Active Users:175 Time:18/06/2024 06:13:06 PM
right, but it's still out there in the same orbit with the same momentum and positioning moondog Send a noteboard - 15/06/2010 08:45:43 AM
There are currently six known quarks: up, down, strange, charm, bottom, top. Only the first three were known before the second three were predicted by theory in the early 70s; they were all eventually confirmed by experiment, but the top quark wasn't found until 1995.

That's one example of how powerful the predictions of theory can be; there are many more. Obviously, there are a lot of incorrect theories, too. It may seem like physicists just invent new particles to solve any problems, but no matter what we hypothesize, it all comes down to what the experiments show. So far, we have found many predicted "new" particles in consistent ways (although the list of particles that have been proposed and never found is very large indeed).

The Higgs mechanism has been around since 1964, along with the prediction of at least one new particle to go along with it. It's only now that we have the technology to probe the high energy range at which such a particle could be seen.

Don't get caught up in sensationalized news reporting, which makes everything seem like a brand new invention. (To be fair, this was actually one of the better mass-consumption science articles I've read recently.) Most of the theories for which we'll soon be searching for evidence have been around in some form for decades now, being refined and probed.


oh, i'm well familiar with the theory behind the particles, it just seems like a lot of guesswork and hand waving to me. maybe i should have taken more than a couple semesters of quantum mechanics but i've always been more of an astrophysics kind of person as opposed to particles ;) of course, on the astro side, the discovery of literally 100s of planets when there were only 9 (now 8) before started out like hand waving and guesswork but at least planets don't disappear when you try to measure them :P
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
US experiment hints at 'multiple God particles' - 15/06/2010 04:04:14 AM 703 Views
- 15/06/2010 04:11:11 AM 347 Views
this has always bothered me about particle physicists.... - 15/06/2010 05:32:26 AM 355 Views
Down with particle-of-the-gaps thinking! - 15/06/2010 05:38:20 AM 346 Views
Yeah, always been my problem, too. - 15/06/2010 05:44:30 AM 297 Views
Lederman wanted to call it "the goddamn particle," but the publisher wouldn't let him. - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM 319 Views
Well, we've been pretty bad at name stuff - 15/06/2010 08:52:09 AM 326 Views
"Giant radiating dyke swarms"?!!! - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM 323 Views
Oh, yes, and it's often accompanied by Dickite - 15/06/2010 06:18:35 PM 313 Views
This I can believe. - 15/06/2010 06:02:37 PM 264 Views
It's more than a few right answers. - 15/06/2010 06:26:35 AM 443 Views
did you go to school in wisconsin? cause you sound just like that guy - 15/06/2010 07:07:49 AM 302 Views
Yet, when determining the measure for what a planet is, Pluto vanished from the list! - 15/06/2010 07:14:28 AM 336 Views
right, but it's still out there in the same orbit with the same momentum and positioning - 15/06/2010 08:45:43 AM 425 Views
It had to lose its status or you'd have to memorize several more planets - 15/06/2010 08:57:20 AM 358 Views
y'all are screwing up my "uncertainty principle" joke dammit! *NM* - 15/06/2010 09:19:11 AM 138 Views
Sorry Totally missed it *NM* - 15/06/2010 09:45:23 AM 190 Views
As a physicist... - 15/06/2010 06:13:01 AM 443 Views
Cool. - 16/06/2010 01:01:34 PM 361 Views
I feel ya! *NM* - 17/06/2010 12:18:30 AM 209 Views
As a physicist, I find this quite interesting. - 16/06/2010 09:08:15 PM 442 Views
Not quite. - 16/06/2010 09:57:18 PM 427 Views
Re: Not quite. - 16/06/2010 10:22:14 PM 437 Views
Nerds! - 17/06/2010 12:19:57 AM 265 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 12:45:06 AM 494 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 08:23:10 AM 419 Views
Eight minus three is five - 17/06/2010 09:19:46 AM 242 Views

Reply to Message