What, because the expressive message of scouting is anti-gay?
Legolas Send a noteboard - 12/08/2010 10:12:54 PM
I've just done some research on that case. BSA was only allowed to dismiss him on the grounds that association with homosexuals "altered" the boy scouts "expressive message."
The expressive message of christianity is a broad and varied thing, but it certainly is not anti-gay. Sin, throughout christianity, is embraced and accepted as part of life we must forgive and deal with.
If Boy Scouts of America is allowed to claim having homosexual message "alters their expressive message", surely churches would be too. BSA tainted the name of scouting worldwide and should be ashamed of itself, but the SC has clearly ruled they had the right to do that.
Gay Marriage
- 12/08/2010 10:23:19 AM
2135 Views
I disagree on the latter part
- 12/08/2010 12:04:15 PM
1466 Views
I follow your point...
- 12/08/2010 12:14:17 PM
1462 Views
Suspect you would find plenty of denominations that would argue with you rather strenuously.
- 12/08/2010 12:24:55 PM
1501 Views
See, that's what I'm saying...
- 12/08/2010 07:37:26 PM
1413 Views
You didn't read my post.
- 12/08/2010 09:10:21 PM
1342 Views
Actually, you didn't read my post
- 12/08/2010 09:23:54 PM
1427 Views
Um, you're wrong.
- 12/08/2010 09:37:13 PM
1364 Views
- 12/08/2010 09:37:13 PM
1364 Views
Re: Um, you're wrong.
- 12/08/2010 09:44:17 PM
1325 Views
- 12/08/2010 09:44:17 PM
1325 Views
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale. And no, he described it accurately. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 09:53:31 PM
688 Views
You're still wrong.
- 12/08/2010 09:54:55 PM
1471 Views
- 12/08/2010 09:54:55 PM
1471 Views
Re: You're still wrong.
- 12/08/2010 09:58:26 PM
1321 Views
- 12/08/2010 09:58:26 PM
1321 Views
Again, you are still wrong.
- 12/08/2010 10:04:42 PM
1395 Views
- 12/08/2010 10:04:42 PM
1395 Views
Re: Again, you are still wrong.
- 12/08/2010 10:17:13 PM
1221 Views
- 12/08/2010 10:17:13 PM
1221 Views
Wrong definition of "club"
- 12/08/2010 10:30:52 PM
1490 Views
Re: Wrong definition of "club"
- 12/08/2010 10:40:55 PM
1410 Views
Also
- 12/08/2010 10:02:44 PM
1443 Views
And wrong again.
- 12/08/2010 10:08:24 PM
1454 Views
- 12/08/2010 10:08:24 PM
1454 Views
Not so quick!
- 12/08/2010 10:21:31 PM
1286 Views
- 12/08/2010 10:21:31 PM
1286 Views
Yes, so quick!
- 12/08/2010 10:32:13 PM
1234 Views
Let's be reasonable here
- 12/08/2010 10:41:53 PM
1343 Views
Why do you get to judge?
- 12/08/2010 10:48:57 PM
1378 Views
I don't
- 12/08/2010 10:53:21 PM
1279 Views
OK.
- 12/08/2010 10:58:22 PM
1373 Views
Re: OK.
- 12/08/2010 11:03:50 PM
1343 Views
Here's the thing: your opinion seems to be informed by the Roman Catholic Faith.
- 12/08/2010 11:14:03 PM
1285 Views
Re: Here's the thing: your opinion seems to be informed by the Roman Catholic Faith.
- 12/08/2010 11:23:35 PM
1396 Views
Then please stop.
- 12/08/2010 11:01:05 PM
1347 Views
- 12/08/2010 11:01:05 PM
1347 Views
What's wrong with discussion?
- 12/08/2010 11:05:48 PM
1303 Views
Discussion? Nothing. Your assertions about other people's views, something.
- 12/08/2010 11:09:48 PM
1308 Views
What, because the expressive message of scouting is anti-gay?
- 12/08/2010 10:12:54 PM
1197 Views
Re: What, because the expressive message of scouting is anti-gay?
- 12/08/2010 10:23:36 PM
1321 Views
Well then that brings us back to my question, which you have yet to answer.
- 12/08/2010 10:36:48 PM
1318 Views
Re: Well then that brings us back to my question, which you have yet to answer.
- 12/08/2010 10:46:22 PM
1418 Views
Not entirely true either... or, well, true as far as Brown goes.
- 12/08/2010 10:08:42 PM
1291 Views
Actually, I did. And since everyone else told you you're wrong about that I didn't see any need
- 12/08/2010 09:38:33 PM
1389 Views
Re: Actually, I did. And since everyone else told you you're wrong about that I didn't see any need
- 12/08/2010 09:55:05 PM
1293 Views
Gah.
- 12/08/2010 09:59:45 PM
1245 Views
What a mature response.
- 12/08/2010 10:11:00 PM
1464 Views
I can't speak for Rebekah, but I don't think the issue is that your points are invalid per se.
- 12/08/2010 10:22:30 PM
1258 Views
Um
- 12/08/2010 09:46:43 PM
1410 Views
That's a very good question. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 09:49:05 PM
662 Views
It makes no sense
- 12/08/2010 04:29:24 PM
1248 Views
Re: It makes no sense
- 12/08/2010 07:39:25 PM
1311 Views
Re: It makes no sense
- 12/08/2010 07:41:02 PM
1412 Views
Yes, but while marrying two murderers does not ensure that they will continue to murder...
- 12/08/2010 09:08:53 PM
1233 Views
Re: Yes, but while marrying two murderers does not ensure that they will continue to murder...
- 12/08/2010 09:42:21 PM
1364 Views
What other church sanctioned circumstances encourage continued sin?
- 12/08/2010 09:45:33 PM
1399 Views
Re: What other church sanctioned circumstances encourage continued sin?
- 13/08/2010 11:04:02 AM
1393 Views
Wow, it's almost like an entire denomination believes that!
*NM*
- 13/08/2010 03:41:07 PM
654 Views
- 13/08/2010 03:43:26 PM
1144 Views
*NM*
- 13/08/2010 03:41:07 PM
654 Views
- 13/08/2010 03:43:26 PM
1144 Views
Yeah, that's the Roman Catholic basis against masturbation and contraception. *NM*
- 13/08/2010 04:12:00 PM
622 Views
Yes
- 13/08/2010 04:22:58 PM
1198 Views
Dude....please at least have a working knowledge of the Bible before you spout off.
- 12/08/2010 10:47:13 PM
1214 Views
secular marriage is decoupled from religious marriage
- 12/08/2010 02:50:43 PM
1433 Views
Simple, require the legal and religious marriage to be performed separately.
- 12/08/2010 02:58:43 PM
1265 Views
And they are, in fact, separate right now in the US. They're just called the same thing.
- 12/08/2010 03:29:26 PM
1308 Views
It's not the same name that's confusing so much as the single ceremony. Or so it seems to me.
- 12/08/2010 03:37:20 PM
1293 Views
I disagree. I think giving the legal institution the same name as the sacrament is the problem.
- 12/08/2010 03:59:43 PM
1289 Views
What in the world would that accomplish?
- 12/08/2010 03:44:32 PM
1345 Views
Provide some much-needed clarity, evidently.
- 12/08/2010 03:49:33 PM
1172 Views
the problem is it would be changing a centuries old tradition..
- 12/08/2010 04:26:47 PM
1217 Views
heheheheheheheHAHAHAHEHEHehehehehahheeh*cough*
- 12/08/2010 04:55:09 PM
1230 Views
thats OK I am sure you will get over it
- 12/08/2010 05:22:08 PM
1244 Views
Just guessing, but I think it was the "centuries old tradition" that set off the giggle fit.
- 12/08/2010 07:25:38 PM
1343 Views
Really? I was hoping for something better
- 12/08/2010 10:06:00 PM
1291 Views
So government recognition makes your religion meaningful?
- 12/08/2010 10:11:54 PM
1404 Views
not my religion I'm agnostic
- 12/08/2010 10:34:40 PM
1236 Views
I'm not far left, thank you very much. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 10:20:31 PM
719 Views
no but your are European and that slants your views
*NM*
- 12/08/2010 10:36:01 PM
699 Views
*NM*
- 12/08/2010 10:36:01 PM
699 Views
Simples
- 12/08/2010 09:30:31 PM
1324 Views
there are about 140 post ranging from boyscouts to infant babtism
- 12/08/2010 10:57:46 PM
1287 Views
So.
- 14/08/2010 01:27:59 AM
1166 Views
sorry I responded I forgot what a tool you are. my bad
- 14/08/2010 02:48:57 AM
1680 Views
You spout some utter gibberish then dish out insults when called on it? Very funny
- 15/08/2010 12:47:04 PM
1519 Views
- 15/08/2010 12:47:04 PM
1519 Views
Agreed *NM*
- 12/08/2010 03:45:04 PM
578 Views
I love you, Camilla
- 12/08/2010 04:02:15 PM
1116 Views
Re: I love you, Camilla
- 12/08/2010 04:04:10 PM
1310 Views
A couple of things
- 12/08/2010 12:58:09 PM
1304 Views
there is major flaw in your argument
- 12/08/2010 03:31:45 PM
1436 Views
Re: there is major flaw in your argument
- 12/08/2010 04:01:32 PM
1317 Views
I should clarify that I support gay marriage
- 12/08/2010 05:20:36 PM
1260 Views
One point about Prop. 8
- 12/08/2010 07:38:55 PM
1277 Views
I know that is the commonl;y held belief but I thinkit is wrong
- 12/08/2010 10:32:58 PM
1207 Views
Religious institutions, though, pushed hard to pass it.
- 12/08/2010 10:42:33 PM
1300 Views
that doesn’t translate into people voting for religious reasons
- 12/08/2010 11:19:48 PM
1108 Views
Bigotry and Fear that are supported and encouraged by religious institutions.
- 12/08/2010 11:32:30 PM
1279 Views
there are major flaws in your argument
- 12/08/2010 07:51:52 PM
1440 Views
Women can't be priests in the Catholic church.
- 12/08/2010 08:00:24 PM
1062 Views
Forcing religious institutions to marry gay couples is hideously unconstitutional.
- 12/08/2010 04:18:59 PM
1380 Views
You are absolutely wrong
- 12/08/2010 07:57:19 PM
1348 Views
Your arguments are so specious and stupid I don't know where to begin.
- 13/08/2010 05:04:17 AM
1243 Views
Why do people equate....
- 12/08/2010 07:11:15 PM
1303 Views
Because "homophobic", like "xenophobic", has shifted a bit in meaning...
- 12/08/2010 07:33:56 PM
1324 Views
Because your reasons for being against gay marriage are so specious *NM*
- 12/08/2010 07:59:42 PM
724 Views
I particularly enjoy the implied assumption that your a good enough judge of my motivations. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 09:24:14 PM
679 Views
Re: Why do people equate....
- 12/08/2010 08:04:24 PM
1499 Views
+1
- 12/08/2010 08:06:19 PM
1442 Views
Stop with the pile on Camilla.
- 12/08/2010 09:22:35 PM
1370 Views
You would have said nothing if I had just said "agreed"
- 12/08/2010 09:27:33 PM
1192 Views
Which speaks highly of you....
- 12/08/2010 09:36:30 PM
1389 Views
This is being very petty. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 09:41:26 PM
685 Views
As opposed to a snarky +1 comment? *NM*
- 12/08/2010 09:45:02 PM
702 Views
It's not snarky.
- 12/08/2010 09:47:47 PM
1353 Views
Its a +1 shorthand comment...
- 12/08/2010 09:52:04 PM
1607 Views
Wow. Those two characters allowed you to read Camilla's motivations?
- 12/08/2010 09:54:25 PM
1229 Views
Re: Why do people equate....
- 12/08/2010 09:13:07 PM
1436 Views
you are exactly why the state needs to make a clear seperation between the secular and religious
- 12/08/2010 09:33:22 PM
1286 Views
Ok, so if the state does then...
- 12/08/2010 09:44:31 PM
1207 Views
No, marriage started because of property.
- 12/08/2010 09:59:14 PM
1322 Views
So then two things come to mind...
- 12/08/2010 10:04:39 PM
1288 Views
Only two?
- 12/08/2010 10:27:08 PM
1293 Views
- 12/08/2010 10:27:08 PM
1293 Views
That's a little difficult to do
- 13/08/2010 03:19:32 PM
1504 Views
Re: That's a little difficult to do
- 13/08/2010 03:30:14 PM
1356 Views
yes but about half of the old testament deals with protecting those rights
- 13/08/2010 05:16:09 PM
1288 Views
The relationship between religion and rain go even farther back...
- 13/08/2010 06:15:32 PM
1284 Views
Actually, I agree with that
- 12/08/2010 10:01:37 PM
1179 Views
See, what I don't get is why gay people care about
- 12/08/2010 08:18:45 PM
1281 Views
It's mostly about getting married in the eyes of the state.
- 12/08/2010 08:42:52 PM
1389 Views
I'm fairly sure Jonte was referring only to the "churches have to accept gay marriages" bit. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 08:44:52 PM
716 Views
Starting again
- 12/08/2010 08:23:08 PM
1403 Views
Not at all
- 12/08/2010 10:58:45 PM
1327 Views
Re: Not at all
- 13/08/2010 09:14:48 AM
1099 Views
Agreed *NM*
- 13/08/2010 10:21:06 AM
579 Views
Oh dear
- 13/08/2010 10:30:45 AM
1200 Views
I suppose you also think that religious Pacifists should be eligible for the draft?
- 12/08/2010 08:42:21 PM
1362 Views

*NM*
*NM*
*NM*