I would classify my church as Bible literalists. The bits that are obviously poetical language we read in that way.
Homosexual marriage, which would involve homosexual sex, is one of a number of things that, we believe, we are told not to do. Forcing us to do even one of these things would undermine our church significantly. It is our ... task to live our lives adhering as much to those rules as possible out of thankfulness for the wondrous things God has done for us. If we were no longer allowed to that, our lives become difficult.
We hurt no one, we do not force anyone to do anything against their will, so why would the State be interested in what we do?
Now. Tell me which sin my church sanctions? Because I'm fascinated to see what you mean by that.
Homosexual marriage, which would involve homosexual sex, is one of a number of things that, we believe, we are told not to do. Forcing us to do even one of these things would undermine our church significantly. It is our ... task to live our lives adhering as much to those rules as possible out of thankfulness for the wondrous things God has done for us. If we were no longer allowed to that, our lives become difficult.
We hurt no one, we do not force anyone to do anything against their will, so why would the State be interested in what we do?
Now. Tell me which sin my church sanctions? Because I'm fascinated to see what you mean by that.
*MySmiley*
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Gay Marriage
12/08/2010 10:23:19 AM
- 1968 Views
I disagree on the latter part
12/08/2010 12:04:15 PM
- 1321 Views
I follow your point...
12/08/2010 12:14:17 PM
- 1305 Views
Suspect you would find plenty of denominations that would argue with you rather strenuously.
12/08/2010 12:24:55 PM
- 1301 Views
See, that's what I'm saying...
12/08/2010 07:37:26 PM
- 1271 Views
You didn't read my post.
12/08/2010 09:10:21 PM
- 1178 Views
Actually, you didn't read my post
12/08/2010 09:23:54 PM
- 1252 Views
Um, you're wrong.
12/08/2010 09:37:13 PM
- 1214 Views

Re: Um, you're wrong.
12/08/2010 09:44:17 PM
- 1191 Views

Boy Scouts of America v. Dale. And no, he described it accurately. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:53:31 PM
- 612 Views
You're still wrong.
12/08/2010 09:54:55 PM
- 1321 Views

Re: You're still wrong.
12/08/2010 09:58:26 PM
- 1171 Views

Again, you are still wrong.
12/08/2010 10:04:42 PM
- 1223 Views

Re: Again, you are still wrong.
12/08/2010 10:17:13 PM
- 1068 Views

Wrong definition of "club"
12/08/2010 10:30:52 PM
- 1328 Views
Re: Wrong definition of "club"
12/08/2010 10:40:55 PM
- 1235 Views
Also
12/08/2010 10:02:44 PM
- 1278 Views
And wrong again.
12/08/2010 10:08:24 PM
- 1303 Views

Not so quick!
12/08/2010 10:21:31 PM
- 1134 Views

Yes, so quick!
12/08/2010 10:32:13 PM
- 1084 Views
Let's be reasonable here
12/08/2010 10:41:53 PM
- 1196 Views
Why do you get to judge?
12/08/2010 10:48:57 PM
- 1228 Views
I don't
12/08/2010 10:53:21 PM
- 1104 Views
OK.
12/08/2010 10:58:22 PM
- 1229 Views
Re: OK.
12/08/2010 11:03:50 PM
- 1164 Views
Here's the thing: your opinion seems to be informed by the Roman Catholic Faith.
12/08/2010 11:14:03 PM
- 1115 Views
Re: Here's the thing: your opinion seems to be informed by the Roman Catholic Faith.
12/08/2010 11:23:35 PM
- 1230 Views
Then please stop.
12/08/2010 11:01:05 PM
- 1189 Views

What's wrong with discussion?
12/08/2010 11:05:48 PM
- 1139 Views
Discussion? Nothing. Your assertions about other people's views, something.
12/08/2010 11:09:48 PM
- 1157 Views
What, because the expressive message of scouting is anti-gay?
12/08/2010 10:12:54 PM
- 1041 Views
Re: What, because the expressive message of scouting is anti-gay?
12/08/2010 10:23:36 PM
- 1174 Views
Well then that brings us back to my question, which you have yet to answer.
12/08/2010 10:36:48 PM
- 1147 Views
Re: Well then that brings us back to my question, which you have yet to answer.
12/08/2010 10:46:22 PM
- 1249 Views
Not entirely true either... or, well, true as far as Brown goes.
12/08/2010 10:08:42 PM
- 1146 Views
Actually, I did. And since everyone else told you you're wrong about that I didn't see any need
12/08/2010 09:38:33 PM
- 1220 Views
Re: Actually, I did. And since everyone else told you you're wrong about that I didn't see any need
12/08/2010 09:55:05 PM
- 1147 Views
Gah.
12/08/2010 09:59:45 PM
- 1091 Views
What a mature response.
12/08/2010 10:11:00 PM
- 1298 Views
I can't speak for Rebekah, but I don't think the issue is that your points are invalid per se.
12/08/2010 10:22:30 PM
- 1090 Views
Um
12/08/2010 09:46:43 PM
- 1243 Views
That's a very good question. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:49:05 PM
- 578 Views
It makes no sense
12/08/2010 04:29:24 PM
- 1092 Views
Re: It makes no sense
12/08/2010 07:39:25 PM
- 1167 Views
Re: It makes no sense
12/08/2010 07:41:02 PM
- 1261 Views
Yes, but while marrying two murderers does not ensure that they will continue to murder...
12/08/2010 09:08:53 PM
- 1076 Views
Re: Yes, but while marrying two murderers does not ensure that they will continue to murder...
12/08/2010 09:42:21 PM
- 1195 Views
What other church sanctioned circumstances encourage continued sin?
12/08/2010 09:45:33 PM
- 1251 Views
Re: What other church sanctioned circumstances encourage continued sin?
13/08/2010 11:04:02 AM
- 1193 Views
Wow, it's almost like an entire denomination believes that!
*NM*
13/08/2010 03:41:07 PM
- 582 Views
13/08/2010 03:43:26 PM
- 986 Views


Yeah, that's the Roman Catholic basis against masturbation and contraception. *NM*
13/08/2010 04:12:00 PM
- 548 Views
Yes
13/08/2010 04:22:58 PM
- 1032 Views
Dude....please at least have a working knowledge of the Bible before you spout off.
12/08/2010 10:47:13 PM
- 1067 Views
secular marriage is decoupled from religious marriage
12/08/2010 02:50:43 PM
- 1269 Views
Simple, require the legal and religious marriage to be performed separately.
12/08/2010 02:58:43 PM
- 1098 Views
And they are, in fact, separate right now in the US. They're just called the same thing.
12/08/2010 03:29:26 PM
- 1145 Views
It's not the same name that's confusing so much as the single ceremony. Or so it seems to me.
12/08/2010 03:37:20 PM
- 1155 Views
I disagree. I think giving the legal institution the same name as the sacrament is the problem.
12/08/2010 03:59:43 PM
- 1135 Views
What in the world would that accomplish?
12/08/2010 03:44:32 PM
- 1196 Views
Provide some much-needed clarity, evidently.
12/08/2010 03:49:33 PM
- 1028 Views
the problem is it would be changing a centuries old tradition..
12/08/2010 04:26:47 PM
- 1047 Views
heheheheheheheHAHAHAHEHEHehehehehahheeh*cough*
12/08/2010 04:55:09 PM
- 1066 Views
thats OK I am sure you will get over it
12/08/2010 05:22:08 PM
- 1083 Views
Just guessing, but I think it was the "centuries old tradition" that set off the giggle fit.
12/08/2010 07:25:38 PM
- 1212 Views
Really? I was hoping for something better
12/08/2010 10:06:00 PM
- 1144 Views
So government recognition makes your religion meaningful?
12/08/2010 10:11:54 PM
- 1228 Views
not my religion I'm agnostic
12/08/2010 10:34:40 PM
- 1094 Views
I'm not far left, thank you very much. *NM*
12/08/2010 10:20:31 PM
- 634 Views
no but your are European and that slants your views
*NM*
12/08/2010 10:36:01 PM
- 625 Views

Simples
12/08/2010 09:30:31 PM
- 1170 Views
there are about 140 post ranging from boyscouts to infant babtism
12/08/2010 10:57:46 PM
- 1131 Views
So.
14/08/2010 01:27:59 AM
- 1020 Views
sorry I responded I forgot what a tool you are. my bad
14/08/2010 02:48:57 AM
- 1528 Views
You spout some utter gibberish then dish out insults when called on it? Very funny
15/08/2010 12:47:04 PM
- 1351 Views

Agreed *NM*
12/08/2010 03:45:04 PM
- 506 Views
I love you, Camilla
12/08/2010 04:02:15 PM
- 964 Views
Re: I love you, Camilla
12/08/2010 04:04:10 PM
- 1161 Views
A couple of things
12/08/2010 12:58:09 PM
- 1148 Views
there is major flaw in your argument
12/08/2010 03:31:45 PM
- 1275 Views
Re: there is major flaw in your argument
12/08/2010 04:01:32 PM
- 1162 Views
I should clarify that I support gay marriage
12/08/2010 05:20:36 PM
- 1095 Views
One point about Prop. 8
12/08/2010 07:38:55 PM
- 1132 Views
I know that is the commonl;y held belief but I thinkit is wrong
12/08/2010 10:32:58 PM
- 1057 Views
Religious institutions, though, pushed hard to pass it.
12/08/2010 10:42:33 PM
- 1145 Views
that doesn’t translate into people voting for religious reasons
12/08/2010 11:19:48 PM
- 967 Views
Bigotry and Fear that are supported and encouraged by religious institutions.
12/08/2010 11:32:30 PM
- 1131 Views
there are major flaws in your argument
12/08/2010 07:51:52 PM
- 1269 Views
Women can't be priests in the Catholic church.
12/08/2010 08:00:24 PM
- 923 Views
Forcing religious institutions to marry gay couples is hideously unconstitutional.
12/08/2010 04:18:59 PM
- 1231 Views
You are absolutely wrong
12/08/2010 07:57:19 PM
- 1176 Views
Your arguments are so specious and stupid I don't know where to begin.
13/08/2010 05:04:17 AM
- 1106 Views
Why do people equate....
12/08/2010 07:11:15 PM
- 1126 Views
Because "homophobic", like "xenophobic", has shifted a bit in meaning...
12/08/2010 07:33:56 PM
- 1174 Views
Because your reasons for being against gay marriage are so specious *NM*
12/08/2010 07:59:42 PM
- 643 Views
I particularly enjoy the implied assumption that your a good enough judge of my motivations. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:24:14 PM
- 607 Views
Re: Why do people equate....
12/08/2010 08:04:24 PM
- 1323 Views
+1
12/08/2010 08:06:19 PM
- 1283 Views
Stop with the pile on Camilla.
12/08/2010 09:22:35 PM
- 1205 Views
You would have said nothing if I had just said "agreed"
12/08/2010 09:27:33 PM
- 1034 Views
Which speaks highly of you....
12/08/2010 09:36:30 PM
- 1212 Views
This is being very petty. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:41:26 PM
- 592 Views
As opposed to a snarky +1 comment? *NM*
12/08/2010 09:45:02 PM
- 607 Views
It's not snarky.
12/08/2010 09:47:47 PM
- 1168 Views
Its a +1 shorthand comment...
12/08/2010 09:52:04 PM
- 1436 Views
Wow. Those two characters allowed you to read Camilla's motivations?
12/08/2010 09:54:25 PM
- 1084 Views
Re: Why do people equate....
12/08/2010 09:13:07 PM
- 1258 Views
you are exactly why the state needs to make a clear seperation between the secular and religious
12/08/2010 09:33:22 PM
- 1125 Views
Ok, so if the state does then...
12/08/2010 09:44:31 PM
- 1055 Views
No, marriage started because of property.
12/08/2010 09:59:14 PM
- 1156 Views
So then two things come to mind...
12/08/2010 10:04:39 PM
- 1136 Views
Only two?
12/08/2010 10:27:08 PM
- 1128 Views

That's a little difficult to do
13/08/2010 03:19:32 PM
- 1318 Views
Re: That's a little difficult to do
13/08/2010 03:30:14 PM
- 1169 Views
yes but about half of the old testament deals with protecting those rights
13/08/2010 05:16:09 PM
- 1127 Views
The relationship between religion and rain go even farther back...
13/08/2010 06:15:32 PM
- 1121 Views
Actually, I agree with that
12/08/2010 10:01:37 PM
- 1023 Views
See, what I don't get is why gay people care about
12/08/2010 08:18:45 PM
- 1121 Views
It's mostly about getting married in the eyes of the state.
12/08/2010 08:42:52 PM
- 1237 Views
I'm fairly sure Jonte was referring only to the "churches have to accept gay marriages" bit. *NM*
12/08/2010 08:44:52 PM
- 642 Views
Starting again
12/08/2010 08:23:08 PM
- 1228 Views
Not at all
12/08/2010 10:58:45 PM
- 1154 Views
Re: Not at all
13/08/2010 09:14:48 AM
- 937 Views
Agreed *NM*
13/08/2010 10:21:06 AM
- 483 Views
Oh dear
13/08/2010 10:30:45 AM
- 1049 Views
I suppose you also think that religious Pacifists should be eligible for the draft?
12/08/2010 08:42:21 PM
- 1200 Views