Disclaimer: this small joke is not an attempt to claim that the god-of-the-gaps mentality applies to science; the philosophies behind the superficial similarities are very different.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
US experiment hints at 'multiple God particles'
15/06/2010 04:04:14 AM
- 813 Views
I minored in modern physics, which means, I have enough knowledge to be.....
15/06/2010 04:45:35 AM
- 408 Views
this has always bothered me about particle physicists....
15/06/2010 05:32:26 AM
- 440 Views
Down with particle-of-the-gaps thinking!
15/06/2010 05:38:20 AM
- 432 Views
Yeah, always been my problem, too.
15/06/2010 05:44:30 AM
- 377 Views
Lederman wanted to call it "the goddamn particle," but the publisher wouldn't let him.
15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM
- 400 Views

Well, we've been pretty bad at name stuff
15/06/2010 08:52:09 AM
- 411 Views
"Giant radiating dyke swarms"?!!!
15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM
- 402 Views

It's more than a few right answers.
15/06/2010 06:26:35 AM
- 518 Views
did you go to school in wisconsin? cause you sound just like that guy
15/06/2010 07:07:49 AM
- 384 Views

Yet, when determining the measure for what a planet is, Pluto vanished from the list!
15/06/2010 07:14:28 AM
- 416 Views

right, but it's still out there in the same orbit with the same momentum and positioning
15/06/2010 08:45:43 AM
- 513 Views

It had to lose its status or you'd have to memorize several more planets
15/06/2010 08:57:20 AM
- 430 Views
y'all are screwing up my "uncertainty principle" joke dammit!
*NM*
15/06/2010 09:19:11 AM
- 170 Views

I was disappointed they didn't make all the dwarf planets into planet planets.
16/06/2010 01:00:51 PM
- 427 Views
As a physicist, I find this quite interesting.
16/06/2010 09:08:15 PM
- 520 Views
Not quite.
16/06/2010 09:57:18 PM
- 503 Views
Re: Not quite.
16/06/2010 10:22:14 PM
- 520 Views