Active Users:2161 Time:25/10/2026 09:38:29 PM
Well, we've been pretty bad at name stuff Isaac Send a noteboard - 15/06/2010 08:52:09 AM
Considering we named quarks for the noise ducks don't exactly make but maybe seagulls do and their binding particle for glue, then said they come in 'flavors' of 'Topness', Bottomness', etc and 'colors' I'm surprised we haven't just decided to start naming the damn things after breakfast cereals, now that we've exhausted just about every old alphabet, and still have J/? instead of picking one. It could be worse, geophysics has a term called 'giant radiating dyke swarms', all things considered it's probably better that editors, sci-fi writers, and mass media having been picking the names of a lot of this stuff.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
US experiment hints at 'multiple God particles' - 15/06/2010 04:04:14 AM 989 Views
- 15/06/2010 04:11:11 AM 564 Views
this has always bothered me about particle physicists.... - 15/06/2010 05:32:26 AM 607 Views
Down with particle-of-the-gaps thinking! - 15/06/2010 05:38:20 AM 583 Views
Yeah, always been my problem, too. - 15/06/2010 05:44:30 AM 524 Views
Lederman wanted to call it "the goddamn particle," but the publisher wouldn't let him. - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM 547 Views
Well, we've been pretty bad at name stuff - 15/06/2010 08:52:09 AM 562 Views
"Giant radiating dyke swarms"?!!! - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM 553 Views
Oh, yes, and it's often accompanied by Dickite - 15/06/2010 06:18:35 PM 537 Views
This I can believe. - 15/06/2010 06:02:37 PM 489 Views
It's more than a few right answers. - 15/06/2010 06:26:35 AM 682 Views
As a physicist... - 15/06/2010 06:13:01 AM 687 Views
Cool. - 16/06/2010 01:01:34 PM 585 Views
I feel ya! *NM* - 17/06/2010 12:18:30 AM 311 Views
As a physicist, I find this quite interesting. - 16/06/2010 09:08:15 PM 672 Views
Not quite. - 16/06/2010 09:57:18 PM 678 Views
Re: Not quite. - 16/06/2010 10:22:14 PM 693 Views
Nerds! - 17/06/2010 12:19:57 AM 508 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 12:45:06 AM 742 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 08:23:10 AM 665 Views
Eight minus three is five - 17/06/2010 09:19:46 AM 505 Views

Reply to Message