexive in that scenario, not the personal pronoun. Ghavrel - 22/05/2010 10:05:30 PM 274 Views
That was atrocious Latin. Tom - 22/05/2010 02:20:35 PM 469 Views
I was very drunk, and it wasn't that bad even had I been sober. Ghavrel - 22/05/2010 10:04:12 PM 367 Views
Parare means, first and foremost, to prepare, supply or make something available. Tom - 23/05/2010 12:50:22 AM 368 Views
It also means to buy, and it frequently has that meaning when it's with the dative. No dice. Ghavrel - 23/05/2010 02:31:01 AM 485 Views
Now you're pulling things out of your ass (about parare, at least) Tom - 23/05/2010 02:32:58 AM 242 Views
I unfortunately don't have the OLD, and no, I'm not. Ghavrel - 23/05/2010 02:41:22 AM 277 Views
So I looked up the word in Lewis & Short. Ghavrel - 23/05/2010 02:49:19 AM 243 Views
Interestingly enough, the Oxford Latin Dictionary doesn't have one use of the dative for "to buy". Tom - 23/05/2010 02:51:54 PM 454 Views
Hm. I guess I have to concede defeat in this, then. Ghavrel - 23/05/2010 09:21:29 PM 256 Views
When asked who told him that killing was wrong, Johnny Five said "I told me." TaskmasterJack - 21/05/2010 09:52:15 PM 264 Views
Yes, yes I am. *NM* Tom - 21/05/2010 10:14:16 PM 118 Views
C'est moi. Tom - 21/05/2010 04:34:41 AM 455 Views
One additional thought. everynametaken - 22/05/2010 02:14:15 AM 388 Views
Let me clarify. Legolas - 22/05/2010 11:32:25 AM 261 Views
Please don;t misunderstand what I posted as beng preachy. everynametaken - 23/05/2010 11:12:43 PM 247 Views
in my elementary school grammar classes... damookster - 21/05/2010 04:44:50 AM 297 Views
I'm unaware of any exceptions. It's a very good rule. *NM* Ghavrel - 21/05/2010 07:04:23 AM 114 Views
You clearly had an unusually good teacher. That's exactly what should be taught. Tim - 21/05/2010 12:00:58 PM 257 Views
That is what I was taught... Dominic - 21/05/2010 02:28:40 PM 547 Views
Same. TaskmasterJack - 21/05/2010 09:54:10 PM 260 Views
I was taught the same. *NM* Gena - 24/05/2010 02:24:41 PM 279 Views
Seriously dudes? 70 posts about fricking grammar?! Monkey - 21/05/2010 06:46:58 PM 278 Views
I'm proud of us all. If it were about Akkadian grammar, I'd be even more proud. *NM* Tom - 21/05/2010 06:51:20 PM 225 Views
You could make it about Russian grammar Larry - 21/05/2010 07:05:35 PM 377 Views
I think I would only get slightly more interest than if it were Akkadian grammar. Tom - 21/05/2010 08:13:24 PM 386 Views
True Larry - 21/05/2010 08:45:54 PM 250 Views
Ah, you misunderstood my question. Tom - 21/05/2010 09:10:56 PM 453 Views
I guess I did Larry - 21/05/2010 09:25:53 PM 514 Views
Those all sound boring. Tom - 21/05/2010 10:03:25 PM 413 Views
Not if they are approached from a cultural vantage point Larry - 21/05/2010 10:28:02 PM 438 Views
Avendesora - 24/05/2010 02:38:54 PM 378 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes