Active Users:713 Time:16/02/2026 08:27:51 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Is that assumption valid? Isaac Send a noteboard - 09/08/2010 12:07:22 PM
I meant my reply was tangential.


LOL, I'm so used to wandering off on tangents I assume any comment of that variety is aimed my way :P

Yes, and my reply suggested that the underlying assumption of your arugment, that polygamy is bad, is problematic. I questioned your lumping of polygamy and incest into one big ball.


Polygamy = bad is not part of my argument, I am rather specifically trying not to make any argument at all, I raised both because they are relatively common 'atypical relations' that can be consensual, why necrophilia and bestiality are not mentioned. No moral judgement on any of the various relations mentioned are implied, or were meant to be implied. Obviously I do have my own views, which to save further confusion happens to be strong support of gay marriage, lukewarm support of polygamy, and a regrettable mind-bender on incest, I find it revolting but can't think of a reason it should be banned that doesn't apply to other things, hence me fishing other people's heads. ;)

Incest is a whole other ball game.

Because the babies go bad? The prohibition against incest is founded in very sound evolutionary science.


Considering the laws predate sound evolutionary science :P Anyway, two-parter, is their an ethical reason to ban incestuous marriage where there is no reason to believe bad babies will result (one or both partners sterile, old, using birth control, futuristic gene-tinkering) and 2) If 'bad babies' is a legal ground, where does that right for the state come from and is incest the only case it should be applicable? Does the state, by incest laws as precedent, have the right to ban procreation between any cases of significantly heightened genetic defects?
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Let's ban all Christian Marriage. Dannymac - 07/08/2010 06:36:13 AM 1731 Views
Nice satire, but it raises another point for me. Helene - 07/08/2010 07:20:49 AM 1128 Views
One small problem... Phelix - 07/08/2010 08:02:34 AM 1137 Views
Re tax. Rebekah - 07/08/2010 08:47:22 AM 1178 Views
That seems sensible to me. SilverWarder - 09/08/2010 08:13:26 PM 1076 Views
Not sure what you mean by "demoted." Dannymac - 07/08/2010 03:50:02 PM 1206 Views
Nice. *NM* Camilla - 07/08/2010 08:58:20 AM 655 Views
That would only be appropriate if Christians wanted to ban secular unions of normal people. Cannoli - 07/08/2010 11:51:29 AM 1389 Views
Hey, look! There was a point over there! Dannymac - 07/08/2010 03:46:41 PM 1205 Views
Who else should make those decisions? Cannoli - 07/08/2010 08:00:39 PM 1139 Views
I'd totally... Ectheledhel - 08/08/2010 04:14:15 AM 1060 Views
I'd totally... ßelals Girl - 08/08/2010 06:17:30 AM 1220 Views
You'd defend this idiot? *NM* Ectheledhel - 08/08/2010 06:40:34 AM 544 Views
Indeed ßelals Girl - 08/08/2010 06:43:53 AM 1151 Views
I used to think Joel was the biggest rambler on this site. I am seriously reconsidering. everynametaken - 08/08/2010 05:24:56 AM 1163 Views
And my assessment of one poster as the most content-poor, non-contributing slug is unchanged Cannoli - 08/08/2010 07:17:02 PM 1061 Views
Um, ok. *NM* everynametaken - 10/08/2010 12:48:19 AM 542 Views
*Shakes Head* Dannymac - 08/08/2010 06:23:47 AM 1031 Views
I highly doubt Cannoli is "scared" of homosexuals *NM* ßelals Girl - 08/08/2010 06:29:54 AM 581 Views
Perhaps not in the physical sense. Great Lord of Chaos - 08/08/2010 06:35:53 AM 1126 Views
Re: Perhaps not in the physical sense. ßelals Girl - 08/08/2010 06:46:56 AM 1079 Views
Gah! You did that on purpose! Vodalus - 09/08/2010 01:05:13 AM 1031 Views
whoops *NM* ßelals Girl - 09/08/2010 02:22:49 AM 498 Views
Re: *Shakes Head* Cannoli - 08/08/2010 07:43:11 PM 1070 Views
I still do not see how you think marriage is a "pointless" institution LadyLorraine - 08/08/2010 08:05:45 PM 1176 Views
No, I was referring to same-sex marriage. Real marriage hardly counts as a novelty. *NM* Cannoli - 11/08/2010 02:28:43 PM 484 Views
This must be the "thought out reaction" I've heard so much about. Dannymac - 08/08/2010 10:45:59 PM 1010 Views
You cannot be that stupid. Cannoli - 11/08/2010 03:10:55 PM 1301 Views
There's a lot of ridiculous arguments here, but I'll focus on just one of them... Legolas - 11/08/2010 03:38:05 PM 1227 Views
Incorrect. Genders are not treated equally. Dreaded Anomaly - 11/08/2010 07:53:00 PM 1400 Views
all you need is enough support to pass an amendment random thoughts - 08/08/2010 02:46:08 PM 1002 Views
A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too Isaac - 08/08/2010 11:51:24 PM 1044 Views
And what is wrong with polygamy? *NM* Ectheledhel - 09/08/2010 10:36:53 AM 551 Views
Did I say there was anything? Isaac - 09/08/2010 11:03:10 AM 1163 Views
Plolygamy and incest are not on the same level of bad. Camilla - 09/08/2010 11:00:07 AM 1110 Views
Is that assumption valid? Isaac - 09/08/2010 11:36:26 AM 1036 Views
Re: Is that assumption valid? Camilla - 09/08/2010 11:46:42 AM 1026 Views
Re: Is that assumption valid? Isaac - 09/08/2010 12:07:22 PM 1138 Views
Not really snoopcester - 09/08/2010 01:20:46 PM 1001 Views
Re: Not really Isaac - 09/08/2010 01:27:04 PM 1128 Views
Re: Not really snoopcester - 09/08/2010 02:14:43 PM 997 Views
Re: Not really Isaac - 09/08/2010 03:06:31 PM 1173 Views
Spoken like someone who does not have to insure an employee's six wives. Cannoli - 11/08/2010 03:11:57 PM 1162 Views
... Camilla - 11/08/2010 03:22:50 PM 1065 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too snoopcester - 09/08/2010 11:25:39 AM 1067 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too Isaac - 09/08/2010 11:51:50 AM 1029 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too snoopcester - 09/08/2010 01:18:35 PM 1119 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too Isaac - 09/08/2010 02:54:19 PM 1140 Views
Mmm, but when you're strictly discussing marriage LadyLorraine - 09/08/2010 06:13:30 PM 1176 Views
Re: Mmm, but when you're strictly discussing marriage Isaac - 10/08/2010 01:24:06 AM 982 Views
Now I think about it, I'm not sure. Dannymac - 10/08/2010 04:09:43 PM 1101 Views
Re: Now I think about it, I'm not sure. Isaac - 10/08/2010 06:12:39 PM 988 Views
Great post Danny SilverWarder - 09/08/2010 08:22:27 PM 863 Views
It should be noted again... Jeordam - 09/08/2010 08:59:32 PM 1151 Views
and how is it not a right? LadyLorraine - 09/08/2010 09:19:12 PM 1042 Views
My definition of rights... Jeordam - 09/08/2010 10:47:16 PM 1146 Views
mmm, but the UN has legally stated marriage as a right. LadyLorraine - 10/08/2010 02:52:03 AM 910 Views
+1 Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 03:11:22 AM 1208 Views
Article 16 probably not a great example Isaac - 10/08/2010 03:44:04 AM 1003 Views
You could just as easily move the emphasis... Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 04:08:46 AM 1153 Views
If we need a more specific resolution... Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 04:22:12 AM 1338 Views
No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context Isaac - 10/08/2010 05:25:57 AM 1034 Views
Re: No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 03:04:39 PM 1350 Views
That's really a ridiculous stance, you do realize. Legolas - 10/08/2010 03:23:02 PM 960 Views
The point is that marriage IS a right, one which cannot be denied based upon sexual orientation *NM* Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 07:04:16 PM 764 Views
Re: No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context Isaac - 10/08/2010 03:46:56 PM 1202 Views
It doesn't say a man can only marry a woman or vice versa, though. Dreaded Anomaly - 10/08/2010 04:24:17 AM 1021 Views
It also doesn't say they can Isaac - 10/08/2010 04:41:18 AM 1020 Views
You're missing the point. It's not about gay marriage. Legolas - 10/08/2010 11:20:59 AM 1035 Views
No, I got that, I'm pointing out how it does so Isaac - 10/08/2010 01:47:00 PM 1035 Views
I know, and that's been brought up before. But that's not my point. LadyLorraine - 10/08/2010 06:09:32 PM 1002 Views
Re: I know, and that's been brought up before. But that's not my point. Isaac - 10/08/2010 06:33:56 PM 933 Views
It's mentioned as a right in some SC decision quoted in that Walker opinion. *NM* Legolas - 10/08/2010 06:51:13 PM 497 Views
To clarify for you SilverWarder - 10/08/2010 05:36:14 AM 1013 Views
The UNSC is actually the UN's enforcement body... Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 07:16:31 PM 1399 Views
I'm not sure that I would call the Security Council the 'Enforcement Body' SilverWarder - 10/08/2010 08:43:02 PM 1014 Views
The fact that it is capable of authorizing the use of military force makes it an enforcement body Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 10:33:59 PM 1286 Views
Disagree - but it's most a matter of definition there SilverWarder - 11/08/2010 04:31:53 PM 1167 Views
What the UN thinks is *completely* worthless.... Jeordam - 10/08/2010 06:43:15 PM 954 Views
and the Constitution dictates nothing about marriage. *NM* LadyLorraine - 10/08/2010 11:46:24 PM 524 Views
That means it is up to the people. And they say "No." *NM* Cannoli - 11/08/2010 03:13:12 PM 532 Views
No, but it does dictate things about rights and discrimination SilverWarder - 12/08/2010 03:48:02 PM 1203 Views
Why don't YOU back up your assertion that the right to marry exists? *NM* Cannoli - 11/08/2010 03:16:02 PM 534 Views
The actual ruling on Prop 8 specifices marriage as a freedom, not a right. Dreaded Anomaly - 10/08/2010 12:02:17 AM 1131 Views
Out of curiosity, what would you say to using the Ninth Amendment, possibly in conjunction... Vodalus - 10/08/2010 12:20:19 AM 1191 Views
I agree LadyLorraine - 10/08/2010 06:11:19 PM 887 Views
Yeah but this can't be used to prove that it IS a right... Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 07:30:57 PM 1265 Views
Note it all you want... Dannymac - 10/08/2010 06:43:53 AM 884 Views
No, they seek to expand the terms of the partnership. Homosexuals can & do get married normally *NM* Cannoli - 11/08/2010 03:14:25 PM 569 Views
The best one yet. Camilla - 10/08/2010 07:59:17 PM 1141 Views
Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane SilverWarder - 10/08/2010 08:49:24 PM 1000 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane Camilla - 10/08/2010 09:03:11 PM 1119 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane SilverWarder - 11/08/2010 04:35:03 PM 1019 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane Camilla - 11/08/2010 04:41:23 PM 1152 Views
Hmm - been a long time since I read my copy of the graphic novel SilverWarder - 11/08/2010 05:06:47 PM 1125 Views
Re: Hmm - been a long time since I read my copy of the graphic novel Camilla - 11/08/2010 05:09:23 PM 1076 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes