The new CP violation result itself is still questionable; the rule of thumb is that 5-sigma evidence is needed for firm confirmation, and this is only 3-sigma. Plus, CDF doesn't see it at all, although (as mentioned in the paper) CDF's result comes from much less data than DZero's.
The suggestion that two Higgs doublets would account for this interaction seems to have some theoretical merit, although it depends on several other assumptions about the nature of supersymmetry.
Here's a link to their actual paper:
	The suggestion that two Higgs doublets would account for this interaction seems to have some theoretical merit, although it depends on several other assumptions about the nature of supersymmetry.
Here's a link to their actual paper:
			US experiment hints at 'multiple God particles'
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 04:04:14 AM
	        855 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
			I minored in modern physics, which means, I have enough knowledge to be.....
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 04:45:35 AM
	        441 Views
	        
	    
	
		
	    
			this has always bothered me about particle physicists....
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 05:32:26 AM
	        480 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
		
			Yeah, always been my problem, too.
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 05:44:30 AM
	        408 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Lederman wanted to call it "the goddamn particle," but the publisher wouldn't let him.  - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM
	        434 Views
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM
	        434 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	     - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM
	        434 Views
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM
	        434 Views
	        
	
		
	    
			Well, we've been pretty bad at name stuff
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 08:52:09 AM
	        443 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
			"Giant radiating dyke swarms"?!!!  - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM
	        436 Views
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM
	        436 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	     - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM
	        436 Views
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM
	        436 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			It's more than a few right answers.
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 06:26:35 AM
	        563 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			did you go to school in wisconsin? cause you sound just like that guy  - 15/06/2010 07:07:49 AM
	        421 Views
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 07:07:49 AM
	        421 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	     - 15/06/2010 07:07:49 AM
	        421 Views
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 07:07:49 AM
	        421 Views
	        
	
		
	    
			Yet, when determining the measure for what a planet is, Pluto vanished from the list!  - 15/06/2010 07:14:28 AM
	        460 Views
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 07:14:28 AM
	        460 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	     - 15/06/2010 07:14:28 AM
	        460 Views
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 07:14:28 AM
	        460 Views
	        
	
		
	    
			right, but it's still out there in the same orbit with the same momentum and positioning  - 15/06/2010 08:45:43 AM
	        553 Views
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 08:45:43 AM
	        553 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	     - 15/06/2010 08:45:43 AM
	        553 Views
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 08:45:43 AM
	        553 Views
	        
	
		
	    
			It had to lose its status or you'd have to memorize several more planets
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 08:57:20 AM
	        461 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			y'all are screwing up my "uncertainty principle" joke dammit!  *NM*
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 09:19:11 AM
	        184 Views
 *NM*
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 09:19:11 AM
	        184 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
		
	     *NM*
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 09:19:11 AM
	        184 Views
 *NM*
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 09:19:11 AM
	        184 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			I was disappointed they didn't make all the dwarf planets into planet planets.
	    
	         - 16/06/2010 01:00:51 PM
	        456 Views
	        
	    
	
	    		
			As a physicist...
		
	         - 15/06/2010 06:13:01 AM
	        557 Views
	        
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			As a physicist, I find this quite interesting.
	    
	         - 16/06/2010 09:08:15 PM
	        551 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Not quite.
	    
	         - 16/06/2010 09:57:18 PM
	        545 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: Not quite.
	    
	         - 16/06/2010 10:22:14 PM
	        563 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	    
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 Totally missed it *NM*
 Totally missed it *NM*