Active Users:558 Time:05/03/2026 03:35:31 PM
As a physicist... Dreaded Anomaly Send a noteboard - 15/06/2010 06:13:01 AM
The new CP violation result itself is still questionable; the rule of thumb is that 5-sigma evidence is needed for firm confirmation, and this is only 3-sigma. Plus, CDF doesn't see it at all, although (as mentioned in the paper) CDF's result comes from much less data than DZero's.

The suggestion that two Higgs doublets would account for this interaction seems to have some theoretical merit, although it depends on several other assumptions about the nature of supersymmetry.

Here's a link to their actual paper:
CP violation in B_s mixing from heavy Higgs exchange
Reply to message
US experiment hints at 'multiple God particles' - 15/06/2010 04:04:14 AM 893 Views
- 15/06/2010 04:11:11 AM 487 Views
this has always bothered me about particle physicists.... - 15/06/2010 05:32:26 AM 508 Views
Down with particle-of-the-gaps thinking! - 15/06/2010 05:38:20 AM 494 Views
Yeah, always been my problem, too. - 15/06/2010 05:44:30 AM 441 Views
Lederman wanted to call it "the goddamn particle," but the publisher wouldn't let him. - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM 459 Views
Well, we've been pretty bad at name stuff - 15/06/2010 08:52:09 AM 473 Views
"Giant radiating dyke swarms"?!!! - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM 464 Views
Oh, yes, and it's often accompanied by Dickite - 15/06/2010 06:18:35 PM 446 Views
This I can believe. - 15/06/2010 06:02:37 PM 398 Views
It's more than a few right answers. - 15/06/2010 06:26:35 AM 597 Views
As a physicist... - 15/06/2010 06:13:01 AM 587 Views
Cool. - 16/06/2010 01:01:34 PM 489 Views
I feel ya! *NM* - 17/06/2010 12:18:30 AM 265 Views
As a physicist, I find this quite interesting. - 16/06/2010 09:08:15 PM 579 Views
Not quite. - 16/06/2010 09:57:18 PM 578 Views
Re: Not quite. - 16/06/2010 10:22:14 PM 596 Views
Nerds! - 17/06/2010 12:19:57 AM 419 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 12:45:06 AM 648 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 08:23:10 AM 570 Views
Eight minus three is five - 17/06/2010 09:19:46 AM 411 Views

Reply to Message