Active Users:613 Time:21/03/2026 11:05:24 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Parare means, first and foremost, to prepare, supply or make something available. Tom Send a noteboard - 23/05/2010 12:50:22 AM
When you use it with res, it sounds as though someone is preparing a legal brief. If you were to use it with aere and a more substantive word, you could more credibly argue that you're using it in the sense of "to buy". In a situation where the object is very vague, it's best to use a verb that is more often used for "buy" like comparare.

The reason I brought the point up in the first place was that you said:

"I bought myself something." = Rem mihi paravi. The incorrect construction "I bought me something" would be rem me paravi--a construction which doesn't show up in Latin.

WRONG! "Me" is the proper dative, as well as the proper accusative, for English. "I bought me something" is incorrect only because the reflexive is not being used. "He bought me something" (changing the subject) would be ABSOLUTELY CORRECT AND WITH "ME" IN THE DATIVE.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Inspired by Camilla's post: quit saying "between you and I" already Tom - 20/05/2010 04:16:29 PM 1155 Views
It isn't something I can recall really noticing snoopcester - 20/05/2010 04:22:42 PM 350 Views
You don't live in the United States of America. Tom - 20/05/2010 04:31:23 PM 327 Views
Well yes but me was just feeling smug it doesn't seem as common over here snoopcester - 20/05/2010 05:12:41 PM 317 Views
Re: You don't live in the United States of America. Camilla - 20/05/2010 05:35:34 PM 336 Views
I think this is one of those things people do because they think it makes them sound smart. Sareitha Sedai - 20/05/2010 04:33:38 PM 367 Views
When in actuality it exposese their stupidity and ignorance. *NM* Tom - 20/05/2010 04:36:08 PM 176 Views
Like saying "octopi". <Shivers> *NM* Tim - 20/05/2010 11:56:27 PM 276 Views
Octopodes makes them sounds like aliens LadyLorraine - 21/05/2010 12:25:14 AM 446 Views
THEY ARE VICIOUS CREATURES FROM THE DEEP. CUTTLEFISH HAVE W SHAPED PUPILS. *NM* Ghavrel - 21/05/2010 07:00:41 AM 291 Views
Actually nothing like that Sareitha Sedai - 21/05/2010 04:49:43 PM 297 Views
Yeah, I've never had a problem with that one. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 21/05/2010 09:45:38 PM 283 Views
As a Classicist I'm afraid I can't get past the misguided origins. *NM* Tim - 21/05/2010 10:08:34 PM 268 Views
I don't know how me feels about this. Tigr - 20/05/2010 04:49:03 PM 352 Views
This makes me want cookies. *NM* Sareitha Sedai - 20/05/2010 04:50:34 PM 274 Views
I was thinking about him when I wrote it. Tigr - 20/05/2010 04:55:04 PM 333 Views
*NM* Avendesora - 20/05/2010 05:55:32 PM 156 Views
you know, considering my state was THE lowest in the country for education... LadyLorraine - 20/05/2010 05:04:42 PM 347 Views
Dude, I could care less *NM* Monkey - 20/05/2010 05:30:37 PM 258 Views
*cough* move along... ßelals Girl - 20/05/2010 07:16:18 PM 333 Views
That annoys me, too Camilla - 20/05/2010 05:34:30 PM 480 Views
I think you're confusing it with phrase-final prepositions. *NM* Tim - 20/05/2010 11:57:30 PM 275 Views
No Camilla - 21/05/2010 12:00:02 AM 298 Views
Oh right, that two (pro)nouns linked by "and" have to be the same case. Tim - 21/05/2010 12:03:59 AM 538 Views
Re: Oh right, that two (pro)nouns linked by "and" have to be the same case. Camilla - 21/05/2010 12:06:51 AM 549 Views
Er, no... Tim - 21/05/2010 12:19:31 AM 289 Views
Re: Er, no... Camilla - 21/05/2010 12:22:32 AM 305 Views
It doesn't. The reason for that is exactly as Tom says: idiotic teachers. *NM* Tim - 21/05/2010 12:28:12 AM 257 Views
But that is what I said when you contradicted me! *NM* Camilla - 21/05/2010 12:38:11 AM 263 Views
OK, I'm officially lost. Tim - 21/05/2010 12:44:28 AM 341 Views
Re: OK, I'm officially lost. Camilla - 21/05/2010 12:49:59 AM 524 Views
Can you start right from the beginning? Tim - 21/05/2010 12:52:08 AM 306 Views
Re: Can you start right from the beginning? Camilla - 21/05/2010 12:55:34 AM 320 Views
Please let me know when you sort this out. Tom - 21/05/2010 04:26:50 AM 275 Views
Sorted Camilla - 22/05/2010 03:06:53 AM 516 Views
Coffee time is going to be appropriated by grammar discussion? Shall I bring a book? *NM* Rebekah - 21/05/2010 10:12:48 AM 263 Views
Not entirely. We just need to get a hold of Pratchett's Unseen Academicals on the way. Camilla - 21/05/2010 11:25:57 AM 289 Views
This whole thread is just an elaborate effort to provoke my complaints about terminal prepositions. Joel - 21/05/2010 02:58:05 PM 437 Views
Ah, I think I've found the problem Camilla - 21/05/2010 11:50:59 AM 354 Views
Re: Inspired by Camilla's post: quit saying "between you and I" already ßelals Girl - 20/05/2010 07:28:16 PM 412 Views
Look at Camilla's post directly below. Tom - 20/05/2010 07:49:03 PM 336 Views
Well, the same problem appears in Swedish to some extent. jh - 20/05/2010 07:28:32 PM 555 Views
It doesn't annoy me, but I do fine myself silently correcting it when I hear it. Beqi - 20/05/2010 07:44:49 PM 351 Views
It's the same as "I" vs. "me". "Who" can only be a subject. "Whom" is correct everywhere else. Tom - 20/05/2010 07:47:21 PM 537 Views
That's where I get into trouble. Joel - 21/05/2010 03:01:18 PM 504 Views
Along these lines Sareitha Sedai - 20/05/2010 08:52:33 PM 510 Views
Well, shucks, Tom, we just ain't no good at that there grammer stuff. LiterateDog - 20/05/2010 07:49:18 PM 329 Views
And we're all unique little snowflakes. Tom - 20/05/2010 08:20:03 PM 333 Views
hollah that, brutha. *NM* LadyLorraine - 20/05/2010 08:41:03 PM 261 Views
You mean grammir. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 20/05/2010 09:41:55 PM 298 Views
Not limited to the US of A. Rebekah - 20/05/2010 08:26:30 PM 507 Views
It's properly the "US and A" - if Borat taught me nothing else, it's that. Tom - 20/05/2010 08:46:18 PM 309 Views
If you're going to start down that path... Legolas - 20/05/2010 10:12:24 PM 328 Views
Personally Sareitha Sedai - 20/05/2010 11:30:54 PM 272 Views
<Winces at your use of the word "ungrammatical"> *NM* Tim - 21/05/2010 12:09:29 AM 285 Views
I take it the wincing is at the concept, and not at the word itself... Legolas - 21/05/2010 12:32:43 AM 521 Views
It's the misappropriation of linguistic terminology to an improper use. Tim - 21/05/2010 12:44:54 AM 593 Views
I note you haven't replied to the main thread yet... Legolas - 21/05/2010 01:12:05 AM 433 Views
Re: I note you haven't replied to the main thread yet... Tim - 23/05/2010 01:36:10 PM 502 Views
Fair enough. Legolas - 23/05/2010 01:58:58 PM 288 Views
Well of course that's wrong. It ought to be "The man whom you said that was coming." *NM* Ghavrel - 21/05/2010 07:03:37 AM 139 Views
OK, I know you're kidding around, but I can't tell if you know it isn't even prescriptively correct. Tim - 21/05/2010 10:38:51 AM 300 Views
<chant> Camilla - 21/05/2010 11:52:17 AM 292 Views
I can't draw you a syntax tree or what have you to prove that it's wrong, no, but I know it is. Ghavrel - 22/05/2010 02:56:52 AM 289 Views
No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly. Tim - 22/05/2010 10:04:34 AM 473 Views
Clever clever. Explains why Greek changes the case in its indirect statements so much. *NM* Ghavrel - 22/05/2010 09:47:26 PM 140 Views
Example please? *NM* Tim - 22/05/2010 10:34:05 PM 273 Views
Yeah, I worded that awkwardly. Ghavrel - 23/05/2010 02:30:49 AM 303 Views
Ah, I see that I misread your subject line. Tim - 23/05/2010 01:17:28 PM 512 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly. Camilla - 22/05/2010 11:40:05 PM 409 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly. Tim - 23/05/2010 10:30:59 AM 323 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly. Camilla - 23/05/2010 10:36:25 AM 417 Views
Why = what for? That's amazing! *NM* Ghavrel - 23/05/2010 09:22:35 PM 142 Views
Cf pretty much every other European language, no? Legolas - 23/05/2010 09:32:33 PM 294 Views
Yes, but when you're a native speaker of English it comes as something of a surprise. Tim - 23/05/2010 11:18:45 PM 289 Views
The thing is that you really have to know Old English to figure it out. Ghavrel - 24/05/2010 03:22:10 AM 293 Views
Actually, that would be a direct object Larry - 21/05/2010 01:11:42 AM 300 Views
*blinks* Now I'm confused. Legolas - 21/05/2010 01:21:51 AM 283 Views
I know it's odd, but in terse responses, it seems to be a direct object rather than nominative Larry - 21/05/2010 01:46:10 AM 290 Views
No it isn't...in that case it would be "me", and not "a cookie", that is wanted. Tom - 21/05/2010 04:28:55 AM 302 Views
Well... Larry - 21/05/2010 04:33:27 AM 485 Views
"I want me a cookie" is not proper English. Tom - 21/05/2010 04:38:20 AM 491 Views
I know that Larry - 21/05/2010 05:31:52 AM 411 Views
See, this is an area where your dialect argument would make sense. Camilla - 21/05/2010 11:53:17 AM 407 Views
But that doesn't actually make any sense in Latin. Ghavrel - 22/05/2010 03:03:28 AM 297 Views
I know it's dative in Latin Larry - 22/05/2010 03:14:48 AM 490 Views
Well, yes. But prepositions are how we decline our pronouns in English. Ghavrel - 22/05/2010 04:35:42 AM 277 Views
And you would be wrong in that. Tom - 22/05/2010 02:27:16 PM 297 Views
Iċ am not sure what þū said me is relevant these days... Ghavrel - 22/05/2010 09:57:41 PM 275 Views
You still just aren't getting this. Tom - 23/05/2010 12:52:31 AM 287 Views
I accept it. But not in the circumstances when the prepositional phrase "to/for me" is used. *NM* Ghavrel - 23/05/2010 02:27:30 AM 138 Views
Technically, most prepositions in English take the dative. Tom - 23/05/2010 02:31:06 AM 9439 Views
Huh. That makes sense. *NM* Ghavrel - 23/05/2010 02:32:57 AM 134 Views
You're confusing me almost as much as Larry. Legolas - 22/05/2010 11:15:43 AM 476 Views
True. But English uses the reflexive in that scenario, not the personal pronoun. Ghavrel - 22/05/2010 10:05:30 PM 314 Views
That was atrocious Latin. Tom - 22/05/2010 02:20:35 PM 511 Views
I was very drunk, and it wasn't that bad even had I been sober. Ghavrel - 22/05/2010 10:04:12 PM 409 Views
Parare means, first and foremost, to prepare, supply or make something available. Tom - 23/05/2010 12:50:22 AM 410 Views
It also means to buy, and it frequently has that meaning when it's with the dative. No dice. Ghavrel - 23/05/2010 02:31:01 AM 549 Views
Now you're pulling things out of your ass (about parare, at least) Tom - 23/05/2010 02:32:58 AM 280 Views
I unfortunately don't have the OLD, and no, I'm not. Ghavrel - 23/05/2010 02:41:22 AM 321 Views
So I looked up the word in Lewis & Short. Ghavrel - 23/05/2010 02:49:19 AM 277 Views
Interestingly enough, the Oxford Latin Dictionary doesn't have one use of the dative for "to buy". Tom - 23/05/2010 02:51:54 PM 491 Views
Hm. I guess I have to concede defeat in this, then. Ghavrel - 23/05/2010 09:21:29 PM 303 Views
When asked who told him that killing was wrong, Johnny Five said "I told me." TaskmasterJack - 21/05/2010 09:52:15 PM 302 Views
Yes, yes I am. *NM* Tom - 21/05/2010 10:14:16 PM 134 Views
C'est moi. Tom - 21/05/2010 04:34:41 AM 498 Views
One additional thought. everynametaken - 22/05/2010 02:14:15 AM 431 Views
Let me clarify. Legolas - 22/05/2010 11:32:25 AM 297 Views
Please don;t misunderstand what I posted as beng preachy. everynametaken - 23/05/2010 11:12:43 PM 284 Views
in my elementary school grammar classes... damookster - 21/05/2010 04:44:50 AM 337 Views
I'm unaware of any exceptions. It's a very good rule. *NM* Ghavrel - 21/05/2010 07:04:23 AM 134 Views
You clearly had an unusually good teacher. That's exactly what should be taught. Tim - 21/05/2010 12:00:58 PM 297 Views
That is what I was taught... Dominic - 21/05/2010 02:28:40 PM 589 Views
Same. TaskmasterJack - 21/05/2010 09:54:10 PM 322 Views
I was taught the same. *NM* Gena - 24/05/2010 02:24:41 PM 297 Views
Seriously dudes? 70 posts about fricking grammar?! Monkey - 21/05/2010 06:46:58 PM 309 Views
I'm proud of us all. If it were about Akkadian grammar, I'd be even more proud. *NM* Tom - 21/05/2010 06:51:20 PM 244 Views
You could make it about Russian grammar Larry - 21/05/2010 07:05:35 PM 411 Views
I think I would only get slightly more interest than if it were Akkadian grammar. Tom - 21/05/2010 08:13:24 PM 424 Views
True Larry - 21/05/2010 08:45:54 PM 288 Views
Ah, you misunderstood my question. Tom - 21/05/2010 09:10:56 PM 491 Views
I guess I did Larry - 21/05/2010 09:25:53 PM 555 Views
Those all sound boring. Tom - 21/05/2010 10:03:25 PM 457 Views
Not if they are approached from a cultural vantage point Larry - 21/05/2010 10:28:02 PM 474 Views
Avendesora - 24/05/2010 02:38:54 PM 422 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes