In the supersymmetric model there'd be eight particles related to the Higgs mechanism. Three of these would be eaten by W and Z bosons. That leaves five yet to be found. ¿Comprende?
--- signature starts here ---
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
US experiment hints at 'multiple God particles'
15/06/2010 04:04:14 AM
- 838 Views
I minored in modern physics, which means, I have enough knowledge to be.....
15/06/2010 04:45:35 AM
- 431 Views
this has always bothered me about particle physicists....
15/06/2010 05:32:26 AM
- 459 Views
Yeah, always been my problem, too.
15/06/2010 05:44:30 AM
- 398 Views
Lederman wanted to call it "the goddamn particle," but the publisher wouldn't let him.
15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM
- 418 Views

Well, we've been pretty bad at name stuff
15/06/2010 08:52:09 AM
- 428 Views
"Giant radiating dyke swarms"?!!!
15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM
- 422 Views

It's more than a few right answers.
15/06/2010 06:26:35 AM
- 536 Views
did you go to school in wisconsin? cause you sound just like that guy
15/06/2010 07:07:49 AM
- 401 Views

Yet, when determining the measure for what a planet is, Pluto vanished from the list!
15/06/2010 07:14:28 AM
- 430 Views

right, but it's still out there in the same orbit with the same momentum and positioning
15/06/2010 08:45:43 AM
- 532 Views

It had to lose its status or you'd have to memorize several more planets
15/06/2010 08:57:20 AM
- 449 Views
y'all are screwing up my "uncertainty principle" joke dammit!
*NM*
15/06/2010 09:19:11 AM
- 177 Views

I was disappointed they didn't make all the dwarf planets into planet planets.
16/06/2010 01:00:51 PM
- 446 Views
As a physicist, I find this quite interesting.
16/06/2010 09:08:15 PM
- 540 Views
Not quite.
16/06/2010 09:57:18 PM
- 524 Views
Re: Not quite.
16/06/2010 10:22:14 PM
- 540 Views
Re: Not quite.
17/06/2010 12:45:06 AM
- 586 Views
Re: Not quite.
17/06/2010 08:23:10 AM
- 521 Views
Eight minus three is five
17/06/2010 09:19:46 AM
- 366 Views