Active Users:949 Time:14/09/2025 07:54:25 AM
As a physicist... Dreaded Anomaly Send a noteboard - 15/06/2010 06:13:01 AM
The new CP violation result itself is still questionable; the rule of thumb is that 5-sigma evidence is needed for firm confirmation, and this is only 3-sigma. Plus, CDF doesn't see it at all, although (as mentioned in the paper) CDF's result comes from much less data than DZero's.

The suggestion that two Higgs doublets would account for this interaction seems to have some theoretical merit, although it depends on several other assumptions about the nature of supersymmetry.

Here's a link to their actual paper:
CP violation in B_s mixing from heavy Higgs exchange
Reply to message
US experiment hints at 'multiple God particles' - 15/06/2010 04:04:14 AM 837 Views
- 15/06/2010 04:11:11 AM 442 Views
this has always bothered me about particle physicists.... - 15/06/2010 05:32:26 AM 458 Views
Down with particle-of-the-gaps thinking! - 15/06/2010 05:38:20 AM 453 Views
Yeah, always been my problem, too. - 15/06/2010 05:44:30 AM 396 Views
Lederman wanted to call it "the goddamn particle," but the publisher wouldn't let him. - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM 418 Views
Well, we've been pretty bad at name stuff - 15/06/2010 08:52:09 AM 427 Views
"Giant radiating dyke swarms"?!!! - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM 421 Views
Oh, yes, and it's often accompanied by Dickite - 15/06/2010 06:18:35 PM 409 Views
This I can believe. - 15/06/2010 06:02:37 PM 361 Views
It's more than a few right answers. - 15/06/2010 06:26:35 AM 534 Views
As a physicist... - 15/06/2010 06:13:01 AM 544 Views
Cool. - 16/06/2010 01:01:34 PM 455 Views
I feel ya! *NM* - 17/06/2010 12:18:30 AM 247 Views
As a physicist, I find this quite interesting. - 16/06/2010 09:08:15 PM 538 Views
Not quite. - 16/06/2010 09:57:18 PM 523 Views
Re: Not quite. - 16/06/2010 10:22:14 PM 538 Views
Nerds! - 17/06/2010 12:19:57 AM 361 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 12:45:06 AM 584 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 08:23:10 AM 521 Views
Eight minus three is five - 17/06/2010 09:19:46 AM 364 Views

Reply to Message